Eurocean November /14 Marine knowledge in integrated maritime policy Iain Shepherd European Commission

General Objective To create the optimal conditions for the sustainable use of the oceans and seas, as well as the sustainable growth in maritime sectors and coastal regions through the promotion of coherent and integrated decision making in relation to the seas coastal regions and maritime industries. Eurocean November /14

Indicators GDP in maritime industries meeting requirements of Marine Strategy Framework Directive Unemployment in coast Eurocean November /14

Specific Objective 1 To drive forward the shift from sectoral to holistic decision making in maritime affairs at sea basin, Member state regional and international level, through the promotion of integrated governance and spatial planning. Eurocean November /11 Plans for Arctic Baltic Mediterranean

Specific Objective 2 To increase operational efficiency, stimulate innovation and reduce uncertainty for those working on marine and maritime matters by developing tools which cut across sea or coastal related sectoral policies, including the integration of cross-border and cross- sectoral surveillance activities through a common information sharing environment and facilitating the sharing, re-use and dissemination of marine data and knowledge to industry, public authorities and the research community. Eurocean November /14

EIONET, Guy Fawkes /19 spending on marine monitoring organisationturnoverData spend SHOM75 mil24.8 mi INSU CNRSn/a IRD219 mil6mil IPEV23 mil20.7 mil CNES1423 mil15 mil CLS24.54 miln/a IFREMER230 mil70 mil E-SURFMAR0.82million0.13 mil CETMEF0.335 mil0.134 mil Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris34 mil7.69 mil SOMLITn/a1.3 mil CNRS University de Perpignan0.3millionn/a Université de la Rochelle, CRMMn/a Bureau Gravimetrique Intl0.15 mil mil Total mil139.9 mil

EIONET, Guy Fawkes /19 What do they use it for? reasonprivateauthorityresearchother behaviour of the planet coastal protection exploit resources inform the public marine management national defence01010 new developments promote or support tourism0315 regulatory requirement safe navigation teaching students84238

EIONET, Guy Fawkes /19 why marine data is underused Discovery of Data. –Especially difficult outside your own community Access to data. –Confidentiality –Desire of owners to exploit added-value themselves Use of data. –Often restricted to research Cost of data. –Landsat fiasco Coherence of Data. –Especially cross-disciplinary and cross-border Quality of Data. –Data unaccompanied by precision estimates is useless Quantity of Data. –Are we undersampling?

Marine Knowledge Objectives to reduce operational costs –private industry –public decision-making –marine scientific research to increase competition to reduce uncertainty Eurocean November /14

GMES MyOcean 6 November /9 what is going on now ParametercollectionassemblingApplication bathymetryur-EMODNETWISE marine geologyur-EMODNET physicsGMES (space)GMES (except near coast)GMES fisheries (including fisheries economy) Data Collection RegulationJRCICES Chemistryur-EMODNETWISE-Marine biologyur-EMODNETWISE Marine human activity (other than fisheries) WISE Marine coastal and maritime economy (except fisheries) Eurostat

EIONET, Guy Fawkes /19 tentative architecture Accredited data centres 1.the secure, long term, curation of key marine data sets 2.make available clear, searchable information on their data holdings. European Disciplinary Groups 1.access to all raw observations held at data centres within that discipline 2.data layers indicating density of observation, quality of data, 3.seamless (gridded or polygon) data layers over whole sea basins. Sea-Basin Checkpoints 1.check these data layers, 2. ensure that the data from each disciplinary group are mutually compatible 3.define priorities for further observations based on interaction with local Steering Committee assemble the sea-basin priorities to draw up a set of overall priorities for further action Secretariat1.prepare meetings, 2. manage contracts with the disciplinary groups and sea-basin checkpoints, 3.ensure deadlines are met 4. prepare an annual report of activity to the Commission.

impact IMPACT Cost or benefit assembling+ collection Reduced operational costs benefit250 million Increased competition benefit 60 million million Reduced uncertainty benefit220 million Increased implementation costs Cost20 million 10million- 90million Eurocean November /14

Next steps November 2009Impact assessment Board February 2010Commission Communication Eurocean November /14

objectives –raise awareness –forge sea-basin identity –clarify spatial dimension of EU policies web-based first version April 2010 Eurocean November /11