Proposal Phase Draft & Review Phase Approval Phase

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASTM Work Item Collaboration Area February Purpose of Collaboration Space Web forum that enables a task group to accelerate the development of a.
Advertisements

Metro Muncipal Agreement Program
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Briefing Outline  Overview of the CUI Program  Establishment of the Program  Elements of the CUI Executive Order  Requirements and Timelines  Categories.
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [ Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation.
ENTSO-E Metadata Repository Introduction
Technical Workshop Bridge Standard Detail Sheets (XS) October 31, 2011 DES-SP&I-DTS.
SAA Nina Smithback June 17,  SAA and VA Contact Info and Resources  Approved School Categories and Assigned SAA Consultant  New SAA Catalog.
DINA HUMBLE, NORCO/DISTRICT CURRICULUM COMMITTEE CHAIR CHIP HERZIG, TECHNICAL REVIEW/CURRICUNET The Program Approval Process Riverside Community College.
OGC LEGAL AFFAIRS EDUCATION PROGRAM CONTRACTING AND PURCHASING AT DEPAUL, FROM START TO FINISH A JOINT PRESENTATION BY ANASTASIA KATINAS, OFFICE OF THE.
EADM 732 Maria E. Haigh Lupe Valdivia Marissa Fulache.
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation.
3/25/08 1 University Policies Web Site ( Faculty-Staff Handbook 1460) Sharyl KammerzellAnn Thompson Senior Associate.
Building for tomorrow’s leaders Los Angeles Community College District Program Management Office Master Planning and FMP&OC Policy and Procedures Sample.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
 Personal experience (work / life)  Competency (demonstrated)  Training (non-credit bearing)
Policies, Policies, Policies! What are they? Why are they important? How do I develop new ones or revise old ones? Office of Legal Affairs Fall Symposium.
Implementing the NIHSS In Your Organization January 2008.
OPTN Bylaws Substantive Rewrite of the Bylaws Addressing Review, Actions, and Due Process Sponsored by the Membership and Professional Standards Committee.
MBIE Fire Programme 2015/16 Michael Belsham – Fire Engineer.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2014 Update MRAM - May 8, 2014 Ted Mordhorst Asst. Dir. For Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting and Analysis University.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2014 Update MRAM - March 13, 2014 Ted Mordhorst Asst. Dir. For Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting and Analysis University.
Routing a Request for Funding Proposals always route through Dept, CALS, and the University.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
EAC Voting System Certification Process (Test Plan) - 3/21/05
1 Office of the Vice President for Planning and Policy Overview of Policy Administration.
Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b.
Contract Compliance Training. Department Personnel Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Mario K. Castillo General Counsel John Guest Deputy General Counsel.
U.T. System Administration Delegation of Authority to Sign Contracts Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel.
Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.
Routing new or revised Rules
Contract Compliance Training
ERCOT Bylaws Changes for Regional Entity
Florida Codes and Standards
Cynthia Holcomb Education Specialist
process and procedures for assessments
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Rachel Coyne Manager, Reliability Standards Program
Global Grid Forum GridForge
Procurement Timelines Overview
of the Standing Committee Bonn, 9-10 November 2016
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Contract Compliance Training
Introduction to Sponsored Programs
2017 Amendments to the INCITS Organization, Policies and Procedures
Contracting by Negotiation Process Map – Part 15 (1 of 3)
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Standards Development: An Overview
WFA.62 – Outside Professional Activities
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification
AGREEMENTS OFFICE Support Agreement (SA) Process
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review
Colorado state university-pueblo policy and administration (PA)
Department of Environmental Quality
Review & maintenance of IAEG Glossary
University Policies Web Site (Faculty-Staff Handbook 1460)
UCR Space Request Process Flowchart
Status report of TF-CS/OTA
Do We Have a Policy About That. Do We Need One
Overview of standards-related obligations and reporting by Mongolia
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
A JOINT PRESENTATION BY
Standards Development Process
Administrative Policy Development Process Doc # , Approved by Division Directors on , Updated , , Administrative Policy Committee.
Accessing Higher Ground
Budget and Legislative Request
Progress Report GUID on Information Systems Audit
MHBE IAC Meeting 2015 Renewal Process
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

The Texas A&M University System Regulation Development and Maintenance Guidance Proposal Phase Draft & Review Phase Approval Phase Step 1 – Need identified. A) New B) Revision or Deletion C) Required 5-year review Step 2 – Submit online Regulation Questionnaire (see Step 1- A or B) OR 5-Year Certification Review (see Step 1-C). Step 3 – Policy Office reviews the Questionnaire or Certification request. Step 4 – Submitter, Subject Matter Expert (SME), Policy Office, and/or OGC discuss further, if necessary. Step 5 – Policy Office reviews the submitted document and discusses any comments/ queries with the SME. Step 6 – Policy Office submits to OGC for legal sufficiency review. Step 7 – Policy Office returns to SME, if necessary, with OGC comments/queries. Step 8 – Subsequent to OGC review, Policy Office submits to System Member Policy Compliance Officers for review. Step 9 – SME revises the regulation, if necessary, with feedback from members, and submits it to the Policy Office as a final. Step 10 – Policy Office sets targeted timelines for final approval completions to be tracked. Step 11 – OGC reviews & approves the final regulation. Step 12 – Policy Office routes final regulation for required signatures of the General Counsel and Chancellor. Step 13 – Approvals are provided to the Policy Office. Step 14 – The Policy Office communicates the new/revised regulation systemwide and posts to the web.