Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT) AFWA/XOGM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operational Use of the Dvorak Technique at the NHC
Advertisements

1 GOES-R Hurricane Intensity Estimation (HIE) Validation Tool Development Winds Application Team Tim Olander (CIMSS) Jaime Daniels (STAR)
RAMMT/CIRA Tropical Cyclone Overview THE DVORAK TECHNIQUE Introduction Visible Technique IR Technique Strengths and Weaknesses Lab Exercise: Visible Pattern.
A Blended, Multi-Platform Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensification Index
Future Plans  Refine Machine Learning:  Investigate optimal pressure level to use as input  Investigate use of neural network  Add additional input.
Acknowledgments: ONR NOPP program HFIP program ONR Marine Meteorology Program Elizabeth A. Ritchie Miguel F. Piñeros J. Scott Tyo Scott Galvin Gen Valliere-Kelley.
CORP Symposium Fort Collins, CO August 16, 2006 Session 3: NPOESS AND GOES-R Applications Tropical Cyclone Applications Ray Zehr, NESDIS / RAMM.
Analysis of High Resolution Infrared Images of Hurricanes from Polar Satellites as a Proxy for GOES-R INTRODUCTION GOES-R will include the Advanced Baseline.
Application of the Computer Vision Hough Transform for Automated Tropical Cyclone Center-Fixing from Satellite Data Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert.
Advanced Objective Dvorak Technique (AODT) AFWA/XOGM
Update on the UW-CIMSS Advanced Dvorak Technique (ADT) Tim Olander, Chris Velden and Tony Wimmers University of Wisconsin – Madison Cooperative Institute.
The Impact of Satellite Data on Real Time Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
TC Intensity Estimation: SATellite CONsensus (SATCON) Derrick Herndon, Chris Velden, Tony Wimmers, Tim Olander International Workshop on Tropical Cyclone.
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
CIMSS TC Intensity Satellite Consensus (SATCON) Derrick Herndon and Chris Velden Meteorological Satellite (METSAT) Conference Ford Island Conference Center.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZED CLOUD CLUSTERS ON WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC AND THEIR WARM CORE STRUCTURE KOTARO BESSHO* 1 Tetsuo Nakazawa 1 Shuji Nishimura.
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
Possible impacts of improved GOES-R temporal resolution on tropical cyclone intensity estimates INTRODUCTION The Advanced Baseline imager (ABI) on GOES-R.
SOME EXPERIENCES ON SATELLITE RAINFALL ESTIMATION OVER SOUTH AMERICA. Daniel Vila 1, Inés Velasco 2 1 Sistema de Alerta Hidrológico - Instituto Nacional.
Computing Deep-Tropospheric Vertical Wind Shear Analyses for TC Applications: Does the Methodology Matter? Christopher Velden and John Sears Univ. Wisconsin.
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.
The ARCHER automated TC center-fixing algorithm: Updates on real-time operations, accuracy and capabilities Anthony Wimmers and Christopher Velden Cooperative.
PREDICTABILITY OF WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC TROPICAL CYCLONE EVENTS ON INTRASEASONAL TIMESCALES WITH THE ECMWF MONTHLY FORECAST MODEL Russell L. Elsberry and.
05/06/2016 Juma Al-Maskari, 1 Tropical Cyclones.
Downscaling tropical cyclones from global re-analysis and scenarios: Statistics of multi-decadal variability of TC activity in E Asia Hans von Storch,
NHC/JHT Products in ATCF Buck Sampson (NRL, Monterey) and Ann Schrader (SAIC, Monterey) IHC 2007 Other Contributors: Chris Sisko, James Franklin, James.
A. FY12-13 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page Title: Improvements to the Advanced Dvorak Technique Status: New – but continuing work from GIMPAP FY07-09.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
POTENTIAL THESIS TOPICS Professor Russell L. Elsberry January 26, 2006 Graduate School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Department of Meteorology, Naval.
The Impact of Lightning Density Input on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasts Mark DeMaria, John Knaff and Debra Molenar, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort.
CIMSS/NESDIS-USAF/NRL Experimental AMSU TC Intensity Estimation: Storm position corresponds to AMSU-A FOV 8 [1 30] Raw Ch8 (~150 hPa) Tb Anomaly: 5.36.
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
High impact weather studies with advanced IR sounder data Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS),
Can Dvorak Intensity Estimates be Calibrated? John A. Knaff NOAA/NESDIS Fort Collins, CO.
John Kaplan (NOAA/HRD), J. Cione (NOAA/HRD), M. DeMaria (NOAA/NESDIS), J. Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS), J. Dunion (U. of Miami/HRD), J. Solbrig (NRL), J. Hawkins(NRL),
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
AODT The Advanced Objective Dvorak Technique JHT Progress Report - Latest Advancements Timothy Olander, Christopher Velden, James Kossin, Anthony Wimmers,
GOES-R Hurricane Intensity Estimation (HIE) Winds-HIE Application Team Chris Velden & Tim Olander (CIMSS) Jaime Daniels (STAR)
The Potential Role of the GPM in Activities at the Naval Research Laboratory Joe Turk and Jeff Hawkins Naval Research Laboratory Marine Meteorology Division.
Second IBTrACS Workshop, April 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii 1 ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Best Track Consolidation Meeting, Dec 2010 Hong Kong Summary.
Developing a Dust Retrieval Algorithm Jeff Massey aka “El Jeffe”
Overview of CIRA and NESDIS Global TC Services Presented by John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch Fort Collins, CO USA For The.
2012 NHC Proving Ground Products Hurricane Intensity Estimate (HIE) Chris Velden and Tim Olander 1.
New Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Tools for the Western North Pacific Mark DeMaria and John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU.
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Satellite Analysis Branch 2009 Year in Review Anthony Salemi with Michael Turk NOAA Hurricane Conference December 1, 2009.
TOWARD AN OBJECTIVE SATELLITE-BASED ALGORITHM TO PROVIDE REAL-TIME ESTIMATES OF TC INTENSITY USING INTEGRATED MULTISPECTRAL (IR AND MW) OBSERVATIONS Jeff.
Diagnosing the Intensity of Super Typhoon Haiyan
Andrea Schumacher1, M. DeMaria2, and R. DeMaria1
Training Session: Satellite Applications on Tropical Cyclones
Satellite Derived Mid- Upper Level Winds
Using Lightning Data to Monitor the Intensification of Tropical Cyclones in the Eastern North Pacific By: Lesley Leary1, Liz Ritchie1, Nick Demetriades2,
AUTOMATED TROPICAL CYCLONE EYE DETECTION USING DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS
A Probabilistic Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Algorithm
BFB: 9/29/2015 Tropical Weather
Verifying Precipitation Events Using Composite Statistics
More on tropical cyclones
Tropical Weather By Rick Garuckas and Andrew Calvi
GOES-R Risk Reduction Research on Satellite-Derived Overshooting Tops
GOES visible (or “sun-lit”) image
Preparation for use of the GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI)
Training Session: Satellite Applications on Tropical Cyclones
Defining Uncertainty in Hurricane Maximum Surface Wind Estimation
Downscaling tropical cyclones from global re-analysis and scenarios: Statistics of multi-decadal variability of TC activity in E Asia Hans von Storch,
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
TC Intensity Estimation: SATellite CONsensus (SATCON)
Assimilation of GOES-R Atmospheric Motion Vectors
Advanced Dvorak Technique
Cloud Patterns in Subtropical Cyclones / Hybrid Systems
Presentation transcript:

Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT) AFWA/XOGM NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

UW-CIMSS Objective Dvorak Technique Material for this training module largely comes from: UW-CIMSS Objective Dvorak Technique Tim Olander and Chris Velden University of Wisconsin - Madison Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies In cooperation with : Jeff Hawkins Naval Research Laboratory - Monterey, CA Office of Naval Research

Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT) Overview - What is the ODT? - How does it work? - Why use it? - How will we use it here? NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT) What is the ODT? ODT is a computerized method for determining the intensity of tropical cyclones. It was originally developed by the University of Wisconsin, and we are able to perform some ODT functions currently. Ok, so how does it work? NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Methodology

ODT Methodology Identification of two environmental temperatures (BTs) Uses IR data only Eye Temperature (0-40 km) Cloud Temperature (26-136 km) Scene identification performed ODT is only performed for four types of features: Eye, Embedded Center, CDO, and Shear SIDAS version only handles EYE currently Based on histogram and Fourier Transform Analysis

ODT Methodology Determination of the cloud pattern is performed objectively (in other words, by the computer) by examining area histograms of cloud top temperatures and corresponding Fourier Analysis for the eye region and surrounding cloud region. Based on this analysis, four scene patterns can be categorized by ODT: Eye, Central Dense Overcast, Embedded Center, and Shear.

ODT Methodology Storm Center Location EYE determination The only user input is the specification of the storm center location ODT only does intensities EYE determination If the storm has an eye, it uses the warmest pixel temperature within a 40 km radius of the chosen storm center Warm values represent ocean surface or low cloud within the eye This value is retained as the 'eye temperature'.

ODT Methodology

Warmest value = 'eye temperature'

ODT Methodology EYE determination (con’t) ODT analyzes temperatures on concentric rings (1 pixel wide) centered on the eye between 24 km and 136 km from the eye location (this range was empirically determined by many observations of coldest ring radii). For GOES data with 4km pixel resolution, this results in a total of 28 rings that are analyzed to determine the 'surrounding temperature'. In addition, a continuous ring of cold temperatures surrounding the eye is more indicative of an organized (and more intense) storm than one with breaks in the convection. Therefore, the warmest temperature found on each ring is identified and stored, with the coldest of these retained as the final surrounding temp value. ODT does not reposition the storm center, since it has been found that the subsequent analysis of the surrounding temperature field may be improperly influenced by this adjustment in some cases ('false' eyes).

ODT Methodology

ODT Methodology

ODT Methodology The warmest temperature is found on each ring...

ODT Methodology This ring has “Light Grey” as its warmest temp.

ODT Methodology Of those temps that are left, the coldest is taken as the surrounding ring

ODT Methodology “No Eye” Condition ODT can handle Central Dense Overcast (CDO)/Embedded Center Temperatures near the storm center are dominated by cold cloud tops and a warm eye is not resolvable. The value of the pixel at the user-defined storm center location is used as the 'eye’ temperature Shear scenario is also detected in ODT The SHEAR, CDO/EMBD CTR ARE NOT YET AVAILABLE IN SIDAS VERSION OF SOFTWARE

ODT Methodology Initial intensity estimate determined (Raw T#) Based on original Dvorak Rules for different patterns and cloud top temperatures. Eye temperature serves as adjustment Use history file with previous storm analysis data (Final T#) Provide data for 12-hour time weighted time averaging scheme This means we have to perform ODT every hour Data is saved in SIDAS interface Implementation of Dvorak Rule 9 for weakening storms (CI#) Corrects underestimate bias in weakening storms Hold T# constant for 12 hours after initial weakening, add 1.0 T# until dissipation or restrengthening Not currently implemented in SIDAS

ODT Purpose 3. It’s WANTED Ok, but why use it? 1. It’s OBJECTIVE Doesn’t depend on opinions of human being Done the same way every time Can be more accurate (sometimes) 2. It’s FAST Computer derived Some storms are harder than others 3. It’s WANTED JTWC has formally requested that we do this We are holding off until full capability is here Test mode only for now

Current User Status Operational Use Experimental Use NOAA/NESDIS Satellite Analysis Branch NHC/Tropical Analysis Forecast Branch Experimental Use Joint Typhoon Warning Center Air Force Weather Agency Central Pacific Hurricane Center Australian Bureau of Meteorology Japanese Meteorological Agency

Developmental Data Sample Independent Data Sample ODT Past Performance Units in hPa Bias RMSE Sample ODT +1.69 7.34 407 Op. Center +4.31 10.35 407 TAFB +2.29 10.76 305 ODT +1.58 7.46 305 SAB +4.88 10.42 319 ODT +1.45 7.35 319 AFWA +5.55 12.06 146 ODT +0.53 7.39 146 Developmental Data Sample 1995-1997 Units in hPa Bias RMSE Sample ODT -0.72 7.97 397 Op. Center -0.05 10.38 397 TAFB -1.25 10.65 341 ODT -0.62 8.72 341 SAB +0.58 9.91 334 ODT -0.53 8.75 334 AFWA +1.83 10.40 334 ODT -0.43 8.07 334 Independent Data Sample 1998-1999 Legend : TAFB - Tropical Analysis Forecast Branch - NOAA/NCEP SAB - Satellite Analysis Branch - NOAA/NESDIS AFWA - U.S. Air Force Weather Agency

Super Typhoon Bilis (18W) http://pzal.npmoc.navy.mil/jtwc_archive/2000/STORM_FOLDERS/NORTHWEST_PACIFIC/18W/Time_Intensity_Chart/18W_ti.gif Good agreement with operational center and Best Track estimates Slight overestimate during intensification and at peak CI#s compare better with Best Track during weakening than Final T#s Rapid weakening indicated by Final T#s supported by AMSU data (landfall) SAB ODT estimates differ from JTWC ODT during intensification

Super Typhoon Saomai (22W) http://pzal.npmoc.navy.mil/jtwc_archive/2000/STORM_FOLDERS/NORTHWEST_PACIFIC/22W/Time_Intensity_Chart/22W_ti.gif Good agreement with operational center and Best Track estimates Underestimate during weakening with Final T#s (should use CI#s) Initial estimates off due to very cold cloud top temperatures (~-80ºC) SAB ODT analysis very similar to JTWC ODT analysis

Super Typhoon Shanshan (26W) http://pzal.npmoc.navy.mil/jtwc_archive/2000/STORM_FOLDERS/NORTHWEST_PACIFIC/26W/Time_Intensity_Chart/26W_ti.gif Slight disagreement with operational center and Best Track estimates Over/Underestimate during strengthening/weakening processes CI#s compare better with Best Track during weakening than Final T#s Rapid intensification cycles noted but led to ODT overestimates SAB ODT analysis very similar to JTWC ODT analysis

Summary and Conclusions 6 storm sample for 2000 West Pacific season Overall, good comparison between JTWC and SAB ODT estimates JTWC and SAB ODT Final T# estimates were typically within 0.5 T# of JTWC Best Track estimates Very cold cloud temperatures led to high bias in Final T# relative to JTWC Best Track estimates (cloud temperatures < upper -70°C) Rapid intensification flag correctly identified events but led to large Final T# high bias when coupled with very cold cloud top temperatures (tuning to West Pacific needed) Slight differences between JTWC and SAB ODT estimates Possible errors with ocean basin identification (basin flag is manually adjusted; could be automated) Implementation of 48 Hour Rule is slightly different between JTWC and SAB due to different ODT versions (fixed vs. time-weighted value) Overall, CI#s provided better fit to JTWC Best Track estimate than Final T#s during weakening

Future Directions Operational ODT Usage Full operational test at JTWC during 2001 with devoted analyst (patterned after SAB and TAFB evaluation) Experimental use only here at AFWA Research Focus Further tune ODT for West Pacific based on JTWC and SAB 2000 results Expand analysis range for tropical storms and weaker systems (will remove need for 48 Hour Rule) Investigate application of rapid intensification flag based on user analysis and feedback Begin development of Multispectral Dvorak Technique (MDT), incorporating multiple satellite and channel information (AMSU, SSM/I, visible, water vapor, etc.)

ODT Implementation JTWC uses it on NSDS-E SAB uses it in MCIDAS How will we use it here? SIDAS New Eye Intensity Calculation ODT IS ALWAYS TO BE PERFORMED AFTER YOU COMPLETE YOUR OWN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS! NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation Previous SIDAS Method ODT Method NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Methodology ODT uses rings….

Previous SIDAS Method The SIDAS method uses radial measurements of temperature. ODT and SIDAS are different! Neither include any banding features!

ODT Implementation The SIDAS method is only for a “point in time”. The ODT is time averaged. ~ So…..we need to save this ODT calculation…….. NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z. Hit the button

ODT Implementation Once you hit the button, the names of all available ODT storm archives will appear NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z. Hit the button:

ODT Implementation Highlight the ODT storm archive file that you need NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation Highlight the ODT storm archive file that you need Then Hit the button: NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.

ODT Implementation Remember that you will need to do this every hour NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z. Remember that you will need to do this every hour (while the storm has an EYE!)

Questions? Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT) AFWA/XOGM NCEP will be testing their model backup procedures on 2/14/01 between 1730Z and 2000Z.