Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Implementation Guide for Teacher Evaluation
Advertisements

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
Defining and Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Evaluation May 10, 2015.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
SMART Goals.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Tuesday, July 30
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION New Regulation adopted on June 28, 2011.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS FACILITATORS SESSION #2 JANUARY 2013 Unpacking Well-Structured Lessons.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 3 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 1: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, Oct 7 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Blackstone Innovation School Supervision and Evaluation SY September 10, 2013 Café nook 3:30-5:00.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
What it means for New Teachers
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Promoting Learning and Understanding for Students in Mathematics
School Self-Evaluation 
Connecting the Model Curriculum Project to Educator Evaluation
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Formative Assessments and Observations on EDFS
Presented by Field Services
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Aspiring Principals Program
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Unpacking Effective Instruction
Implementing Race to the Top
The EQuIP Rubric (Formerly the Tri-State Rubric) A Tool To Align Lesson Plans and Units to the Common Core State Standards Illinois State Board of Education.
The Practicum Experience – The CAP Process
Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Performance Evaluation: Goal-Writing Summer Institute 2012.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Let's make a portfolio! Teaching Portfolio Clinton Middle School
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Colorado Department of Education
Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012

Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will: Draft your self-assessment summary Draft or revise student learning and professional practice goals and action plans. Understand how to enter the self-assessment and goals into the EDFS Understand how to access more resources At this point: ask for a show of hands to identify those at the same stage so they may sit near each other Brand new to the process Have written some goals ideas Have a draft to revise or receive feedback

Resources, Support, Questions, and Feedback For more information, visit: EDFS: http://eval.mybps.org/ http://educatoreffectiveness.weebly.com Email questions, comments and feedback to: bpsevaluation@boston.k12.ma.us MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Evaluation Site: http://www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/

Educator Feedback and Development System http://eval.mybps.org/ User ID & Password – Same as MyBPS & The Hub

For more information, visit: http://educatoreffectiveness.weebly.com For more information, visit: EDFS: http://eval.mybps.org/ http://educatoreffectiveness.weebly.com Email questions, comments and feedback to: bpsevaluation@boston.k12.ma.us MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Evaluation Site: http://www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/

Brief Overview of Key Changes Today’s Agenda Brief Overview of Key Changes Rubric of Effective Teaching 5 -Step Cycle EDFS Online System Ratings & Plans Self-Assessment Goal Writing Using EDFS Overview of session 6

Rubric for Effective Teaching with 4 Standards Key Change #1: Rubric for Effective Teaching with 4 Standards Former Teacher Evaluation (8 Dimensions) Equity and High Expectations Professionalism Safe, Respectful, Culturally Sensitive and Responsive Learning Communities Partnership with Family and Community Instructional Planning and Implementation: Content Knowledge Monitoring and Assessment of Progress Reflection, Collaboration, and Personal Growth New Principal/Admin Evaluation (4 Standards) *Instructional Leadership Management and Operations Family & Community Partnerships Professional Culture New Teacher Evaluation (4 Standards) *Curriculum, Planning & Assessment *Teaching All Students Family & Community Engagement Professional Culture *Denotes priority standard(s) on which to focus. Educators must be rated proficient on these standards in order to earn an overall performance rating of proficient.

Key Change #2: 5-Step Cycle, Continuous Learning Self-Assessment Analysis, goal-setting & plan development Implementation of the plan Formative Assessment/Evaluation Summative Evaluation 5-Step cycle for all educators in licensed positions 8

Key Change #3: Employee Development & Feedback System (EDFS)

Proficient Fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard Key Change #4: 4 Rating Categories, 4 Educator Growth Plans Grew/Mozart Former categories Does not meet standards Does meet standards Proficient New categories Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary Fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard Enables us to see variation Enables us to see excellence: Depends on the way you use these categories Note: Needs improvement is still within “meets standard”

Educator plans are determined by performance rating and career stage Ratings Educator Plans PTS educators Non-PTS educators Exemplary Self-Directed Growth Plan 1 or 2 years Developing Educator Plan 1 year Proficient Needs Improvement Directed-Growth Plan Up to 1 year Unsatisfactory Improvement Plan 30 days – 1 year

Teachers with Overall “Meets Standard” Transition year: educator plan is determined by previous performance rating and career stage Existing Rating Educator Plans PTS educators Non-PTS educators Teachers with Overall “Meets Standard” Self-Directed Growth Plan 1 or 2 years Developing Educator Plan 1 year Teachers with 1 Overall “Does Not Meet Standard” Directed-Growth Plan Up to 1 year Teachers with 2+ Overall “Does Not Meets” Improvement Plan 30 days to 1 year

Goals and Ratings Progress on Ratings on Overall (2) Goals (4) Standards Rating Curriculum, Planning and Assessment Teaching All Students Family & Community Engagement Professional Culture Student Learning Professional Practice Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory

Brief Overview & Key Changes Today’s Agenda Brief Overview & Key Changes Rubric of Effective Teaching 5 -Step Cycle EDFS Online System Ratings & Plans Self-Assessment Goal Writing Using EDFS 14

Understanding Self-Assessment What are my strengths and areas for development? Self-Assessment Analysis, goal-setting & plan development Implementation of the plan Formative Assessment/Evaluation Summative Evaluation Self assessment consists of analysis of professional practice against the rubrics and analysis of student performance as well as teacher impact

Understanding Self-Assessment Consider: School Priorities District Rigor through Common Core Shifts Standard I Using Data & Differentiation Standard II Family & Community Engagement Standard III Educator Effectiveness Standard IV Student learning strengths & needs Professional practice in relation to the standards outlined in the rubric Self assessment consists of analysis of professional practice against the rubrics and analysis of student performance as well as teacher impact

Teacher Rubric At-A-Glance Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment Standard II: Teaching All Students Standard III: Family and Community Engagement Standard IV: Professional Culture A. Curriculum and Planning Indicator Subject Matter Knowledge Child and Adolescent Development Rigorous Standards-Based Unit Design Well-Structured Lessons A. Instruction Indicator Quality of Effort and Work Student Engagement Meeting Diverse Needs A. Engagement Indicator Parent/Family Engagement A. Reflection Indicator Reflective Practice Goal Setting B. Professional Growth Indicator Professional Learning and Growth B. Assessment Indicator Variety of Assessment Methods Adjustments to Practice Safe Learning Environment Collaborative Learning Environment Student Motivation Learning Expectations Curriculum Support C. Collaboration Indicator Professional Collaboration C. Analysis Indicator Analysis and Conclusions Sharing Conclusions With Colleagues Sharing Conclusions With Students Respects Differences Maintains Respectful Environment Two-Way Communication Culturally Proficient Communication D. Decision-making Indicator Decision-making E. Shared Responsibility Indicator Shared Responsibility D. Expectations Indicator Clear Expectations High Expectations Access to Knowledge F. Professional Responsibility Indicator Judgment Reliability and Responsibility There are 4 standards and 37 indicators Can see better on the rubric handout

Self-Assessment in EDFS Educator submits a summary of strengths and areas of need Educator will not submit a full rubric used for self- assessment; this aspect of self-assessment is private

Brief Overview & Key Changes Today’s Agenda Brief Overview & Key Changes Rubric of Effective Teaching 5 -Step Cycle EDFS Online System Ratings & Plans Self-Assessment Goal Writing Using EDFS Overview of session 19

Understanding Goal Setting Where do I need to grow this year? Where do I want my students to grow this year? Self-Assessment Analysis, goal-setting & plan development Implementation of the plan Formative Assessment/Evaluation Summative Evaluation

Proposing and Setting Goals Each educator is responsible for at least: One goal for student learning, growth and achievement Using baseline student data One goal for professional practice Written to support the achievement of the student learning goal Linked to an element of the rubric Consider team, grade, or department goals Educator proposes by October 1st, supervisor approves Educators will be pursuing at least one goal related to their professional practice as well as at least one directly related to student learning. Educators and their evaluators consider team goals. We think team goals – in the hands of proficient and exemplary teachers and administrators especially – will help support and sustain the professional learning communities that research increasingly tells us are critical to continuous improvement at both the individual and school level. Ultimately, under the regulations, the evaluator makes the call as to the goals the educator pursues

Specific Measurable Attainable Results-Focused Time-bound Attributes of a Strong Goal Make sure the goal is written clearly enough so that both you and your evaluator can determine your degree of success in meeting the goal! Specific Measurable Attainable Results-Focused Time-bound SMA in goal statement, RT in action plan What does it really look like for a goal to be strategic? To be actionable?

Goal Proposal in EDFS Propose one student learning and one professional practice goal Evaluator will accept or return goals for revision Templates are included in the EDFS to support goal-writing

Self-Assessment Activity Self-Assessment is an opportunity for personal reflection on student learning and practice. Directions: Complete the Self-Assessment worksheet -Review district priorities -Consider school priorities -Consider student learning needs Reminder: sit next to someone at the same stage in the process New to this Some fleshed out ideas and topics A written draft looking for feedback for revision

Writing Goals Activity Directions: Use the Goal Writing worksheet to begin writing student learning and professional practice goals. To aid your thinking, use the page of sample goals which are linked to a district priority and an element of the rubric. Complete the Action Plan Development worksheet to identify specific steps to reach.

Goals and Ratings Progress on Ratings on Overall (2) Goals (4) Standards Rating Curriculum, Planning and Assessment Teaching All Students Family & Community Engagement Professional Culture Student Learning Professional Practice Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory

EDFS: Student Learning Goal Proposal 27

EDFS: Action Steps and Plan Development Each goal must have action steps to support educators’ completion of the goal The action steps develop the plan into actionable steps including Actions; Supports or resources required; Timeline and frequency. These steps will also be entered into the EDFS 28

Brief Overview & Key Changes Today’s Agenda Brief Overview & Key Changes Rubric of Effective Teaching 5 -Step Cycle EDFS Online System Ratings & Plans Self-Assessment Goal Writing Using EDFS Overview of session 29

Employee Feedback and Development System Log on to: http://eval.mybps.org/

Resources, Support, Questions, and Feedback For more information, visit: EDFS: http://eval.mybps.org/ http://educatoreffectiveness.weebly.com Email questions, comments and feedback to: bpsevaluation@boston.k12.ma.us MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Evaluation Site: http://www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/

Office of Educator Effectiveness Ross Wilson, Assistant Superintendent for Educator Effectiveness Jared Joiner, Implementation Specialist Emily Kalejs Qazilbash, Implementation Specialist Angela Rubenstein, Implementation Specialist Kris Taylor, Implementation Specialist Jenna Costin, EDFS On-line System Coordinator

Have we met our goals for today? If we have done our job today, you: Have started a draft of your self- assessment summary Have started to write or revise student learning and professional practice goals Understand how to enter the self- assessment and goals into the EDFS Intended outcomes for today Continued support throughout the year