Long-term results after surgical treatment of paravalvular leak in the aortic and mitral position  Ismail Bouhout, MD, MSc, Amine Mazine, MD, MSc, Aly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical complications: Summary assessment of.
Advertisements

Max B. Mitchell, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
A cherry blossom moment in the history of heart valve replacement
Effect of intravenous N-acetylcysteine on outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 
Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters  Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,
Influence of the On-X mechanical prosthesis on intermediate-term major thromboembolism and hemorrhage: A prospective multicenter study  Vincent Chan,
Aly Ghoneim, MD, Ismail Bouhout, MD, Louis P
A heart team’s perspective on interventional mitral valve repair: Percutaneous clip implantation as an important adjunct to a surgical mitral valve program.
In which patients is transcatheter aortic valve replacement potentially better indicated than surgery for redo aortic valve disease? Long-term results.
Effect of intravenous N-acetylcysteine on outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 
Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St
Conduction Disorders After Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement
Amine Mazine, MD, MSc, Subodh Verma, MD, PhD, Bobby Yanagawa, MD, PhD 
Neurologic complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with and without aortic manipulation: Meta-analysis of 11,398 cases from 8 studies 
Aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair as treatment of complications after percutaneous core valve implantation  Chiara Comoglio, MD, Massimo.
Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: A comparative study among different biological options  Aly Ghoneim, MD, Ismail Bouhout,
Form ever follows function
Hassane Abdallah, MD, Alaae Boutayeb, MD, Gebrine El Khoury, PhD 
Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement  Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,
The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: Results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study  Joseph E. Bavaria, MD, Nimesh D.
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Does the degree of preoperative mitral regurgitation predict survival or the need for mitral valve repair or replacement in patients with anomalous origin.
Twenty-Year Experience With the CarboMedics Mechanical Valve Prosthesis  Denis Bouchard, MD, Amine Mazine, MD, Louis-Mathieu Stevens, MD, Michel Pellerin,
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD 
Surgical treatment of a rare association: Aberrant right coronary origination, coronary arteriovenous fistula, and aortic root aneurysm  Frédéric Vanden.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies  J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,
Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses
Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD 
Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005  Scott D. Barnett, PhD,
Kevin Bridge, MD, MSPH, Robert Saeid Farivar, MD, PhD 
Conventional redo biological valve replacement over 20 years: Surgical benchmarks should guide patient selection for transcatheter valve-in-valve therapy 
Tirone E. David, MD, Gheorghe Gavra, MD, Christopher M
A cherry blossom moment in the history of heart valve replacement
Derrick Y. Tam, MD, Stephen E. Fremes, MD, MSc 
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Sinus of Valsalva aneurysms: Stabilizing the repair destabilizing the aortic valve?  M. Sertaç Çiçek, MD, FACC  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Left sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: Rare disease, rarer presentation
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Thirty-year experience with a bileaflet mechanical valve prosthesis
Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery  Bryan M. Burt, MD, Andrew W. ElBardissi, MD,
Surgical treatment of paravalvular leak: Long-term results in a single-center experience (up to 14 years)  Maurizio Taramasso, MD, Francesco Maisano,
Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations
Commentary: Three-dimensional P3 tethering angle at the heart of future surgical decision making in ischemic mitral regurgitation  Wobbe Bouma, MD, PhD,
Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?
Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD 
Arnt E Fiane, MD, Odd R Geiran, MD, PhD, Jan L Svennevig, MD, PhD 
Innovation in cardiothoracic surgical training
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Severe tricuspid or mitral regurgitation in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. Can we leave them alone?  Juan A. Crestanello, MD  The Journal of.
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable  Craig M. Jarrett,
Commentary: When a choice is not an echo
Between a rock and a hard place
Maral Ouzounian, MD, PhD, Amine Mazine, MD, MSc, Tirone E. David, MD 
The Robin Hood principle in the treatment of congenital heart disease: Taking technologic developments intended for adults and using it in kids  Paul.
Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out  Glen B. Taksler, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Apples remain apples NO matter what
Francesco Nappi, MD, Cristiano Spadaccio, MD, PhD 
National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements  Abby J. Isaacs, MS, Jeffrey Shuhaiber,
Chordal replacement with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures for mitral valve repair: A 25- year experience  Tirone E. David, MD, Susan Armstrong, MSc, Joan.
Which biologic valve should we select for the 45- to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement?  F. Dagenais, MD, P. Cartier, MD, P. Voisine,
Surgical techniques for posterior aortic root enlargement
Is early antithrombotic therapy necessary in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves in normal sinus rhythm?  Andrew W. ElBardissi, MD, MPH, Daniel.
Presentation transcript:

Long-term results after surgical treatment of paravalvular leak in the aortic and mitral position  Ismail Bouhout, MD, MSc, Amine Mazine, MD, MSc, Aly Ghoneim, MD, Xavi Millàn, MD, Ismail El-Hamamsy, MD, PhD, Michel Pellerin, MD, Raymond Cartier, MD, Phillipe Demers, MD, MSc, Yoan Lamarche, MD, MSc, Denis Bouchard, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 151, Issue 5, Pages 1260-1266.e1 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046 Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A, Aortic and (B) mitral paravalvular leak prevalence in each clock position according to the native valve anatomy. LCS, Left coronary sinus; RCS, right coronary sinus; NCS, noncoronary sinus; AML, anterior mitral leaflet; PML, posterior mitral leaflet. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A, Cumulative survival after surgical treatement of paravalvular leak. B, Cumulative survival in the mitral valve replacement and aortic valve replacement groups. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. MVR, Mitral valve replacement; AVR, aortic valve replacement. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Freedom from NYHA functional class III or IV. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. NYHA, New York Heart Association. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E1 Cumulative incidence of paravalvular leak recurrence. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. PVL, Paravalvular leak. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E2 Cumulative incidence of paralvalvular leak recurrence in the mitral and aortic valve replacement groups. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. PVL, Paravalvular leak. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E3 Freedom from first rehospitalization for heart failure. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Survival after surgical correction of mitral and/or aortic paravalvular leak. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 151, 1260-1266.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.046) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions