Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Volume 161, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Rewiring Cas9 to Target New PAM Sequences
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Chaoyou Xue, Natalie R. Whitis, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
DNase H Activity of Neisseria meningitidis Cas9
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Takuo Osawa, Hideko Inanaga, Chikara Sato, Tomoyuki Numata 
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Daan C. Swarts, John van der Oost, Martin Jinek  Molecular Cell 
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Addison V. Wright, James K. Nuñez, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell 
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Guide RNA Functional Modules Direct Cas9 Activity and Orthogonality
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 164, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Programmable RNA Cleavage and Recognition by a Natural CRISPR-Cas9 System from Neisseria meningitidis  Beth A. Rousseau, Zhonggang Hou, Max J. Gramelspacher,
Ryan N. Jackson, Blake Wiedenheft  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
RNA-Independent DNA Cleavage Activities of Cas9 and Cas12a
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
Regulatory RNAs in Bacteria
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Hayun Lee, Yi Zhou, David W. Taylor, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
DNA Unwinding Is the Primary Determinant of CRISPR-Cas9 Activity
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Hui Yang, Dinshaw J. Patel  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
RNA Displacement and Resolution of the Transcription Bubble during Transcription by T7 RNA Polymerase  Manli Jiang, Na Ma, Dmitry G. Vassylyev, William.
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages e4 (January 2019)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 295-306 (April 2016) Spatiotemporal Control of Type III-A CRISPR-Cas Immunity: Coupling DNA Degradation with the Target RNA Recognition  Migle Kazlauskiene, Gintautas Tamulaitis, Georgij Kostiuk, Česlovas Venclovas, Virginijus Siksnys  Molecular Cell  Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 295-306 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Closed Circular ssDNA Degradation by StCsm (A) dsDNA and ssDNA substrates used in this study. Protospacer is blue, the complementary strand (matching spacer in crRNA) is red. 3′-flanking sequences of protospacer complementary to 5′-handle of crRNA are green. (B and C) ssDNA cleavage by the binary (B) and ternary (C) StCsm complexes. The reactions contained 5 nM of binary or ternary StCsm and 1 nM of ssDNA. Reactions were initiated by addition of Mn2+ and products were analyzed on agarose gels. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 StCsm Reactions on Single-Stranded Oligodeoxynucleotides and DNA Bubbles (A) Time course of oligodeoxynucleotide degradation: 4 nM of 33P-labeled ssDNA S3/1 (76-mer containing the protospacer) or NS (73-mer lacking a protospacer) were incubated with 200 nM of the binary or ternary StCsm complex in a reaction buffer. Reaction was initiated by addition of 10 mM of MnCl2, aliquots were withdrawn at fixed time and products analyzed in PAAG gels. Rate constants were calculated by fitting single exponentials to the substrate depletion data. Cartoons above the graphs depict reaction components (see Figure 1 legend for color coding). (B) Cleavage of bubbled DNA by the ternary StCsm complex. Ternary StCsm was incubated with DNA duplex containing 36 nt unpaired region. The S3/1-strand (top strand) contains S3 protospacer sequence, the NS-strand (bottom strand) lacks the sequence complementary to the crRNA. Cleavage reactions contained 4 nM of oligoduplex, 33P-labeled either on S3/1-strand or NS-strand (indicated by a star), and 200 nM of the ternary StCsm. Cartoons above the graphs depict reaction components (see Figure 1 legend for color coding). Triangles denote cleavage positions; M, synthetic DNA markers. (C) Rates of the NS-strand degradation by the ternary StCsm. Synthetic DNA duplexes containing unpaired regions of different length (from 36 nt to 1 nt) that produce DNA bubbles of different size or mismatches were incubated with StCsm under the reaction conditions described in (B) and reaction rates were determined as in (A). Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Coupling between RNase and ssDNase Activities of StCsm (A) RNase and ssDNase activities of wild-type (WT) StCsm and RNA-cleavage defficient StCsm (Csm3 D33A) variant. Cleavage of S3/1 RNA and ssDNA was monitored individually in the reaction mixture containing Mn2+ as a cofactor and either 33P-labeled ssDNA or RNA. Reaction conditions were the same as in Figure 2A. (B) Cartoon depicting the experimental strategy to monitor the temporal control of ssDNase activity of the ternary StCsm. First, StCsm ternary complex is mixed with ssM13mp18 DNA, and RNase cleavage is triggered by addition of Mg2+ cofactor. After a certain delay time, the DNase activity is initiated by adding Mn2+. (C) Representative degradation patterns of ssM13mp18 DNA at three different delay times (0, 10, and 70 min, respectively). (D) Delay time dependence of degradation rates of ssM13mp18 DNA by the WT StCsm and RNA-cleavage deficient StCsm (Csm3 D33A) variant. DNA degradation rates were determined after the indicated delay times as described in Figure 2. (E) kcat calculation for RNA hydrolysis by StCsm. Multiple turnover reactions contained 4 nM 5′-labeled RNA S3/1 and 0.08–0.8 nM StCsm. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of Cas10 Mutations on the ssDNase Activity of StCsm (A) Domain architecture of the S. thermophilus Cas10 protein. HD-domain denotes HD-type phosphohydrolase/nuclease domain (blue); Pol-domain denotes polymerase/cyclase-like domain (green). Conserved residues characteristic of the different domains and subject to alanine mutagenesis are indicated above the boxes. (B) ssDNA cleavage by the WT StCsm and StCsm complexes containing Cas10 mutant variants. Reaction components are depicted using the same color scheme as in Figure 1. Cleavage reactions contained 4 nM of 33P-labeled ssDNA NS and 200 nM of ternary StCsm. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Activator RNA Requirements for the ssDNA Cleavage by the StCsm (A–G) Cartoons above gels depict ternary StCsm complexes that differ by RNA molecules. The agarose gels show degradation patterns of 1 nM of circular ssDNA M13mp18 in the presence of 5 nM ternary StCsm complexes containing different RNAs (see Figure 1 legend for color coding). Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structural Arrangement of the StCsm Complex (A) 3D model of the StCsm complex (Csm1-5). crRNA and target RNA are shown with their surface shown as orange and yellow, respectively. ssDNA bound to the active site of the HD-domain is shown in pink. Csm subunits appear in different colors. Side chains of the Csm3 active site residues (D33) are shown in red. (B) The nucleotide-binding site in the GGDD-domain. Residues contributing to the nucleotide binding are shown with their side chains. (C) The active site of the HD-domain of Cas10 complexed with ssDNA fragment. Side chains of residues involved in coordination of two metal ions (magenta balls) are shown in yellow. (D) crRNA bound to Csm4. crRNA 5′-handle is depicted red, green shows a complementary RNA fragment that could bind to the 4–7 nt of crRNA ensuring self versus non-self discrimination. (E) Same as in (D), with depicted molecular surface of the Csm4 model colored according to electrostatic potential (blue, positive; red, negative). (F) A schematic representation of self target RNA recognition by crRNA. RNA colors and nucleotide numbers are the same as those in (D) and (E). Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Mechanisms of Immunity Provided by the Type III-A CRISPR-Cas System (A) Possible in vivo mechanism for NA interference by the type III-A Csm complex. When foreign DNA enters the cell, transcription is initiated to establish the phage infection. If transcription occurs through the region containing a protospacer, the nascent phage mRNA emerging from the transcription complex becomes a target for the StCsm complex. RNA transcript binding by StCsm complex activates Cas10 protein for in cis degradation of the non-template ssDNA emerging from the transcription bubble. Subsequent target RNA degradation represses ssDNase activity of the StCsm. (B) Self-DNA discrimination by the type III system of S. thermophilus. Pre-crRNA transcribed from P promoter on the template strand of host CRISPR array does not bind crRNA and therefore will not activate Cas10 ssDNase. In case of bidirectional transcription through the CRISPR array, anti-precrRNA transcribed from a putative promoter P(−) on the non-template strand will bind to the StCsm-complex due to complementarity to crRNA. However, complementary between the crRNA 5′-handle and 3′- flanking sequence will repress ssDNase activity protecting host DNA from cleavage. (C) Non-self DNA degradation by the type III system of S. thermophilus. In case of phage infection RNA transcribed from the P1 promoter on the template strand crRNA will base-pair to the spacer region but not to the 5′-handle of Csm complex, and therefore will activate phage DNA degradation by the Cas10 ssDNase. In case of phage RNA transcription from the putative promoter on the non-template strand, resulting RNA will be resistant to cleavage by the Csm complex. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 295-306DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.024) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions