The FHA Domain Is a Modular Phosphopeptide Recognition Motif

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Advertisements

Anti-idiotype RNAs that mimic the leucine-rich nuclear export signal and specifically bind to CRM1/exportin 1  Jörg Hamm, Maarten Fornerod  Chemistry.
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The C2 Domain of PKCδ Is a Phosphotyrosine Binding Domain
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins 
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Feng Zhang, Jiazhong Shi, Chunjing Bian, Xiaochun Yu  Cell Reports 
Wolfgang Vogel, Gerald D Gish, Frauke Alves, Tony Pawson 
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Lcd1p Recruits Mec1p to DNA Lesions In Vitro and In Vivo
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Distinct Roles for CTD Ser-2 and Ser-5 Phosphorylation in the Recruitment and Allosteric Activation of Mammalian mRNA Capping Enzyme  C.Kiong Ho, Stewart.
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Role of the regulatory domain of the EGF-receptor cytoplasmic tail in selective binding of the clathrin-associated complex AP-2  Werner Boll, Andreas.
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
The Drosophila CLOCK Protein Undergoes Daily Rhythms in Abundance, Phosphorylation, and Interactions with the PER–TIM Complex  Choogon Lee, Kiho Bae,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Frida E. Kleiman, James L. Manley  Cell 
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Phosphorylation of the pro-apoptotic protein BAD on serine 155, a novel site, contributes to cell survival  K. Virdee, P.A. Parone, A.M. Tolkovsky  Current.
Expression of dominant-negative RasN17 completely suppresses Ras activation in Rh1 cells. Expression of dominant-negative RasN17 completely suppresses.
Unassembled Ig Heavy Chains Do Not Cycle from BiP In Vivo but Require Light Chains to Trigger Their Release  Marc Vanhove, Young-Kwang Usherwood, Linda.
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

The FHA Domain Is a Modular Phosphopeptide Recognition Motif Daniel Durocher, Julia Henckel, Alan R Fersht, Stephen P Jackson  Molecular Cell  Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 387-394 (September 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80340-8

Figure 1 The FHA1 Domain of Rad53p Binds to Phosphorylated Rad9p Extracts (1 mg protein) from cultures treated with MMS or 4-NQO as indicated were incubated in the presence of equal amounts (500 ng) of immobilized GST–FHA1, GST–FHA2, GST–FHA1(R70A), GST–FHA1(H88A), GST–FHA2, or GST–FHA2(R605A), as indicated. The fusion protein complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting with an anti-Rad9p polyclonal antiserum. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 387-394DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80340-8)

Figure 2 The FHA1 Domain Binds to Phosphorylated Rad9p by Recognizing a Phosphoepitope (A) List of the peptides used in this study. Note that peptides, except for the H2A.X-derived peptides, are biotinylated and contain the linker Ser-Gly-Ser-Gly between the biotin group and the N terminus of the peptide sequence given. Thr-18 of p53 has been shown to be targeted by DNA-PK, at least in vitro (N. Lakin, personal communication). (B, C, and D) Competition of the FHA1–Rad9 interaction using phosphorylated peptides. Immobilized GST–FHA1 (B and C) or GST–FHA2 (D) was incubated in the presence of 1 mg of protein extracts prepared from MMS-treated cells, in the presence or absence of the indicated peptides. The presence of Rad9p in the FHA–protein complexes was detected by Western blotting. In (C), the Rad9p–FHA1 interaction was competed by increasing amounts of the ST(P) peptide. The relative amount of Rad9p bound was quantitated using the NIH image software, the R square of the logarithmic regression is 0.88. The ST peptide does not compete significantly the FHA1–Rad9p interaction at 500 μM (data not shown). Molecular Cell 1999 4, 387-394DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80340-8)

Figure 3 The FHA1 Domain of Rad53p Binds Directly to Specific Phosphopeptides (A and B) Biotinylated peptide [5 ng; ST, S(P)T, ST(P), as indicated] was incubated with 50 ng of the indicated GST fusion protein. Protein–peptide complexes were retrieved using streptavidin paramagnetic beads and were separated by SDS-PAGE. Fusion proteins were detected by Western blotting using an anti-GST monoclonal antibody. Note that the multiple bands observed in the input lanes correspond to GST–FHA fusion degradation products. One degraded form of GST–FHA1 can still bind the ST(P) peptide, and this form corresponds to a C-terminal truncation of GST–FHA1 that still harbors an intact FHA domain (data not shown). (C and D) The binding of FHA1 to peptides requires a phosphothreonine and the presence of an aspartic acid at position +3. GST–FHA1 (50 ng) was incubated with 5 ng of biotinylated peptides. Peptide–protein complexes were retrieved and analyzed as described in (A). (E) The FHA domain protects the phosphate group from phosphatase activity. λ protein phosphatase was added to binding reactions containing the ST(P) peptide and GST–FHA1 (FHA1) or GST–FHA1(H88A) fusion proteins, and aliquots were taken after 30 and 60 min. Reactions were then stopped with EDTA and were spotted on nitrocellulose. The ST(P) peptide was detected by Western blotting using a phospho-specific p53 Thr18 antibody and was quantitated using the NIH image software. Each point of the graph represents the mean of a duplicate. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 387-394DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80340-8)

Figure 4 The FHA1 Domain Binds Specific Phosphopeptides with High Affinity (A) Binding of wild-type FHA1 to the ST(P) peptide using ITC. The titrations and the calculations leading to the KD, enthalpy (ΔH) as well as the stoichiometry per FHA unit (N) were performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. (B) Binding of wild-type FHA1 to the peptides ST, ST(P)+3A, ST(P)5A, ST(P), SS(P), and S(P)T measured by SPR. Binding experiments were performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. (C) Comparison of wild-type FHA1 and mutants (R70A, H88A, or E117A) binding to phosphorylated peptide ST(P). Binding experiments were performed and analyzed as described in (B). Molecular Cell 1999 4, 387-394DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80340-8)

Figure 5 The FHA Domain Is a Modular Phosphopeptide Recognition Motif GST fusion proteins corresponding to FHA1 and FHA1(H88A) (B); FHA2 and FHA2(R605A) (C); KAPP (accession number 1709235) (D); KIAA0170 (accession number 1136400) (E); Yhr115cp (accession number S48957) (F); and MtuCY1A11.16C (accession number 2496539) (G) were tested for their ability to bind to biotinylated degenerate peptide libraries, described in (A), immobilized on streptavidin-coated chips. The binding activity was measured by SPR and expressed as corrected resonance units (RU). Molecular Cell 1999 4, 387-394DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80340-8)