User instrument policy

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Licences for Europe Introductory meeting, 4 February WG 3 - Audiovisual sector and cultural heritage institutions.

Advertisements

MOSS 2007 Document Management Adam McCarthy 1 st April 2009.

Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.

Magellan Associate Director Report Personnel Observing Statistics Commissioning of Instruments.

ESO Documentation and Considerations for Major Emergencies

Science, Innovations and Institutions: Comments Paula Stephan, Georgia State University June 2005.

1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.

1 Roger Erickson 1 Coordination with Accelerator Systems NEH Accelerator Readiness Review Coordination with Accelerator Systems.

Cooperative Research IRB Brownbag, 3/4/08. ISU Policy Cooperative research projects are those projects which involve more than one institution. The official.

Carbon Management Steering Board 7 th October 2011 ETHOS (waste to heat) & ComPod – Update CARBON MANAGEMENT BOARD – October 2011.

HARPS-NEF PDR December 6 & 7, HARPS-NEF Program Project Manager Tim Norton.

Systems, Design and Manufacturing Kernel Company Profile Rev 5.1 Dec, 2014.

Magellan f/5 Planning and Status Andrew Szentgyorgyi Magellan SAC Meeting Pasadena/17 Mar 2012.

Technical manager’s report September Telescope activities Primary mirror hardpoint repair New mirror actuator controls Collimation analysis F/5.

Conferences - Hosting/co-hosting science conferences - Exhibit and present project output and services at community conferences Training Workshops - Data.

Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.

Magellan Associate Director Report Personnel Observing Statistics Commissioning of Instruments Committees.

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.

EPOS Preparatory phase Torild van Eck (ORFEUS) Call INFRA Deadline: December 3, 2009 Funding: between 3 and 6 MEuro Duration: max 4 year.

The Tiksi Hydrometeorological Observatory Program International Collaboration for Climate Studies U.S. Science Contact:

1 MICE CM28 PM Report Progress since CM27 Schedule, dates, milestones Electrical substation Visiting RAL Andy Nichols, STFC 4 th October 2010.

LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.

OPTICON is funded by the European Commission under Contract no RII3-CT Site Characterization of the Canarian Observatories: Different activities.

Rackspace Analyst Event Tim Bell

Report from Subaru Advisory Committee The main issues of the current SAC: ・ Extensive (strategic) program of Subaru telescope ・ International collaborations.

MWA Operations Management Plan (OMP, v. 3) Ron Remillard (MIT); MWA Project Meeting, June 6, 2011.

25 August UCA International Users Group Testing Quality Assurance Program Funding Issues 25 August 2010/ Updated 12 October 2010 Jack Robinson,

Our Mission The OPTICON Integrated Infrastructure Initiative brings together many of Europe's astronomical observatories, data centres and laboratories.

LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.

Australia’s Path to a Giant Telescope Matthew Colless MNRF Symposium 7 June 2003.

Solar-B SOT/FPP 1 SOT April 2006Ted Tarbell SOT Collaboration & Data Policy Ted Tarbell, for the Science Working Group 18-Apr-2006.

1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.

Agreement Reaching Process Documentation (Example) Professional Virtual Community Business Opportunity.

Magellan Associate Director Report Personnel Observing Statistics Commissioning of Instruments Existing instruments Future Instruments.

BNL Tier 1 Service Planning & Monitoring Bruce G. Gibbard GDB 5-6 August 2006.

May 17, 2004SSWG - PFIS Shared Risk1 PFIS Commissioning, Shared Risk, and Transition to Operations.

SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Science Operations: the Array Science Center Claire Chandler NRAO/Socorro.

Ruth Pordes November 2004TeraGrid GIG Site Review1 TeraGrid and Open Science Grid Ruth Pordes, Fermilab representing the Open Science.

S. Ritz 1 GLAST Science Policy Document Outline Action Item GUC Meeting June 2005 R. Brissenden S. Ritz Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

THE WEEKLY DETECTOR Taormina, Italia June, 2005 € 0.00 The Nerds are Back In Town !! This Week’s Forecast Clear Skies Seeing 0.4” Some Ash Warm.

Proposal: staged delivery of Scheduler and OpSim V1 (2016) meet most of the SRD requirements – Deliver a system that can be extended with an improved scheduler.

INNOVATIVE THINKING FOR THE REAL WORLD Technical Services Review 2013 James Crooks Head of Technical Services, UCLan.

Magellan SAC April 7-8, 2006 Pasadena, CA. Personnel New hires: –None Open positions: –Programmer –Scientists (two, through AAO) Changes –Pasadena EE.

Joint REB Review Between WLU and UW Presented by Paul Barnard (WLU) Research Compliance & Policy Officer.

Incoming instruments. New instruments IMACS MOEMultiobject echellette LDSS upgradeMultiobject optical spectroscopy CorMASSLow-res visiting NIR spectrograph.

NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PACS NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 ESA AO and NASA Funding Call Phil Appleton and.

Some Introductory Comments H.A. McAlister March 16, 2009 CHARA Collaboration Year Five Science Review Nice, France.

The Role of an Access Programme: Lessons for FP7 Birgitta Nordström Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University Denmark.

SALT Board Meeting #19: May 2006 Board Meeting #19: 8-9 May Astronomy Operations Now 3 SOs: Fred, Sandisa, Lucian (Francois resigned), with Charl.

Operations Good –Telescope downtime is low –Important repairs accomplished –Observer satisfaction is high Bad –Maintenance is deferred –Unfinished work.

CHARA Collaboration Year-Five Science Review 2008 Nightly Reports and Remote Observations By ~ PJ Sallave - Goldfinger.

Testing Process: Tools, Responsibilities, Connectathon Steve Moore Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology.

ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.

Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 11st ELiTES meeting.

Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Alternative Dome Enclosure concept Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer

7.00 Understand marketing and business management.

Commissioning – Remote monitoring

Operations Concept Simon Radford and Operations Committee

Core Management Evaluation

7.00 Understand marketing and business management.

7.00 Understand marketing and business management

Letizia Stanghellini NOAO 16 June 2008 – Science with Giant Telescopes

7.00 Understand marketing and business management.

EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting

Extragalactic Discussion – early science

ESS Project Status Roland Garoby – Technical Director August 2018.

ETS WG role and working methods

Project Status Review May 13-15, 2008.

Maria Teresa Capria December 15, 2009 Paris – VOPlaneto 2009

Presentation transcript:

User instrument policy Definition: Not a facility instrument. Visitor instruments behave as user instruments. User instruments do not count towards instrument contributions.

Permissions Magellan technical manager, in consultation with observatory staff. Letter from PI institution to Magellan technical manager.

Planning documents Joint supplemental report to SAC Commissioning plan Support agreement

Engineering time On-telescope nighttime engineering is supplied by the PI.

Costs PI is responsible for costs of installing and commissioning.

Availability Instrument is available only to the PI. PI must be on-site during setup and observing. Private collaborations with PI are OK

Scheduling A user instrument will not be scheduled for science until the observatory staff and PI agree that it is ready.

Comments User and facility instruments have similar workload demands for installation and commissioning. An instrument scientist is not required. Instead, the PI must be present at all observing runs.