UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Pay & Performance?
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Leadership Development Nova Scotia Public Service
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Meet the HR Management Team New Faculty & Staff Event BRAVO! Employee Recognition First Faculty & Staff Night.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey Eileen Filliben Edmunds, JD/MBA November 4, 2014.
Metropolitan State College of Denver Metropolitan State College of Denver 2010 Campus Climate Survey Presented by: Richard Boyer Partner, ModernThink LLC.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
A Tale of Two Surveys Metropolitan State College of Denver Faculty Senate Marilyn Cullen-Reavill, Diane Davis, Christopher Jennings & Aaron S. Richmond.
Presented by: Richard Boyer Partner, ModernThink LLC 2015 Campus Climate Survey September 21, 2015.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey All Campus Update January 21, 2015.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey Richard K. Boyer.
Great Colleges to Work For Survey: 2013 Results
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
Teambuilding For Supervisors. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives You will be able to: Recognize the value of team efforts Identify.
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Board Feedback Results Board Meeting Dallas April 2007 Board Feedback Results Governance Committee Report Presented at Los Angeles July 2007.
2014 Great Colleges Survey Overview, Results & Recommendations.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
Employee Pulse Survey March 2010 Office of Human Resources.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Student Life.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Information Technology.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Finance and Administration.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Enrollment Management.
Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Athletics.
Leader of the Pack: The Role of the DON in Green House Homes
2017 Great Colleges to Work for Survey: Main Takeaways
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
Alexandria City Public Schools Preliminary Results of the 2016 Teaching, Empowering, Leading, and Learning (TELL) Survey. Dawn Shephard Associate Director, Teaching,
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
The High Cost of Low Morale
Saint Joseph’s college of maine
Woodland Public Schools Staff Survey Results
Survey of Organizational Excellence
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Communications.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Great Colleges To Work For Survey
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2018 UNC System Engagement Survey
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 UNC System employee engagement survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey Results
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Our Staff Charter These are the behaviours that matter most to us as a team. They define how we agree to work together to achieve our shared objective.
Employee Engagement Survey 2015 Town of Chapel Hill
Presentation transcript:

UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in! Richard Boyer October 8, 2018

Strongly Disagree, Disagree Response Guidelines Response Options: Strongly Agree, Agree, Sometimes Agree/Sometimes Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree, Not Applicable Positive Responses Strongly Agree, Agree Negative Responses Strongly Disagree, Disagree Guideline Score Description 75% + Very Good to Excellent < 10% 65 – 74% Good 10 – 14% 55 – 64% Fair to Mediocre 15 – 19% 45 – 54% Warrants Attention 20 – 29% < 45% Poor 30% +

Survey Overview Methodology Response Rate Benchmarks Online Survey Administered: March 26 – April 13, 2018 Response Rate 2018 Overall Response Rate: 3,256/6,925 – 47% Benchmarks 2018 Honor Roll – Large (>10,000) 2018 Carnegie Classification – Research 2018 Alabama University SUG Peer Benchmark

Response Rates Job Category Total Responded Percentage All Employees 6,925 3,256 47% Executive/ Admin/ Managerial 120 74 62% Clerical/ Secretarial 1,085 584 54% Professional 2,176 1,159 53% Service/ Maintenance 1,036 494 48% Faculty 1,884 733 39% Technical/ Paraprofessional 398 137 34% Skilled Crafts 221 33% Other 5 1 20%

15 Core Survey Dimensions Job Satisfaction/Support Policies, Resources & Efficiency Faculty, Administration & Staff Relations Teaching Environment Shared Governance Communication Professional Development Pride Collaboration Compensation, Benefits & Work/Life Balance Supervisors/Department Chairs Fairness Facilities Senior Leadership Respect & Appreciation

Dimensions (% Positive)

Dimensions (% Positive)

Dimensions (% Positive)

Barometer Statements Survey Statement 25 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 25 Overall, my department is a good place to work. 78 7 6 60 All things considered, this is a great place to work. 77 4 74 59 This institution’s culture is special – something you don’t find just anywhere. 61 13 57 16

Top Ten Statements Survey Statement 5 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 5 I understand how my job contributes to this institution's mission. 89 3 36 I am proud to be part of this institution. 85 2 81 4 49 This institution actively contributes to the community. 83 29 The institution takes reasonable steps to provide a safe and secure environment for the campus. 24 I have a good relationship with my supervisor/department chair. 6

*Benchmark Data not available for custom statements. Top Ten Statements Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 25 Overall, my department is a good place to work. 78 7 6 *63 My supervisor respects and values my personal/family life. - 60 All things considered, this is a great place to work. 77 4 74 2 I am given the responsibility and freedom to do my job. 83 5 34 This institution's benefits meet my needs. 67 11 *Benchmark Data not available for custom statements.

Strengths Job Fit, Autonomy & Connection to Mission Benefits & Work/Life Balance Facilities Supervisor/Department Chair Competencies Diversity, Equity & Inclusion © 2018. All rights reserved.

Job Fit, Autonomy & Connection to Mission Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 1 My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. 75 7 78 6 2 I am given the responsibility and freedom to do my job. 77 83 5 I understand how my job contributes to this institution's mission. 89 3 49 This institution actively contributes to the community. 81 4 36 I am proud to be part of this institution. 85

Benefits & Work/Life Balance Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 34 This institution's benefits meet my needs. 77 6 67 11 53 This institution's policies and practices give me the flexibility to manage my work and personal life. 69 10 71 9 47 My supervisor/department chair supports my efforts to balance my work and personal life. 79 8

Benefits & Work/Life Balance Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) *61 I am able to maintain a healthy balance between my personal life and professional life. 67 10 - *62 My efforts to balance my work and personal life are accepted and respected by colleagues in my department. 73 8 *63 My supervisor respects and values my personal/family life. 78 7 *64 The culture at this institution is one that supports and values our employees' ability to balance work and personal life. 65 11 *Benchmark Data not available for custom statements.

Facilities Survey Statement 31 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 31 The facilities (e.g., classrooms, offices, laboratories) adequately meet my needs. 71 10 64 13 29 The institution takes reasonable steps to provide a safe and secure environment for the campus. 81 5

Supervisor/Department Chair Competencies Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 3 My supervisor/department chair makes his/her expectations clear. 71 10 73 9 7 I receive feedback from my supervisor/department chair that helps me. 66 13 67 12 I believe what I am told by my supervisor/department chair. 68 15 My supervisor/department chair regularly models this institution's values. 75 19 My supervisor/department chair is consistent and fair. 70 11

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 50 This institution places sufficient emphasis on having diverse faculty, administration and staff. 72 10 45 At this institution, people are supportive of their colleagues regardless of their heritage or background. 70 8 74 7 54 This institution has clear and effective procedures for dealing with discrimination. 9

Bottom Ten Statements Survey Statement 11 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 11 I am paid fairly for my work. 47 33 45 30 28 My department has adequate faculty/staff to achieve our goals. 46 42 32 16 Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability. 27 52 22 Changes that affect me are discussed prior to being implemented. 26 18 Issues of low performance are addressed in my department. 48 25

Bottom Ten Statements Survey Statement 35 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 35 Our recognition and awards programs are meaningful to me. 46 24 43 26 9 I am regularly recognized for my contributions. 48 55 19 14 I can speak up or challenge a traditional way of doing something without fear of harming my career. 54 22 61 17 42 Faculty, administration and staff are meaningfully involved in institutional planning. 44 21 45 58 There's a sense that we're all on the same team at this institution. 20

Opportunities Resource Constraints Performance Management/Accountability Communication & Collaboration Shared Governance Senior Leadership © 2018. All rights reserved.

Resource Constraints Survey Statement 11 I am paid fairly for my work. 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 11 I am paid fairly for my work. 47 33 45 30 28 My department has adequate faculty/staff to achieve our goals. 46 42 32 4 I am provided the resources I need to be effective in my job. 67 10 63

Performance Management/Accountability Survey Statement 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 30 Our orientation program prepares new faculty, administration and staff to be effective. 65 11 54 17 Our review process accurately measures my job performance. 55 20 19 18 Issues of low performance are addressed in my department. 48 25 22 16 Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability. 47 27 52 9 I am regularly recognized for my contributions. 24

Communication Survey Statement 8 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 8 When I offer a new idea, I believe it will be fully considered. 56 17 63 13 21 In my department, we communicate openly about issues that impact each other's work. 18 60 14 22 Changes that affect me are discussed prior to being implemented. 42 26 47 43 At this institution, we discuss and debate issues respectfully to get better results. 46 52

Collaboration Survey Statement 13 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 13 We have opportunities to contribute to important decisions in my department. 54 19 60 15 23 People in my department work well together. 64 10 67 8 26 I can count on people to cooperate across departments. 58 11 There's a sense that we're all on the same team at this institution. 46 20 48

Shared Governance Survey Statement 38 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 38 The role of faculty in shared governance is clearly stated and publicized. 56 16 39 Faculty are appropriately involved in decisions related to the education program (e.g., curriculum development, evaluation). 64 11 67 10 42 Faculty, administration and staff are meaningfully involved in institutional planning. 44 21 45 19 46 Faculty, administration and staff work together to ensure the success of institution programs and initiatives. 65 8 66 7 55 There is regular and open communication among faculty, administration and staff. 49 18 50

Senior Leadership Survey Statement 32 48 2018 Alabama (% Positive) 2018 Alabama (% Negative) 2018 SUG Peers (% Positive) 2018 SUG Peers (% Negative) 32 Our senior leadership has the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for institutional success. 68 9 69 48 Senior leadership regularly models this institution's values. 66 10 27 Senior leadership provides a clear direction for this institution's future. 58 17 55 41 Senior leadership communicates openly about important matters. 54 52 16 37 Senior leadership shows a genuine interest in the well-being of faculty, administration and staff. 57 56 I believe what I am told by senior leadership. 14

Richard K. Boyer rboyer@modernthink.com 302.764.4477 Additional Resources Richard K. Boyer rboyer@modernthink.com 302.764.4477 © 2018. All rights reserved.