Conclusion – Truth and wisdom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theories of Knowledge Knowledge is Justified-True-Belief Person, S, knows a proposition, y, iff: Y is true; S believes y; Y is justified for S. (Note:
Advertisements

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
CRITICAL READING AND THINKING BBI 3420 Semester /09 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Pragmatism developed in the U.S. after the Civil War (ca. 1865) no longer content merely to reflect European philosophy a new approach for a new and vigorous.
THERE IS NO GENERAL METHOD OR FORMULA WHICH IS ‘CORRECT’. YOU CAN PROBABLY IGNORE SOME OF THIS ADVICE AND STILL WRITE A GOOD ESSAY… BUT FOLLOWING IT MAY.
Plato BC The Republic Updated, 10/3/07.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 4 Ways of knowing – Perception.
The Problems of Knowledge
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE LESSON 1 The Problem of Knowledge 1.
Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?
Conclusion Chapter 14 TOK II. 3 Theories Regarding Truth (1) Correspondence Theory – truth is as it appears to be – facts are facts. (1) Correspondence.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The Introduction 1.  ABOUT THE SUBJECT  THE main question in TOK is ‘How do you know?’.  TOK course encourages you to think critically.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
2 + 2 = 4 Your mother loves you. Death is a part of life. The sky is blue.
ToK ESSAY The instructions tell you to: Remember to centre your essay on knowledge issues and,where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE. K IS A JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF JUSTIFIED:Justify belief in the right kind of way to be reliable. TRUE: Beyond reasonable doubt ( objective.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 10 Areas of knowledge – History.
History as an Area of Knowledge.
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
Successful communication in team building. Communicating in the work place People are often prone to moralising in discussions/confrontations whether.
And the search for truth. Knowledge. Knowing: Introduction to a classification scheme In ToK we may treat knowledge as falling into 3 categories. These.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
BC The Republic is one of Plato’s longer works (more than 450 pages in length). It is written in dialogue form (as are most of Plato’s books),
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge. Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?
Some Philosophical Orientations of Educational Research You Do What You Think, I Think.
Scientific Method. Science: Further Info Science cannot provide certain (100%) proof – just the ‘best’ working theories based on the evidence that we.
Philosophy 219 Introduction to Moral Theory. Theoretical vs. Practical  One of the ways in which philosophers (since Aristotle) subdivide the field of.
Lesson Objectives: Explain the importance of reflective practice in continuously improving the quality of service provided (Outcome 2.1) Describe how.
ASSE3211: Learning Outcome Assessment 2
Part 4 Reading Critically
Tutors:Maureen McLachlan & Joanne Duval
Introduction to Moral Theory
Sample Surveys.
What is feedback?. Giving feedback “ module 17” By: Rana Rihan Submitted to: Dr Suzan Arafat.
Unit 3 General exam advice
What do we mean by the word “knowledge?”
Personal Power 6: Value and belief system
SCIENCE & KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD
What is “Employability” and how do I develop it?
Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership
USING ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS AND DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by: Sabrina Symons.
The Religious Point of View
Thinking like a Scientist
How do we know things? The Scientific Method
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Epistemic Vice and Motivation
How can I be sure I know something?
What does the word ‘box’ mean?
Lesson Plan The BIG picture? Stickability!
Supportive evidence – different forms of myths to convey meaning: creation myths; myths of good against evil; heroic myths. Myths help to overcome.
Chapter Fourteen The Persuasive Speech.
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Introduction to Epistemology
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Chapter 3 The Idea Of Causation on Social Research
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
The nature of knowledge
Philosophy April 19th Objective Opener
Zimbabwe 2008 Critical Thinking.
Knowers and knowing: Nature of knowledge
Religious faith and emotion
Presentation transcript:

Conclusion – Truth and wisdom Chapter 14 Conclusion – Truth and wisdom p. 439 © Cambridge University Press 2011

© Cambridge University Press 2011 What is truth? Correspondence theory Coherence theory Pragmatic theory Discussion: Summary table of theories on p. 447 of the Coursebook. © Cambridge University Press 2011

© Cambridge University Press 2011 Can we know the truth? Our picture of the world is always an interpretation. We can never be sure that our interpretation is true. p. 447 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Limitations of our knowledge tools Perception: if our senses had evolved differently, our perception of the world would be different. Language: there will always be aspects of reality that words cannot describe adequately. Emotion: just because you believe something passionately does not guarantee it is true. Reason: there may be things that we are not intelligent enough to understand. p. 448 Discussion: Activity 14.7, p. 448 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Are we getting closer to the truth? Perhaps – you might insist that knowledge progresses over time and that we are at least getting closer to the truth. But the success of the quest for knowledge in the past is no guarantee that it will continue to be successful in the future. How can we be sure that the laws of nature will continue to work in the future? Perhaps the ‘great truths’ we have discovered will turn out to be nothing more than anomalies. p. 448 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Beyond dogmatism and relativism (1) Dogmatism = stating your opinions in a strong way and not accepting the views of others. Maybe the world could be a better place if people held their views with a little humility. p. 449 Discussion: Activity 14.8, p. 449 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Beyond dogmatism and relativism (2) The lure of relativism Relativism = there is no absolute truth. There is just individual truth (my truth and your truth). Criticisms: Just because you are not certain of the truth does not mean it does not exist. If you accept everyone’s truth, there are no grounds for evaluating whether something is true or not and everything is reduced to personal preferences. The statement ‘There is no truth,’ refutes itself as soon as you ask if it is true. © Cambridge University Press 2011

© Cambridge University Press 2011 Degrees of truth Truth may be seen as an unattainable ideal which we can be nearer to or further away from. p. 451 Discussion: Activity 14.9, p. 451 © Cambridge University Press 2011

The cubist theory of truth The more perspectives you have on something, the nearer you are to the truth about it. Just because truth varies with perspective does not mean there is no truth at all. Different views can enrich our understanding of the truth. This avoids: the error of dogmatism → mistaking a half-truth for the truth the error of relativism → thinking that since truth varies with perspective there is no truth at all. p. 452 © Cambridge University Press 2011

© Cambridge University Press 2011 What price truth? It is often assumed that truth is a good thing (for example, Socrates linked knowledge to happiness and virtue). However, does the cost of seeking knowledge sometimes outweigh the benefits? p. 452 Discussion: Activity 14.10, p. 452 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Do we naturally seek the truth? Children are naturally curious, but they are also naturally willing to believe what they are told. People seem to have defence mechanisms to protect them from unwelcome truth, such as: selective attention: seeing what they want to see rationalisation: finding bad reasons to justify prejudices communal reinforcement: only mixing with people who share the same views. There is no reason to believe that the truth will make us happy. However, the longer we avoid the truth, the bigger the nasty surprises may be later. p. 453 Discussion: Activity 14.11, p. 454 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Ought we to seek the truth? Time and money spent searching for truth could be better spent, e.g. when people are dying of thirst and starvation. New technologies may have huge potential benefits, but also present huge dangers if used badly. p. 454–5 Discussion: Activity 14.12, p. 456 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Five key features of wisdom (1) 1 Good judgement This comes with experience plus reflection on experience. 2 Breadth of vision Narrow specialisation of knowledge may not result in a sense of the whole. TOK puts emphasis on comparing and contrasting claims in different areas of knowledge. 3 Self-knowledge This makes us question beliefs and avoid prejudice. p. 456 © Cambridge University Press 2011

Five key features of wisdom (2) 4 Responsibility Almost any statement we accept requires that we are willing to trust others. When we pass on knowledge we should therefore exercise responsibility to: base knowledge claims on evidence be consistent be open to criticism. 5 Intellectual humility Absolute knowledge is beyond the intellectual and perceptual ability of humans. Socrates and Newton recognised their own relative ignorance (learned ignorance – achieved after a lifetime of thought). Discussion: ‘Trying to make sense of the world is not to reach a destination but to travel with a different point of view.’ Linking questions: p. 462 Reading resources: Ghosts p. 463 Integrity p. 465 © Cambridge University Press 2011