Jessina C. McGregor, PhD; Miriam R. Elman, MPH; David T

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bill Stockdale, MBA, Celeste Beck, MPH, Lisa Hulbert, PharmD, Wu Xu, PhD Utah Department of Health Comparison with other methods of analysis: 1) Assessing.
Advertisements

2.4 ICD-9-CM Chapter-Specific Guidelines Chapter guidelines refer to the chapters in the ICD-9 manual The ICD-9 manual contains 17 chapters plus sections.
Don’t Be Afraid of ICD-10 Melonie Loutsch, CPC, ACS-EM April 26 th 2014.
Racial and Geographic Variations in the Use of Tympanostomy Tubes in Young Children in the United States Lawrence C. Kleinman, MD, MPH Departments of Health.
1 Lauren E. Finn, 2 Seth Sheffler-Collins, MPH, 2 Marcelo Fernandez-Viña, MPH, 2 Claire Newbern, PhD, 1 Dr. Alison Evans, ScD., 1 Drexel University School.
4 Diagnostic Coding: Introduction to ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Lecture 2.
ICD-9 Coding to ICD-10 Coding WINMED HIS Version 8 Intermed Systems, Inc.
Patient Characteristics and the Use of Health Care Services by Persons with HIV Esther Hing and Christine Lucas, Ambulatory and Hospital Care Statistics.
Electronic Medical Record Use and the Quality of Care in Physician Offices National Conference on Health Statistics August 17, 2010 Chun-Ju (Janey) Hsiao,
Physician Acceptance of New Medicaid Patients by State in 2011 Sandra Decker, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics NCHS National.
Frequency of Asthma Education in Primary Care for the Years Marquise Lee, MSCR 1, Kevin Cross, PharmD, MSCR 1, Wan Yu Yang, MSCR 1, Michael Jiroutek,
TRANSLATING VISITS INTO PATIENTS USING AMBULATORY VISIT DATA (Hypertensive patient case study) by Esther Hing, M.P.H. and Julia Holmes, Ph.D U.S. DEPARTMENT.
Copyright © 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2002 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Slide 1 CHAPTER 4 USING ICD-9-CM.
Colorado Medicaid Medicaid Readmissions Judy Zerzan, MD, MPH Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing 1Zerzan.
Medical Coding Chapter 4.
Analyzing NCHS Drug Data Amy B. Bernstein, Sc.D. Presented at the NCHS Board of Scientific Counselors Meeting January 28, 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Readmissions for Medicaid Patients: State-Level Benchmarks and Initiatives AHRQ Annual Conference September 10, 2012 David Kelley, M.D., M.P.A. Office.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services, Policy, and Management 1 Drug Treatment Disparities Among African Americans Living with HIV/AIDS Carleen.
The Developments and Applications of Disease-based Statistics in Taiwan Pi-Joen Lee Statistics Office Department of Health Oecd/Korea.
1 Copyright © 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2002 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Slide 1 CHAPTER 7 AN OVERVIEW OF ICD-10-CM.
Focus Area 17: Medical Product Safety Progress Review November 5, 2003.
Hospital racial segregation and racial disparity in mortality after injury Melanie Arthur University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Figure 1. Total population, population 65 years and over and 75 years and over: United States, NOTE: See Data Table for data points graphed and.
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Pediatric Antipsychotic Use by FDA Labeled/Off-label Status MARYLAND CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN REGULATORY SCIENCE & INNOVATION.
HIV Surveillance in Urban and Nonurban Areas through 2013 National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD & TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention.
Cheryl Meddles-Torres, DNP, RN, FNP-C Shuang Hu
Slide 1 Copyright © 2014 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. CHAPTER 2 AN OVERVIEW OF ICD-10-CM.
Created by Alejandra Munoz, CPC, NCICS INTRODUCTION TO ICD-10-CM.
Co-occurring Mental Illness and Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Among Adults with Obesity and Chronic Physical Illness Chan Shen, MA. MS. Usha.
An Audit to Determine if Prescribers are Reviewing Antimicrobial Prescriptions Hours After Initiation. Natalie Holman, Emma Cramp, Joy Baruah Hinchingbrooke.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Injury and illness episodes.
Should Oklahoma be concerned about parasitic zoonoses? Jean Thompson, MPH 1 Lauri Smithee, MES, MS 1 Hélène Carabin, DVM, MSc, PhD 2 Oklahoma State Department.
2016 Annual Data Report, Vol 2, ESRD, Ch 5
R. Papani, A. G. Duarte, Y-L. Lin, G. Sharma
Rory M Marks, John Z Ayanian, Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Axis I Clinical Disorders at Gangguan Klinis :
Quality of Electronic Emergency Department Data: How Good Are They?
Best Practice: Urgent Care PQRS.
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PATIENT ACTIVATION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS
ICD-9- CM codes.
American Public Health Association Annual Meeting
Larissa Grigoryan, MD, PhD Family and Community Medicine
Presentation for the SCTR Scientific Retreat on Aging Related Research
One-Year Readmission Risk and Mortality after Hip Fracture Surgery: A National Population-Based Study in Taiwan Tien-Ching Lee 1, 2, 8 ;Pei-Shan Ho 4 ;Hui-Tzu.
National Estimate of the cost of Parkinson’s Disease Medications
2017 Annual Data Report Healthy People 2020.
Clinical differences between freestanding and hospital-based emergency departments May 18, 2017 Ryan C. Burke, MPH.
Believed discrimination occurred because of their:
BURDEN OF ILLNESS IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL EXPENDITURE PANEL SURVEY (MEPS) DATA Pratyusha Vadagam, MS Candidate,1 Khalid.
Robert M. Saywell, Jr., PhD, MPH Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH
PHQ2 Screening Negative PHQ2 Screening Positive
Antimicrobial Therapy (Vancomycin and/or Metronidazole)
Roland C. Merchant, MD, MPH, ScD
CHAPTER 4 USING ICD-9-CM SXS11ierPPT-INTC04_P1.
Department of Health Management and Informatics
Volume 2: End-Stage Renal Disease Chapter 4: Hospitalization
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
Mary Jo Bowie MS, BS, AAS, RHIA, RHIT
Representativeness of Emergency Department Data Reported to the BioSense System Patrick Minor, M.S.P.H., Roseanne English, B.S., Jerome Tokars, M.D, M.P.H.
Peng-jun Lu, MD, PhD1; Mei-Chun Hung, MPH, PhD1,2 ; Alissa C
Characteristics of Patients who Choose to Participate in a Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) Program: Implication for Program Structure and Processes.
AIDS Trends   For all slides in this series, the following notes apply:
Mary Jo Bowie MS, BS, AAS, RHIA, RHIT
Toktobaeva B, Karymbaeva S Drug Information Centre Kyrgyzstan
Abstract Decreased Inappropriate Antibiotic Use Following a Korean National Policy to Prohibit Medication Dispensing by Physicians Sylvia Park, PhD; Stephen.
Alzheimer’s Disease in New Mexico
Premiere Continuing Education
Khai Hoan Tram, Jane O’Halloran, Rachel Presti, Jeffrey Atkinson
Presentation transcript:

Antibiotic Prescribing in Ambulatory Settings without a Documented Indication Jessina C. McGregor, PhD; Miriam R. Elman, MPH; David T. Bearden, PharmD Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy Abstract (updated) Background: Retrospective review of antimicrobial prescribing depends upon adequate documentation of the indication for therapy. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in the absence of a documented indication using nationally representative data from the ambulatory setting. Methods: We used data from the 2009 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which represent over 1.2 billion ambulatory visits in emergency, hospital, and clinic-based ambulatory settings. Among patients with an antibiotic prescription, we identified the proportion without an ICD-9 diagnosis code for a bacterial infection or possible bacterial infection. We compared this proportion across ambulatory settings and patient age groups (chi-square test). Patients without a clear indication for an antibiotic were further characterized by diagnoses and antibiotics prescribed. Results: Antibiotics were prescribed in 158,615,007 (12.5%) of U.S. ambulatory visits in 2009. Of these, 54,197,236 (34.2%) had no documented diagnosis of a bacterial infection. Patients over 64 years old were significantly more likely (p<0.01) to be prescribed an antibiotic in absence of a clear indication compared to pediatric patients and younger adults; however, prescribing did not vary by clinical setting (p=0.76). A documented indication was absence in 22.6%, 20.2%, 15.1%, 10.5% and 9.8% of visits with a cephalosporin, quinolone, penicillin, sulfonamide, and macrolide prescription, respectively. Conclusion: While patients without documentation of a bacterial infection may have other valid indications for antibiotic therapy (e.g., prophylactic use), there remains a large proportion of ambulatory visits in which antibiotic use may be unwarranted. While further study is needed to ensure the validity of these findings, a documented indication for antibiotic prescribing is critical for promoting prudent antibiotic use in this setting. Results Figure 2. Primary diagnosis for visits without documented indication for an antibiotic Primary Diagnosis Category % Infectious & Parasitic Diseases (Non-bacterial) 3.0 Neoplasms 3.8 Endocrine, Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases & Immunity Disorders 3.6 Diseases of Blood & Blood-Forming Organs 0.7 Mental Disorders 1.8 Diseases of Nervous System & Sense Organs 3.2 Diseases of Circulatory System 6.6 Diseases of Respiratory System 6.9 Diseases of Digestive System 7.6 Diseases of Genitourinary System 4.6 Complications of Pregnancy, Childbirth & Puerperium 0.3 Diseases of Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue 8.1 Diseases of Musculoskeletal System & Connective Tissue 5.7 Congenital Anomalies 0.9 Certain Conditions Originating in Perinatal Period 0.0 Symptoms, Signs, & Ill-Defined Conditions 14.0 Injury & Poisoning 12.4 V Codes 13.9 Other/blank* An indication was absent in 34.2% of ambulatory visits in the U.S. that had an antibiotic prescription Table 1 describes visits with an antibiotic prescription. Absence of a documented indication was Significantly higher in males and adults over 64 years (both p≤0.01) Significantly lower in patients paying with private insurance (p<0.01) Presence of an indication did not differ by race, ethnicity, setting type, or region (p=0.14, p=0.36, p=0.76, and p=0.98, respectively) Table 2 lists the primary diagnosis categories of visits without an indicated antibiotic Symptoms, Signs, Ill-defined conditions; V codes; & Injury codes were most frequent Figure 1 displays the most common antibiotic classes prescribed without documented indication Cephalosporins, quinolones, penicillins & sulfonamides each represent over 10% of visits Table 1. Characteristics of visits with an antibiotic prescription* Indication No Indication Characteristic % Sex* Female 67.5 32.5 Male 63.5 36.5 Age group* Under 18 years 80.5 19.4 18 – 64 years 62.3 37.7 65 years and older 50.7 49.1 Race White only 66.9 33.1 Black/African American only 59.7 40.3 Asian/Pacific Islander only 62.6 37.4 More than one race 77.5 22.5 Other/missing 66.1 33.9 Ethnicity Hispanic 70.9 29.1 Not Hispanic 65.4 34.6 Missing 65.1 34.9 Setting type Physician's office 65.6 33.8 Emergency medicine department 63.8 36.0 Hospital outpatient department 34.3 Insurance type* Private 70.7 28.8 Medicaid/Medicare 59.8 40.2 Self-pay 56.0 43.9 Other 54.9 45.1 Unknown/blank 66.0 45.6 Region Northeast 65.0 35.0 Midwest 65.2 34.8 South 66.4 33.6 West Background Antibiotic stewardship efforts are expanding to increase appropriate & prudent antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory settings In some healthcare systems a documented indication is required for all antibiotic prescriptions Electronic health record alerts can be triggered by diagnosis and antibiotic combinations In the absence of a documented indication, appropriateness of antibiotic selection cannot be evaluated *Other category includes visits that were not codable, patient not seen by doctor or transferred to another facility, HMO will not authorize treatment, and no diagnoses. Figure 1. Antibiotic classes prescribed in absence of a documented indication Objective To estimate the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing in the absence of a documented indication in a nationally representative sample of US ambulatory care visits in 2009. Data Source Public-use data compiled from NAMCS and NHAMCS for 2009 Antibiotic prescriptions identified using up to 8 medications reported Grouped with Lexicon Plus® therapeutic classes (Cerner Multum, Inc) Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Visits with an antibiotic prescription included Ophthalmic diseases and conditions excluded Statistical Analysis ICD-9 codes categorized into diagnoses for which antibiotics are indicated and not indicated Diagnoses from visits with antibiotic prescriptions aggregated and evaluated for antibiotic indication Visits without documented indication described by class of antibiotic class prescribed & primary diagnosis Analysis performed using SAS v. 9.2 Analyses accounted for complex survey design Sample weights including patient visit weights, strata, & primary sampling units applied to produce nationally representative estimates Methods *Misc. antibiotic category includes drugs categorized as miscellaneous antibiotics in the Lexicon Plus® database as well as by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole erythromycin-neomycin, erythromycin-sulfisoxazole, ciprofloxicin-dexamethasone. Conclusions Antibiotic prescribing without documentation of an indication may be common in ambulatory settings Patients over 64 & those without private insurance were most likely to be prescribed an antibiotic without a documented indication Our findings may be biased due to missing data or misclassification in survey response data To support prudent antibiotic prescribing, the indication for the antibiotic should be documented Further research is needed to determine if certain patients are at greater risk for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing *p≤0.01 For copy of this poster, visit us online: Or contact Jessina C. McGregor, mcgregoj@ohsu.edu