WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
71 th IETF – Philadelphia, USA March 2008 PCECP Requirements and Protocol Extensions in Support of Global Concurrent Optimization Young Lee (Huawei) J-L.
Advertisements

71st IETF Philadelphia, March 2008 ERO Extensions for Path Key draft-bradford-ccamp-path-key-ero-01.txt Richard Bradford : JP Vasseur.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-01 Chandrasekar Ramachandran Markus.
WG Document Status 91st IETF CCAMP Working Group1.
MPLS-TP - 78th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang Nabil.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-06 Author list: Fei Zhang, ZTE
WG Document Status 88th IETF CCAMP Working Group.
WG Document Status 192nd IETF TEAS Working Group.
MIBs for GMPLS IETF #56, San Francisco draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-00.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-00.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-00.txt.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
Draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-07 draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initated-lsp-03 Stateful PCE - update Ina Minei Ed Crabbe Jan Medved Robert Varga Siva Sivabalan.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
RSVP-TE Extensions to Realize Dynamic Binding of Associated Bidirectional LSP CCAMP/MPLS WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01.
CCAMP - 69th IETF GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional LSPs draft-berger-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-00.txt Lou Berger Attila Takacs Diego Caviglia Don.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases-03
Path Computation Element Working Group
CCAMP Working Group Status
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
Use Cases for Using PCE to act as a Central Controller (PCECC) Component draft-zhao-teas-pce-central-controller-use-cases-00.txt 95th Buenos Aires.
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-06 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-05 Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi.
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-03 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-03 Tarek Saad (Presenter)
PCEP Extension for Native IP ietf
IETF BMWG FRR Related Benchmarking Drafts Status and Update
An analysis of scaling issues in MPLS-TE backbone networks
IETF BMWG FRR Related Benchmarking Drafts Status and Update
Guard Bands requirements for GMPLS controlled optical networks
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
TEAS Working Group IETF 99 - Prague Online Agenda and Slide:
TEAS Working Group IETF London Online Agenda and Slides:
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-06 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-05 Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi.
Path Computation Element WG Status
draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00
Greg Mirsky IETF-99 July 2017, Prague
Yang model for requesting
Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Egress Local Protection
WG Document Status Compiled By: Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
TEAS Working Group IETF 97 Seoul Online Agenda and Slide:
draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-00
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-08 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-07 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-01
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
Path Computation Element WG Status
YANG Data Models for TE <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-16> Latest YANG
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
3 Week A: May 1 – 19 3 Week B: May 22 – June 9
Path Computation Element WG Status
IETF 100 – Singapore November 2017
TEAS Working Group IETF 102
draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05
TEAS Working Group: IETF Montreal
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF TEAS Working Group.
Handling YANG Revisions – Discussion Kickoff
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF TEAS Working Group.
TEAS Working Group IETF Prague
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-19 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-10 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-05 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls-01.
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
MPLS Working Group IETF 102 – London July 2018 MPLS Session:
Path Computation Element WG Status
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF TEAS Working Group.
Royi Zigler(Broadcom)
IETF-103, November 2018, Bangkok
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
Yang Data Model for Layer 3 TE Topologies
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
Presentation transcript:

WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr From: Rakesh Gandhi (Jul 13th ’17). Adopted as a WG document (May 18th ‘17). Revision -01 (May 24th ‘17): Update covers various FRR scenarios including node-protection, revertive behavior and unidirectional link failures. Open Issues: Cover 1-to-1 protection (detour). Next Steps: Looking for further review/suggestions. IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-pcecc-use-cases From: Boris Khazanov, July 17th . 01 version of the draft was published. It includes changes that we made according to comments in the list after WG adoption poll (i.e. about grouping of use cases, references to other drafts etc. from Adrian and others). Working on one additional use case; plan is to include in the next version in few weeks. It will be also in TE LSP section so no significant changes. IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection From: No Update Received. Current Status: WG LC Complete (May 7th ‘17). Waiting for Shepherd write-up. Open Issues: Shepherd Review uncovered some issues. Major Issue: SERO backwards compatibility (PROTECTION needs a new CTYPE). Next Steps: Shepherd to work with the authors and get the document ready for publication. IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection From: No Update Received. Current Status: WG LC Complete (May 7th ‘17). Waiting for Shepherd write-up. Open Issues: Shepherd Review uncovered some issues (editorial cleanup). Next Steps: Shepherd to work with the authors and get the document ready for publication. IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources From: Adrian Farrel [July 17th ‘17] Revision -03 (Published June 26th ‘17): Mainly a keep-alive (couple of format tweaks). Document is complete Plans and next steps: Wait for the solutions work to progress. “PCEP Extensions for LSP scheduling with stateful PCE” is now a WG document. IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group

draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording From: No Update Received Current Status (Expired): No revisions since Sept ‘16. Julien Meuric has kindly volunteered to help with the progress. Open Issues: Comments received from Pavan ( June 6th, 2016) on the list are yet to be addressed. Next Steps: Address outstanding comments. IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group