Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 180, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in Resected Lung Cancer  Ting Wang, MD, Lili Luo, MD, He Huang, MD, Jingrui.
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
European Urology Oncology
Prostate Cancer Detection: A View of the Future
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Metastases  Axel Heidenreich, Nicola Fossati, David Pfister, Nazareno Suardi,
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (July 2010)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Is It Necessary to Detect All Prostate Cancers in Men with Serum PSA Levels
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in Resected Lung Cancer  Ting Wang, MD, Lili Luo, MD, He Huang, MD, Jingrui.
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
The Diverse Genomic Landscape of Clinically Low-risk Prostate Cancer
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Heterogeneity in Definitions of High-risk Prostate Cancer and Varying Impact on Mortality Rates after Radical Prostatectomy  Matthew Mossanen, Kenneth.
European Urology Oncology
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Michael S. Leapman, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Edith Canby-Hagino, Javier Hernandez, Timothy C. Brand, Ian Thompson 
Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, Nicholas T
End-to-side Somatic-to-autonomic Nerve Grafting to Restore Erectile Function and Improve Quality of Life After Radical Prostatectomy  Jeanette C. Reece,
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
European Urology Oncology
TMEscore is a prognostic biomarker and predicts immunotherapeutic benefit. TMEscore is a prognostic biomarker and predicts immunotherapeutic benefit. A,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 123-131 (July 2015) A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score Predicts Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy and Adverse Surgical Pathology in a Racially Diverse Population of Men with Clinically Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer  Jennifer Cullen, Inger L. Rosner, Timothy C. Brand, Nan Zhang, Athanasios C. Tsiatis, Joel Moncur, Amina Ali, Yongmei Chen, Dejan Knezevic, Tara Maddala, H. Jeffrey Lawrence, Phillip G. Febbo, Shiv Srivastava, Isabell A. Sesterhenn, David G. McLeod  European Urology  Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 123-131 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.030 Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 REMARK diagram detailing study cohort. * Walter Reed National Military Medical Center: 2001–2011; Madigan Army Medical Center: 1990–2011. AP=adverse pathology; BCR=biochemical recurrence; CPDR=Center for Prostate Disease Research; GS=Gleason score, RP=radical prostatectomy; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network; REMARK=Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies [10]. European Urology 2015 68, 123-131DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.030) Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Distribution of Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) results by (A) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group, (B) age quartiles, and (C) race. The bottom and top lines of the box are the first and third quartiles of the GPS results; the line within the box is the median GPS. The ends of the whiskers represent the extension of 1.5× interquartile range from the first and third quartiles. GPS=Genomic Prostate Score; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network; Q=quartile. European Urology 2015 68, 123-131DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.030) Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 (A) Univariable hazard ratios (HRs) for Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) within different clinical subgroups. The size of the each box is proportional to the number of patients within that patient subgroup. The thin horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each HR. The solid vertical line indicates the HR for GPS for the entire cohort. The dashed vertical line indicates a HR of 1 (no association). Due to the low number of BCR events in the subgroups of patients aged <56 yr or Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) patients, the CIs for the HR of GPS were wider and included 1. (B) Univariable odds ratios (ORs) for GPS in predicting adverse pathology at RP within different clinical subgroups. The size of the each box is proportional to the number of patients within that patient subgroup. The thin horizontal lines indicate the 95% CI for each OR. The solid vertical line indicates the OR of GPS for the entire cohort. The dashed vertical line indicates an OR of 1 (no association). CI=confidence interval; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network; MAMC=Madigan Army Medical Center; PSA=prostate-specific antigen; Q=quartile; WRNMMC=Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. European Urology 2015 68, 123-131DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.030) Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Performance of gene groups and individual genes that make up the Genomic Prostate Score. (A) Univariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval for gene groups and individual genes for predicting biochemical recurrence. (B) Univariable odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI for gene groups and individual genes for predicting adverse pathology. Each square represents the standardized HR or OR for each individual gene or gene group. The thin horizontal lines indicate the 95% CI for each HR or OR. Standardized HR or OR indicates the HR or OR per 1-standard deviation increase in gene expression measured on the log scale. Standardized HR >1 or OR >1 indicates that higher expression is associated with worse outcome. CI=confidence interval. European Urology 2015 68, 123-131DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.030) Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions