Beth Fultz Kansas Department of Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing Your Site for the 2014 SBAC Field Test January 16 – 17, 2014.
Advertisements

4th and 7 th Grade Social Studies 5 th and 8 th Grade Science April 14 – May 2, 2014.
Connecticut Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Smarter Balanced Spring 2014 Field Test Workshop for Students Greenwich Public Schools March,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 22, 2012 Jose Ortega Rodney Okamoto SMARTER Balanced.
041 DnA Implementation Update1 DnA Implementation Update Prepared by the Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department October 4, 2011.
Tablet Computers and Standards of Learning Testing: Insights from the Virginia Department of Education Monday, August 12, 2013.
Computer-Based Testing FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Computer-Based Testing FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Florida Association of MIS June 12, 2012 Susie Lee, Director of Test.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Technology.
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2010 – 2011 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
Race to the Top Technology and Innovation in Assessments Boston, MA Tony Alpert Oregon Department of Education.
Next Generation Assessments (NGAs) Tech Skills Needed For Students to be Successful INFOhio User Meeting September 18, 2014
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2008 – 2009 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
Infrastructure Trial Training September 15, Infrastructure Trial.
© 2014 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Launch Plans for ACCESS for ELLs 2.0: Preparing.
SBAC: UPDATE, RESOURCES, BEST PRACTICES OCTOBER 6, 2014.
Transition Year Teaching Programme 2012 Post-production.
Transition Year Teaching Programme 2012 Post-production.
From State-Wide to State Consortium Assessment Systems: Test Administration Lessons Learned From a Consortium Pilot National Conference on Student Assessment.
Technology Directors/Curriculum Directors Meeting October 2010 Jen Paul – ELL Educational Research Consultant Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
PARCC Update June 6, PARCC Update Today’s Presentation:  PARCC Field Test  Lessons Learned from the Field Test  PARCC Resources 2.
MAP™ Administration Proctor Training Supplementary Component.
Technology Integration Planning Guidelines for Development A Visual Guide/ Couva West Secondary School.
SuccessFactors: Phase 2 Annual Review Process Presented by: Patricia Kelly / VeLonda Dantzler Human Resources Management.
Artificial Intelligence Scoring of Student Essays: West Virginia’s Experience Vaughn G. Rhudy, Ed.D., NBCT Office of Assessment West Virginia Department.
Kansas State Board of Education Brad Neuenswander & Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education March, 2013.
HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2003 – 2004 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Computer Based Testing Tryout in Science CCSSO.
Kansas State Department of Education June 23, 2014.
SBAC Field Test in RUSD After-Action Review Brian Huff May 30, 2014.
Study of Device Comparability within the PARCC Field Test.
.. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
STAAR Assessment Management System and StAAR Online Testing Platform
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Fairfield Public Schools Elementary Presentation.
TestNav: Pearson’s Online Testing Engine Training and Practice Item Review Colorado Summative Science and Social Studies Field Test Spring 2013 Call in:
SBCUSD and Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Testing Assessment and Accountability, January 2013.
Smarter Balance Pilot Test Training April 9, 2013.
Computerizing a Test Using a Learning Management System
Best Practices in Quality Test Administration
Infrastructure Readiness Training January, 2017
BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support
Mastery Connect By Briana Clark.
DISTANCE LEARNING AND THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED LEARNER
Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features
Technology Coordinators
2018 Test Administrator training
Usability Research: Lessons Learned For Digital Assessment Delivery Cathy Wendler Educational Testing Service June 21, 2013.
Infrastructure Readiness Training for FY2018 December 12, 2017
Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
Screener Administration
Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) Regional DTC Meetings
End User Guide.
Online Testing - System Readiness Tools
Technology Coordinators
PARCC Online Testing Technology Update
Student Readiness Resources for PARCC
Smarter Balanced Assessments
South Carolina Alternate Assessment
PGMS Math Update Principal: Sean Roach.
Information for Parents
Technology Coordinators
Test Administrator training — Part A
Technology Coordinators
Iowa Statewide Assessment of Student Progress
Saturday school April 22, 2017.
Technology Coordinators
Instructor Provided Questions
Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:
Listen Up: Creating Effective Audio Lectures for Students
Presentation Template for Building Training David Rand, Director DERA
Presentation transcript:

Beth Fultz Kansas Department of Education Test Delivery Beth Fultz Kansas Department of Education National Conference on Student Assessment Saturday, June 22, 2013

Technology Readiness

Data My school was prepared with the technology required to administer the SBAC computer- based Pilot test: Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree 26.4% 48.8% 6.8% 13.6% 4.3%

Lack of understanding around length of test - Volume Control Common Issues Lack of understanding around length of test - Volume Control Headphones Ability to move to the next question Programming issues Skipped questions Split screens

Computer Delivery States Assumption - SBAC computer test technology would work just like the state assessment Required closer coordination with district IT staff Multiple test takers using the same computer on the same day (access point/reboot)

Band-width and wireless connectivity Age of school computers Paper-Pencil States Band-width and wireless connectivity Age of school computers Unexpected “internal system updates” Students not as familiar with online matching, drag-and-drop and calculator tools Lack of experience in dealing with small problems Student getting logged out Browser getting stuck

Browser/Delivery Systems

Neither Easy or Difficult Data How easy or difficult did you find the SBAC delivery system to use: Very Easy Easy Neither Easy or Difficult Difficult Very Difficult 8.7% 39.8% 28.9% 18.8% 3.7%

Data SBAC Kansas Windows 81.29% 74.89% iPad 1.89% 10.15% Mac 14.74% 14.92% Other 2.08% .04%

Drag & drop didn’t always work Common Issues Audio Film clips - often audio would not play Re-listen to entire section – not a selected section Drag & drop didn’t always work Issue – test would not allow the student to go on to next question

Difficulty seeing the entire question/scrolling iPad and Tablets Keyboards Difficulty seeing the entire question/scrolling Software would only work if all other programs were closed Overall, very successful pilot Fewer technology issues

Technical Difficulties

Data Did you, or any of the test takers, experience any technical difficulties during the administration of the test: Yes 78.6% No 21.4%

What technical difficulties did you, or any of the test takers, experience? Reasons/Responses Problems with school computer equipment 36.0% Issues with the testing platform/ the test itself 51.5% Lack of resources to conduct testing 10.1% Overall the system was difficult to use 14.2% Training materials were inadequate 15.0% Insufficient time allowed for introducing students to the test environment 21.3% Other 22.1%

Conclusions

Comment from a Kansas Testing Coordinator: “Most problems are of the sort that will be resolved before the final test is operational. In other words, the pilot is serving its purpose.”