8Y 11-30-2015 Monday Objective: Evaluate the Civil War and its leaders based on the just war doctrine. Agenda: Do Now: What is a just war according to the Catholic Church? Why do you think there are so many standards that must be met before the Church considers something a just war? How do you feel about this doctrine? Finish taking notes on just war. Discussion and evaluation. Homework: Evaluate the Civil War and its leaders based on the just war doctrine. (Google Classroom: “Was the Civil War a Just War?”) Due Wednesday.

Just War Doctrine of the Catholic Church Must be decided by the people in charge. The damage being inflicted by the aggressor is grave, lasting, and certain. All other options have been explored. War as defensive measure must have serious prospect of success. It cannot produce more or greater evil. There is a duty to protect and help innocent victims. Helpers must never try to influence who they are helping. There is a moral obligation to intervene when basic human rights are being seriously violated. Economic sanctions must be used carefully and not to punish. It cannot just affect everyone (indiscriminate). The purpose has to be clear and obtainable.

Must be decided by the people in charge. 2. The damage being inflicted by the aggressor is grave, lasting, and certain.

All other options have been explored. 4. War as defensive measure must have serious prospect of success.

5. It cannot produce more or greater evil. 6 5. It cannot produce more or greater evil. 6. There is a duty to protect and help innocent victims. Helpers must never try to influence who they are helping.

7. There is a moral obligation to intervene when basic human rights are being seriously violated. 8. Economic sanctions must be used carefully and not to punish. It cannot just affect everyone (indiscriminate). The purpose has to be clear and obtainable.

Short Debate: Was the Civil War a Just War? Yes or No Round 1: Opening Statement Yes it was because…… No it was not because ……. Round 2: Rebuttal Point out the flaws in the other team’s position. Round 3: Defense and summary Defend your position and summarize your most important points. Convince the judges Points: Good, convincing arguments Clarity Respectfulness and teamwork Judges: Keep track of points and write a rationale of why one team won over the other.

Groups Yes Group 1: Mitchell, Andrew No Group 1: Colette, Noah, Matt Judges Group 1: Nick, Anghom Yes Group 2: Charlie, Isaac No Group 2: Jordan, Patrick Judges Group 2: Jack, Reid Yes Group 3: Niamh, Nicole No Group 3: Gabe, Bobby Judges Group 3: Samuel, Annie

Judges’ Points Sheet Category Affirmative (yes ) Points Negative (no) Points Respectfulness and teamwork 5 points total Points and notes Clarity Good, convincing arguments No Maximum points Write down each convincing argument here and give them 1-2 points each depending on how convincing the argument is.