IU: Discriminating between more than 2 information units on a VMS ( condition E) generates increased mental workload resulting in more/longer gazes. Variable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY REAR ENDERS – HOW CAN WE PREVENT THEM? A collision occurs when two vehicles occupy the same space!
Advertisements

Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY What needs quick thinking and concentration? Intersection, junctions, roundabouts & U turns all require your.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.
Lec 3: Ch 3, Part I User and Vehicle Characteristics Objectives Know five critical components of the traffic system Know there is considerable variability.
Partial Lesson first 20 out 65 slides 4 Lane Strategies and Rules of the Road.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 9 New Technologies Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
HIGHWAY DRIVING Chapter 6.
Driving Simulator Performance Variables: An Overview Ronald R. Mourant – Northeastern University –
Age-Differences in the Visual Information Processing Demands of Vehicle Instrument Panel Interfaces Heimstra Laboratories University of South Dakota Frank.
Instructions for using this template. Remember this is Jeopardy, so where I have written “Answer” this is the prompt the students will see, and where.
Trucks on Motorways in the Netherlands A survey of the role of trucks in traffic flow AVV Transport Research Centre Ministry of Transport Onno Tool
The Logic for the Distracted Driver David Strayer.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Speed Limits, Speed Control and Stopping Regulations.
The effect of in-vehicle warning systems on speed compliance in work zones 報告者:楊子群 James Whitmire II a, ⇑, Justin F. Morgan, Tal Oron-Gilad c, P.A. Hancock.
1 Challenge the future Longitudinal Driving Behavior in case of Emergency situations: An Empirically Underpinned Theoretical Framework Dr. R.(Raymond)
T TNO Human Factors Driving behaviour effects of the Chauffeur Assistant Jeroen Hogema.
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
Understanding Work Zones
Cart Training California Lutheran University Safety and Security.
Introduction Study area Existing problem Objective Methodology Results and Conclusions Recommendations.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
EasyWay - conclusion.
TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY
Evaluating Sight Distances
Life Goes By Way Too Fast to Not
Distracted Driving Amanda wende.
St. Francis Prep Driver Education
Jeopardy The Basics Vehicle Control Traffic Laws
Defensive Driving What are the attributes of a good driver?
HISTORY FLATBED ACQUISITION
Unit 2 Basic Vehicle Control
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Effects of Oncoming Vehicle Size on Overtaking Judgments
Modeling of Traffic Patterns on Highways
Adaptable safety and security in v2x systems
Name Unit Safety Officer
Sight Distances.
N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere
The Safety Technologies to Consider While Buying a New Car.
Design Consistency and Positive Guidance
Chapter 9 New Technologies
Overview of CV2X Requirements
Texting While Driving -- Another Kind of Impairment
lesson 10.1 SEARCHING INTERSECTIONS
TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY
ALABAMA COURSE OF STUDY #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 AND #7
IPDE: Decide and Execute
How to Avoid Accidents While Driving
on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system
Vehicle Characteristics and Car Following
Life Goes By Way Too Fast to Not
Dilemma Zone Protection at An Isolated Signalized Intersection Using Dynamic Speed Guidance Wenqing Chen.
ABS, Crash Speed and Injury Severity
MOT Training for Incident Responders in Florida
Safety Distance to the front
Using Naturalistic Driving Data to Assess the Prevalence of Environmental Factors and Driver Behaviors in Teen Driver Crashes March 2015.
Alabama Driver Manual Chapter 3
lesson 16.3 STRATEGIES FOR DRIVING ON HIGHWAYS
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
lesson 8.3 DISTRACTIONS OUTSIDE THE VEHICLE
Manual Traffic Control
Rural Driving.
Jeopardy The Basics Vehicle Control Traffic Laws
Graduate Research Assistant
Presentation transcript:

IU: Discriminating between more than 2 information units on a VMS ( condition E) generates increased mental workload resulting in more/longer gazes. Variable Message Sign strategies for congestion warning on motorways – A driving simulator study Nora Reinolsmann, Wael Alhajyaseen, Kris Brijs, Tom Brijs, Joris Cornu, Kristof Mollu Introduction Driving scenarios Designs & distances are derived from available guidelines (e.g. European EasyWay II, Federal Highway Administration) & empirical studies VMS formats were selected in consultation with Dynamic Traffic Management Unit of the Flemish Traffic Centre) Severe rear-end crashes due to unexpected hard congestion tails on motorways Hard congestion tail (i.e., drivers brake hard due to unexpected congestion tail Soft congestion tail (i.e., traffic slows down gradually due to emerging congestion) Advance warning of hard congestion tails to enable driver’s to gradually lower speed and avoid erratic maneuvers/ accidents. Figure 6 : Mean deceleration in condition B (1km) Drivers start to slow down at 460m before the congestion tail with max. deceleration -2.3m/s2 Table 1: Test conditions in the driving simulator Objective: How to convey an advance congestion warning in the most effective way using Variable Message Signs? Variable Message Signs Figure 7 : Mean deceleration in condition C (2km) Drivers slow down at 300m before the congestion tail with max. deceleration -2.8m/s2 VMS types: gantry (overhead sign) vs. cantilever (rode side pole) Distance VMS location to congestion tail: Tactical distances: 1km vs. 2km (standard) vs. 4km Strategic distances: 5-10km 3. Message design: Layout (pictogram with or without text) Number of information units (2 to 4 units) Distance indication to congestion tail Discussion Results VMS type: Gantry panels best visible for drivers on all lanes Information units: More than 2 IU on a VMS (condition E) generates increased mental workload  more/longer eye glances The distance to the congestion tail itself is more important than VMS distance indication VMS distance of 4km & more is contra-productive Accidents One collision avoidance maneuver (condition D) 6 drivers had a rear-end accident (all conditions, except for B & C) Mean speed Conclusion A gantry-mounted congestion warning displaying a pictogram with the word ‘congestion’ at 1km before the congestion tail.  Lowest speed, smooth deceleration & safe stopping distances The effectiveness of a congestion warning on VMS is dependent upon: message visibility from all lanes message-incident contingency  link with the critical event warned for Figure 3 : Mean speed Figure 1 : example of a gantry (left) & cantilever (right) Lowest initial mean speeds of drivers approaching the congestion tail were found in condition B Methodology Mean deceleration Driving simulator Medium-fidelity fixed-base simulator (STISIM M400) 180° screen with a resolution of 1,024 × 768 pixels at a 60 Hz refresh rate. Eye tracker: FaceLAB 5.0 for eye movements Recommendations Gantry sign is preferred over cantilevers to display a congestion warning Tactical congestion warning at a standard distance of 1km instead of 2km Use a pictogram with text unit “congestion” Figure 4 : Mean deceleration Condition B: safer stopping distances due to a more gradual and smooth deceleration among drivers Gaze parameters Limitations & future research Follow-up studies with larger sample sizes & more test scenarios Types of distraction leading to longer reaction and response times On-road studies for absolute validity Figure 2 : Driving simulator at Transportation Research Institute (IMOB Belgium) Participants Acknowledgement 43 Belgian drivers (~ 43 age) with a valid driving license Driving experience: 10.000 -14.999km /year Figure 5 : Number and duration of eye gazes towards VMS This study was made possible by the NPRP award [NPRP 9-360- 2-150] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author[s]. Gantry-mounted VMS (B-E): slightly higher number of eye fixations with a shorter gaze duration