Open Data for Global Science Developing a Surfers Paradise for Research Data Legal Framework for e-Research Conference Gold Coast, Australia 11 May 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Session I: Technology, Trade and Growth-lessons of Experiences Session I: Technology, Trade and Growth-lessons of Experiences Issues related to technology.
LAPSI 4th Thematic Seminar Muenster, January 27, 2011 Should the information held by research institutions be included in the EU Directive on PSI Re-use?
WIPO Conference on Building Partnerships for Mobilizing Resources for Development Thematic Session 2 Science, Technology and Innovation for Development.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
DSpace: the MIT Libraries Institutional Repository MacKenzie Smith, MIT EDUCAUSE 2003, November 5 th Copyright MacKenzie Smith, This work is the.
Electronic commerce EDI (8 decade) – base of EC – “Netscape” – propose SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) 1995 – “Amazon.com” “eBay.com” 1998 – DSL (Digital.
Policy for Publicly Funded Scientific Data in the U.S. Symposium on the Value of Shared Access and Reuse of Publicly Funded Scientific Data 1 December.
Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
Open Access Advocacy on the National - and International - Level Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC June 23, 2011 OAI7 Geneva, Switzerland.
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
OPEN ACCESS PUBLICATION ISSUES FOR NSF OPP Advisory Committee May 30, /24/111 |
Information Gulags, Intellectual Straightjackets & Memory Holes First African Digital Curation Conference February 2008 by Paul F. Uhlir Director,
Thematic Breakout Session: Panel 7.2. Environmental & Geospatial Data & Metadata Report by: Raed M. Sharif.
Emerging Institutional Paradigms for Providing Open and Permanent Access to Scientific Data and Information CODATA Workshop on Strategies for Open and.
BRDI U.S. – China Roundtable on Scientific Data Cooperation: An Overview of Objectives and Activities October 2008 Paul F. Uhlir, Director Subhash Kuvelker,
Framing the Public Interest Agenda in Copyright Global Congress on IP and the Public Interest, Washington DC August 25, 2011 Prof. P. Bernt Hugenholtz.
P OA Week: Open Access & Copyright Seminar 23 October 2014 Dr. Tobias Schonwetter Director: UCT IP Unit.
JRC's Open Access (OA) Policy G. P. Tartaglia, A. Annoni, G. Merlo, F
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
1 Sharing Research Data in Hong Kong (position paper) Professor John Bacon-Shone Associate Director, Knowledge Exchange The University of Hong Kong Forum.
Moving from Restrictive Dissemination of Publicly- Funded Knowledge to Open Knowledge Environments: A Case Study in Microbiology Symposium on Designing.
Access to Data and Information from Publicly Funded Research A Policy Perspective International Workshop on Strategies for Permanent Access to Scientific.
International Experiences in Data Policy Seminario Internacional Santiago, Chile 9 July 2010 by Paul F. Uhlir Director, Board on Research Data and Information.
1 Axel Plathe UNESCO ETD 2003 Next Steps - Electronic Theses and Dissertations Worldwide Berlin, Germany, 21 May 2003 Scientific information for equitable.
Session Two: The Status of Access to Scientific Data Roberta Balstad Columbia University 18 April 2011.
Review of recent studies on PSI re-use and related markets in the EU Estimating the market value of PSI Graham Vickery Information Economics Open Government.
Current Issues in International Intellectual Property Law Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources in the Pacific Pacific Science Association Conference.
Providing Access to Your Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version 1.0 Review Date.
Jeffery Loo December 17, 2009 On Promoting Open Access at LBNL.
Designing the Microbial Research Commons: An International Symposium Overview National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC October 8-9, 2009 Cathy H. Wu.
Deepak Maheshwari Director – Corporate Affairs Microsoft India.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
DIY Research Data Management Training Kit for Librarians Data sharing Anne Donnelly Liaison Librarian College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine College.
Environmental Data Issues in the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Paul F. Uhlir Director, International S&T Information Programs The National.
1 Why should “WE” CARE about data?. International initiatives OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding 2007 “Access.
Recommendation of the OECD Council for enhanced access and more effective use of public sector information 11 th Meeting of the PSI Group European Commission.
Research Recommendations for the Broadband Taskforce Agenda November 23, 2009.
Social and Professional Issues in IT Roshan Chitrakar.
Digital Divide: Challenge of Leadership? Presentation by Dr. Gillian M Marcelle, Principal Consultant, Technology for Development and Bureau Member UN.
Providing Access to Your Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Copyright 2012 Matthew Mayernik. Version 1.0 October 2012 Section:
Networked Information Resources SPARC, E-prints & Open Access initiatives.
South Africa in the global knowledge arena: implications for academic libraries Andrew M. KANIKI Executive Director: Knowledge Management and Strategy.
LAPSI Conference: Comment Universita Bocconi, Milan 5 May 2011 Paul F. Uhlir, J.D. Director, Board on Research Data and Information National Academy of.
1 Access to Research Data from Public Funding: The development of international principles and guidelines for OECD countries CODATA conference, 23 October.
Session 6: Summary of Discussion A. Institutional Barriers and Potential Solutions 1. Natural environment does not have national or institutional boundaries,
Heather Joseph, Executive Director The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition Washington, DC USA THE SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
Vision for academic geographic data access Dr David Medyckyj-Scott GRADE Project Director EDINA.
Digital repositories and scientific communication challenge Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
CODATA Global Information Commons for Science Initiative 20 th CODATA Conference Beijing, China 25 October 2006 by Paul F. Uhlir Director, Office of International.
When and Why Should Research Data be Sustained? National Science Foundation Workshop Cyberinfrastructure for Large Facilities December 1-2, 2015 Christine.
Emerging Institutional Models for Providing Open Access to Scientific Information International Workshop on Open Access to Scientific Literature and other.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Charlotte McClain-Nhlapo, Senior Operations Officer, Workshop on Innovation in Accessible Transport for All. 14 January 2010 Washington, DC.
1 Abdul Waheed Khan Communication and Information Sector UNESCO Building Knowledge Societies.
Creating Global Information Commons for Science Presentation at the EUROCRIS meeting September 2006, Brussels by Jean-Jacques Royer CODATA Treasurer.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
RDA-CODATA INTEREST GROUP ON LEGAL INTEROPERABILITY OF RESEARCH DATA (Original) Working Group Charter: The proposed Research Data Alliance – CODATA Working.
Big Data, Little Data, No Data – Who is in Charge of Data Quality? World Data Systems Webinar #9 9 May 2016 Christine L. Borgman Distinguished Professor.
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
OceanDocs Digital Repository of Marine Science Research Outputs
Recent Developments in Open Data Policy
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
An Introduction to Open Data
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Presentation transcript:

Open Data for Global Science Developing a Surfers Paradise for Research Data Legal Framework for e-Research Conference Gold Coast, Australia 11 May 2007 by Paul F. Uhlir Director, Office of International Scientific and Technical Information Programs The National Academies Washington, DC USA

Open Data for Global Science Comparison of some key characteristics of the print and digitally networked paradigms PRINT GLOBAL DIGITAL NETWORKS (pre) Industrial Age post-industrial Information Age fixed, static transformative, interactive rigid flexible, extensible physical virtual local global linear non-linear, asynchronous, with time/space collapsed limited content and types unlimited contents and multimedia distribution difficult, slow easy and immediate dissemination copying cumbersome, not perfect copying simple and identical significant marginal distribution cost zero marginal distribution cost single user (or small group) multiple, concurrent users/producers centralized production distributed production slow knowledge diffusion accelerated knowledge diffusion

Open Data for Global Science Key stakeholders in the development of scientific data access policies: Governments Research funding agencies Universities and not-for-profit research institutes Learned societies International scientific organizations Industry research institutions Individual researchers The general public

Open Data for Global Science Broad implications of excessive restrictions (economic, legal, technological) on access to and reuse of data and information from public sources: 1) Higher research costs 2) Lost opportunity costs 3) Barriers to innovation 4) Less effective scientific cooperation and education 5) Sub-optimal quality of data 6) Widening gap between OECD and developing countries Opennness thus should be the default rule, subject only to legitimate and well-justified exceptions.

Open Data for Global Science What is an information commons? Digital data and information originating principally from government or publicly-funded sources; Made freely available for broad, common use online; With the material in the public domain, or with only some rights reserved (using a common-use licenses, such as Creative Commons), or, less optimally, with full intellectual property rights, but under open access conditions; and Typically organized thematically through an institutional mechanism.

Open Data for Global Science Advantages of openness science: Promotes interdisciplinary, inter-institutional, and international research; Enables automated knowledge discovery; Avoids duplication of research and promotes new research and new types of research; Reinforces open scientific inquiry and encourages diversity of analysis and opinion, Allows for the verification of previous results, Makes possible the testing of new or alternative hypotheses and methods of analysis; Supports studies on data collection methods and measurement; Facilitates the education of new researchers; Enables the exploration of topics not envisioned by the initial investigators; Permits the creation of new data sets when data from multiple sources are combined; Facilitates transfer of information North -> South and South South; Promotes capacity building in developing countries; and Generally helps to maximize the research potential of new digital technologies and information, providing greater returns from public investments in research. Many other advantages and justifications outside research…

Open Data for Global Science Compelling reasons for placing government-generated data and information in the public domain or under common-use conditions: Legal. A government entity needs no legal incentives from exclusive property rights to create information. Both the activities that the government undertakes and the information produced by it in the course of those activities are a [global] public good. Socioeconomic. Many economic and non-economic positive externalities. Network effects can be realized on an exponential basis through the open dissemination of data and information onlineespecially geospatial data. Conversely, the commercialization of public data and information on an exclusive basis produces de facto public monopolies that have inherent economic inefficiencies and are contrary to the public interest on other social, ethical, and good governance grounds. Ethical. The public has already paid for the production of the information. Burden of additional access fees falls disproportionately on the individuals least able to pay. Open access benefits the poor. Political. Transparency of governance is undermined by restricting citizens from access to and use of public data and information. Rights of freedom of expression and information are compromised by restrictions on re-dissemination of public information, particularly of factual data.

Open Data for Global Science Legitimate restrictions on public access to government data National security and public safety Personal privacy Confidentiality Respecting proprietary rights of private-sector parties Not competing directly with the private sector

Open Data for Global Science Existing information commons models: Open-source software movement (e.g., Linux and 10Ks of other programs worldwide, many of which originated in academia for research applications); Distributed Grid computing or e-science (e.g., Open data centers and archives (e.g., GenBank, space science data centers); Federated open data networks (e.g., World Data Center system, NASA DAACs, Global Biodiversity Information Facility); Open access journals (e.g., PLOS + > 2500 scholarly journals, many in developing worldSciELO, Bioline International); Open repositories for an institutions scholarly works (e.g., the Indian Institute for Science, + > 300 formally registered globally) Open repositories for publications in a specific subject area (e.g., the physics arXiv, CogPrints, PubMedCentral); Free university curricula online (e.g., the MIT OpenCourseWare); Emerging discipline or applications commons and integrated knowledge environments (e.g., conservation commons, neurocommons).

Open Data for Global Science OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Public Research Data: Openness Flexibility Transparency Legal conformity (with other existing laws) Protection of intellectual property (when necessary) Formal responsibility Professionalism Interoperability Quality Security Efficiency Accountabilty Sustainability

Open Data for Global Science Additional works by the author on this topic (all available freely online): Bits of Power: Issues in Global Access to Scientific Data (NAS, 1997) The Role of S&T Data and Information in the Public Domain (NAS, 2003) Reichman, J.H. and Paul F. Uhlir, A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment, 66 Law & Contemporary Problems (2003) UNESCO Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Governmental Public Domain Information (2004) Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science (NAS, 2004) Strategies for Open Access to and Preservation of Scientific Data in China (NAS, 2006) Uhlir & Schröder, Open Data for Global Science, Data Science Journal, CODATA, (2007).