HMA Follow On Activities Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service (Sensor Planning Service) Monthly Progress Meeting 2 March 2010 Reuben Wright, Deimos Space

Schedule Deliverables Actions Work in Progress SPS 2.0 SPS Extension for EO SFRE Requirements SFRE Development

Schedule 1/2

Schedule 2/2

Proposal Information: List of Documentation Deliverables

Proposal Information: List of Software Deliverables

New actions from PR 02/02/10 open The current deliverables URD and SRD do not match the structure of the SSS, SRS and SDD documents. To be aligned. Spotimage to propose an alignment with EO GML data model for pieces where there is overlap. A possibility would be URNs referring to the EO GML specification. [At AWG it was noted that these could be stored in a sub-space of the OGC registry. Note that this uses URLs (not URNs) and RDF descriptions.] EO specific use cases and scenarios (including notification) should be included in one of the Task 2 deliverables. Old use cases and interaction diagrams from HMA-I Scenario TN can be redrawn. Spotimage/Deimos should review the old HMA-I Scenario TN, extract the old scenarios and use cases, validate them with the new evolution (e.g. reserve, confirm) since and update these scenarios and use cases. Should be included in one of the Task 2 deliverables. DLR recommends to include also the scenario from GSCDA operational scenarios about tasking. SPS Tasking Parameters: ESA requests Spotimage to check this list of parameters and see if it maps on descending, ascending etc. There is not yet a consensus on the list of parameters. DLR expresses doubt that Stereoscopic radar would fit these programming parameters. Spot Image will check. If not applicable to radar, this should be explained in the specification. closed Spotimage to reply to the post on the Forum from MDA about SPS. Spotimage to list which are the possible bottlenecks for approval of the EO SPS specification, e.g. dependency on SPS 2.0 approval + SWECommon approval etc. Send email about this including date the specification was sent to OAB. Other HMA-FO tasks to register to the “Ordering SWG”. on www.opengeospatial.org/projects/groups/swg Action to organise a joint teleconf (programming/ordering) with MDA to better understand the tasking scenario where delivery options should be passed at tasking time without a separate ordering service. ESA requests the other tasks to use the Task 4 SRS and SDD deliverables as reference and also apply the ECSS-E-ST-40C in a similar way for their RB and TS deliverables. The currently existing deliverables are to be reorganized accordingly. [see also action 34]

Status: released as an RFC Work in Progress: SPS 2.0 Status: released as an RFC There were several caveats: The OAB will provide comments in parallel during public comment period. OAB members to use twiki to capture comments. As per the OGC Policies and Procedures, there must be a technical presentation to the OGC Membership. This can happen at the closing Plenary in Frascati. There is also OAB guidance as to how requirements might be better documented. This guidance will be provided during the public comment period. To better match the OGC Specification Model Requirements pulled out of text and labelled with URIs Specification organised by requirements classes (including ATS)

Work in Progress: SPS Extension for EO Status Drafted throughout To be done Requirements pulled out of text and made explicit ATS reorganised to match requirements classes

Work in Progress: SFRE Requirements Requirements Baseline Documents Version 1.0 documents asked to be reworked Most recent ECSS 40C used New documents are Software System Specification (SSS) and Software Requirements Specification (SRS) RIDs All minor (other than document reorganisation) and implemented Process Last review at Deimos and Astrium needed, then will be reissued

Work in Progress: SFRE Development Development meeting EADS Astrium, Toulouse 25/02/10 Decisions taken regarding process, scope, configuration Development process Multiple release strategy will be adopted. Allows for much more confidence in integration Release 0 of SF Server (previous SPS 0.9.5 software updated to SPS 2.0 schemas) is ready to test Software Design Document (SDD) Decision taken to produce an integrated document for both SF Client and SF Server ECSS 40C will be followed