The Drosophila Protein Dof Is Specifically Required for FGF Signaling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Advertisements

Sex-Specific Deployment of FGF Signaling in Drosophila Recruits Mesodermal Cells into the Male Genital Imaginal Disc  Shaad M. Ahmad, Bruce S. Baker 
Jelly belly Cell Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Control of Organ Asymmetry in Flowers of Antirrhinum
Volume 10, Issue 16, Pages (August 2000)
Carlos Ribeiro, Marc Neumann, Markus Affolter  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
All Mouse Ventral Spinal Cord Patterning by Hedgehog Is Gli Dependent and Involves an Activator Function of Gli3  C.Brian Bai, Daniel Stephen, Alexandra.
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
HUA1 and HUA2 Are Two Members of the Floral Homeotic AGAMOUS Pathway
Drosophila fizzy-related Down-Regulates Mitotic Cyclins and Is Required for Cell Proliferation Arrest and Entry into Endocycles  Stephan J Sigrist, Christian.
A Novel MAP Kinase Regulates Flagellar Length in Chlamydomonas
Tribbles, a cell-cycle brake that coordinates proliferation and morphogenesis during Drosophila gastrulation  Thomas C. Seher, Maria Leptin  Current Biology 
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Numb Inhibits Membrane Localization of Sanpodo, a Four-Pass Transmembrane Protein, to Promote Asymmetric Divisions in Drosophila  Kate M. O'Connor-Giles,
Qiong Wang, Mirka Uhlirova, Dirk Bohmann  Developmental Cell 
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Single-Cell Transcript Analysis of Pancreas Development
Branchless Encodes a Drosophila FGF Homolog That Controls Tracheal Cell Migration and the Pattern of Branching  David Sutherland, Christos Samakovlis,
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
Qiong A. Liu, Michael O. Hengartner  Current Biology 
Numb Inhibits Membrane Localization of Sanpodo, a Four-Pass Transmembrane Protein, to Promote Asymmetric Divisions in Drosophila  Kate M. O'Connor-Giles,
In Vivo Imaging Reveals Different Cellular Functions for FGF and Dpp Signaling in Tracheal Branching Morphogenesis  Carlos Ribeiro, Andreas Ebner, Markus.
Elizabeth H. Chen, Eric N. Olson  Developmental Cell 
Chun-Pyn Shen, Lily Y Jan, Yuh Nung Jan  Cell 
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
FGF8-like1 and FGF8-like2 Encode Putative Ligands of the FGF Receptor Htl and Are Required for Mesoderm Migration in the Drosophila Gastrula  Tanja Gryzik,
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Isoprenoids Control Germ Cell Migration Downstream of HMGCoA Reductase
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Karen G Hales, Margaret T Fuller  Cell 
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
New Roundabouts Send Axons into the Fas Lane
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Satoko Nishimoto, Susan M. Wilde, Sophie Wood, Malcolm P.O. Logan 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
The Mitotic Arrest in Response to Hypoxia and of Polar Bodies during Early Embryogenesis Requires Drosophila Mps1  Matthias G. Fischer, Sebastian Heeger,
Dpl-1 DP and efl-1 E2F Act with lin-35 Rb to Antagonize Ras Signaling in C. elegans Vulval Development  Craig J. Ceol, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Guidance Cues at the Drosophila CNS Midline: Identification and Characterization of Two Drosophila Netrin/UNC-6 Homologs  Robin Harris, Laura Moore Sabatelli,
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Lisa Connell-Crowley, Maude Le Gall, Duc J. Vo, Edward Giniger 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Novel Functions of nanos in Downregulating Mitosis and Transcription during the Development of the Drosophila Germline  Girish Deshpande, Gretchen Calhoun,
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (September 2003)
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Drosophila Dumbfounded
SUR-8, a Conserved Ras-Binding Protein with Leucine-Rich Repeats, Positively Regulates Ras-Mediated Signaling in C. elegans  Derek S Sieburth, Qun Sun,
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2000)
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Numb Antagonizes Notch Signaling to Specify Sibling Neuron Cell Fates
A Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, Dacapo, Is Necessary for Timely Exit from the Cell Cycle during Drosophila Embryogenesis  Joriene C de Nooij, Mary.
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Extracellular Proteins Needed for C. elegans Mechanosensation
Spatial Regulation of Developmental Signaling by a Serpin
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Drosophila Gastrulation: Identification of a Missing Link
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages (October 2003)
Markus Kaspar, Axel Dienemann, Christine Schulze, Frank Sprenger 
The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance  Hung-Hsiang Yu, Houmam H Araj, Sherry A Ralls,
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

The Drosophila Protein Dof Is Specifically Required for FGF Signaling Stéphane Vincent, Robert Wilson, Carmen Coelho, Markus Affolter, Maria Leptin  Molecular Cell  Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 515-525 (October 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3

Figure 1 Defects in Mesoderm and Tracheal Morphogenesis in dof Mutants Stage 16 embryos stained with monoclonal antibody 2A12 to visualize the tracheal lumen. (A) Wild type; (B) btl mutant; (C) dof mutant. (D–G) Cross sections of gastrulating embryos stained with antibodies against Twist to visualize the invaginated mesoderm. In wild-type embryos ([D] and [E], stages 7 and 8), the invaginated mesodermal tube flattens against the ectoderm and then disperses into individual cells that migrate dorsally on the underlying ectoderm. In dof mutants (F and G), the mesodermal tube does not flatten. However, it does disperse into individual cells, and the cells that contact the ectoderm eventually migrate dorsally. This phenotype is identical to that of htl mutants (Gisselbrecht et al. 1996). (H). Rescue of the tracheal defects in a dof mutant embryo by expression of a dof transgene (see Experimental Procedures). (I and J) Dof protein expression in wild type ([I], dof1/+ or +/+) and dof1 (J) mutant embryos from the same staining reaction. The embryos were overstained to allow detection of even the lowest levels of Dof protein. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)

Figure 2 Expression of dof in Developing Embryos (A) dof RNA is first detected at the syncytial blastoderm stage in the region of the mesoderm. (B) Dof remains detectable in the mesoderm until the extended germband but then disappears. (C and D) As dof expression fades in the mesoderm, dof is activated in the tracheal placodes and then the tracheal branches (both panels show a focal plane near the surface of the embryo; brackets, region enlarged in [F]). (E) Toward the end of embryogenesis, expression is seen in some cells in the CNS (possibly glia cells lying on top of the ventral nerve cord), parts of the visceral mesoderm, and a few other locations. (F) Higher magnification of the edge of the germ band of the embryo shown in (C), focused on the mesoderm. While dof RNA has disappeared in most of the mesoderm, it is maintained at low level in the dorsal edge of the mesoderm (white arrows), seen clearly in the regions between the tracheal invaginations, t. (G) Cross section through the embryo shown in (C), showing expression in the invaginated tracheae, t, and in a population of cells migrating along the mesoderm (arrow). (H) Higher magnification of the embryo shown in (D), focused on a deeper plane, showing the migrating cells (arrow). All embryos were hybridized with a probe prepared from a fragment common to both dof transcripts. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)

Figure 3 dof Gene and Protein Structure (A) Diagram of the genomic region containing the dof gene. Restriction sites: S, SacI; H, HindIII; B, BamHI; N, NcoI. The insertion site of the P element in strain P837/10 is indicated by a triangle. The two different splice forms represented by our cDNAs are shown with the specific 5′ exons of transcript I in dark gray, and those of transcript II in light gray. The common 3′ exon is shown as a white box. We have not proven the absence of further upstream exons. The translation start site of the rescuing transcript II is marked by an arrow. (B) Protein sequence translated from the open reading frame of transcript II. The first amino acid shared by the two different splice products (D16) is indicated in bold type. Gray underlay, ankyrin repeats (details in [C]). Gray shaded box, coiled coil region. White box, positively charged cluster. Environments of tyrosines with similarities to known motifs surrounding phosphorylated tyrosines are bold and underlined. The proteins thought to interact with these motifs are indicated in (C). (C) Top, schematic representation of predicted motifs and structures in the Dof protein, showing the position of the ankyrin repeats (gray boxes), the coiled coil (hatched box), the positively charged cluster (white box with +), and six tyrosines, which, judged by their environment, might be binding sites for the proteins indicated above the diagram. The coiled coil structure prediction was according to the algorithm of A. Lupas (Lupas 1996). Bottom, alignment of Dof ankyrin repeats with known ankyrin repeats. Sequences (top to bottom): Dof, human ankyrin 3, human ankyrin R, human hypothetical protein KIAA0148, and mouse Rho-GEF. The numbers at the right are those of the last amino acid shown of each sequence. Amino acid identities to Dof are underlaid in dark gray, and conservative substitutions in light gray. Boxes above the sequence indicate the α helices found in ankyrin repeats; the zig-zag line denotes the sequence in Dof that is predicted to be able to form the β turn of an ankyrin repeat (Gorina and Pavletich 1996; Luh et al. 1997; Batchelor et al. 1998). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)

Figure 4 Activation of ERK in the Mesoderm of Wild-Type and Mutant Embryos Cross sections through embryos during gastrulation, stained with antibodies against dp-ERK (A–C, E, and F) or Dof protein (D). (A–C) When the mesoderm has invaginated, ERK is activated in mesodermal cells adjacent to the ectoderm (arrows). Phosphorylated ERK is also seen in the overlying ectoderm. (D) The cells in the “stem” of the invaginated mesodermal tube, in which ERK is not phosphorylated, do not express Dof. (E and F) In embryos mutant for dof, no ERK activation is seen in the mesoderm, even at later stages, when some mesodermal cells do contact the ectoderm. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)

Figure 5 Effects of Constitutively Active Signaling Molecules on Tracheal Defects in btl and dof Mutants Constitutively active forms of the FGFR Btl (Btl*), the Ras GTPase (Ras*), and the Raf kinase (Raf*) were expressed in the tracheal system of wild-type embryos and of btl and dof mutant embryos. The embryos were stained with antibody 2A12 (A–J) to visualize the tracheae, or (K–T) with an antibody against Drosophila SRF (DSRF), which is activated in the tracheal end cells in response to FGF receptor signaling. Note that expression of Btl* in wild-type embryos (B and L) leads to ectopic expression of DSRF in the tracheae. Arrows indicate examples of excessive terminal branching. Tracheae do not branch (C and G), and DSRF is not expressed (M and Q) in btl or dof mutants. Expression of Ras* or Raf* can induce DSRF expression (O, P, S, and T) and tracheal morphogenesis (E, F, I, and J) in both mutants, showing that activating the signaling cascade at these points circumvents the requirement for the FGFR and for the Dof protein. Btl*, in contrast, rescues these defects in btl mutants (D and N), but not in dof mutants (H and R), showing that even a constitutively active receptor still needs Dof for further transmission of the signal to the MAPK cascade and that Dof thus acts downstream of the FGFR. The phenotypic differences between (D), (E), (F), (I), and (J) are due to variabilty in the phenotypes rather than differences between genotypes. Btl* and Ras* were expressed under the control of the GAL4 driver line btl-GAL4. Raf* was expressed under heat shock control (two heat shocks of 20 min at an interval of 4 hr), and embryos were fixed 4 hr after the second heat treatment. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)

Figure 6 Activation of DSRF by Activated Torso in dof Mutants Embryos stained with monoclonal antibody 2A12 recognizing the tracheal lumen (black arrows) and antibodies against DSRF (white arrows). Expression of a constitutively active Torso receptor (Tor*) in wild-type embryos (A) induces ectopic expression of DSRF in the nuclei of a number of tracheal cells (white arrow); compare to Figure 5K for wild-type control without activated receptor and to Figure 5L for wild-type with activated Btl (Btl*). (B) Expression of activated Torso in a dof mutant, focused on the level of DSRF-expressing cells. The activated Torso receptor is able to induce DSRF (white arrow) and some branching (black arrow) in dof mutants, whereas the activated FGFR Btl (C) does not. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)

Figure 7 Dof Protein Expression and Migration of Gut Muscle Precursor Cells (A–C) Stage 10 embryo stained with antibodies against Dof. (A) Low power ventral view. (B and C) High magnification of individual cells (marked by arrowheads in [A]). The outlines of one cell in each panel are marked by white dots. (D–G) Dof in migrating visceral muscle precursors. Embryos stained with antibodies against Dof (brown) to distinguish wild-type (D and F) from dof mutants (E and G) and against β-galactosidase (blue) to mark a group of mesodermal cells at the posterior end of the germ band (expression of β-galactosidase under control of the croc-promoter). (F and G) The mesodermal cells migrate in an anterior direction and will eventually spread over more than half of the length of the embryo. Even in the absence of Dof (E and G), these cells are able to migrate as efficiently as in the wild type (D and F). White arrow in (D), expression of Dof in the anterior midgut primordium. (H) The migrating visceral mesodermal cells (marked by an arrow) also express the Htl protein. (I) Immunofluorescence labeling shows coexpression of β-galactosidase (red) and Dof (blue) in the migrating cells. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 515-525DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80151-3)