Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc: IEEE /705ar0 Submission Javier del Prado et. al November 2002 Slide 1 Mandatory TSPEC Parameters and Reference Design of a Simple Scheduler.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /492r0 Submission Lim Wei Lih, Matsushita Electric Ind. Slide 1 July 2001 Comments on AV transmission Recommended Practice Yasuo HARADA,
Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company
Doc.:IEEE /0365r1 March 2012 Z. Quan, Qualcomm Inc MAC Header Compression Slide 1 Authors:
MAC Header Compression
Discussion on MAC Calibration Power Saving Test
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
doc.: IEEE /560r1 Submission John Kowalski, Sharp November 2001 Adding Rate Parameter to the TSPEC /Queue State Element John Kowalski Sharp.
Doc.: IEEE /1032r1 Submission September 2004 Hiroyuki Nakase, Tohoku Univ.Slide 1 Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput. Tohoku University.
Doc.: IEEE /601r0 Submission Harada Yasuo, Matsushita Electric Ind. Slide 1 November20 01 Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement.
Doc.: IEEE /149r0 Submission March, 2002 Jun Hirano, Matsushita CommunicationSlide 1 Global Area Network (GAN) Concept Jun Hirano*, Tan Pek Yew**,
Doc.: IEEE /1230r1 Submission ah Channel Access Improvement Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1191r0 Submission September 2014 MAC calibration results Date: Authors: Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1032r1 Submission September 2004 Hiroyuki Nakase, Tohoku Univ.Slide 1 Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput. Tohoku University.
Doc.: IEEE /1181r0 Submission October 2004 He et alSlide 1 Proposal for Fast Inter-BBS Transitions Xiaoning He Paragon Wireless, Inc. Sunnyvale,
Doc.: IEEE /392 Submission November 2000 K. Halford, S. Halford and M. Webster, IntersilSlide 1 OFDM System Performance Karen Halford, Steve Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /248r0 Submission Bobby JoseSlide 1 February 2002 Contention Free TXOP Request and Allocation Issues Bobby Jose,
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
Discussion on MAC Calibration Power Saving Test
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Wireless Networking Business Unit
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
Proposal for Fast Inter-BBS Transitions
MAC Calibration results
WNG Committee Report Vancouver, BC July 2002 July 2002
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
Network side issues in WLAN Interworking
MAC Calibration Results
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison
Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput.
MAC Calibration Results
MAC Calibration Results
WLAN Interworking scenarios
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues on Superframe Size for Uncompressed.
OFDM System Performance
PCF vs. DCF: Limitations and Trends
Fragmentation with A-MPDU
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
AP Function Classification & Requirements
Terminology Corrections and Improvements for the TGe Draft
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> March, 2008
Panasonic Partial Proposal Summary for TGn
Power Efficient PS Poll
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
TGe Consensus Proposal
Simulation Results for Controlled Contention Mechanism
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
3GPP WLAN Interworking update
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
3GPP WLAN interworking requirements
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Modified Delayed (Dly) Acknowledgement for.
Proposed Resolution for Draft 3.0
Partial Proposal for TGn
(Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.)
Panasonic Partial Proposal Summary for TGn
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
Analysis on IEEE n MAC Efficiency
Enhancement for AV Transmission
TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size?
Presentation transcript:

Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN July 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/434r1 July 2002 Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN Tan Pek Yew, Jun Hirano & Takashi Aramaki (Panasonic) Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic Wei Lih Lim, Matsushita Electric Ind.

Content Definition of Data Stream in .11 WLAN July 2002 Content Definition of Data Stream in .11 WLAN Burst Ack Transmission in TXOP in .11e Header Information Bit Rates in TXOP Numerical Results Conclusions Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

Traffic Stream - Definition July 2002 Traffic Stream - Definition Based on IEEE802.11e Draft 3.0 A traffic stream is a set of MSDUs to be delivered subject to the QoS parameter values provided to the MAC in a particular traffic specification (TSPEC) Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

Burst Transmission in TXOP (not Fragmented) July 2002 Burst Transmission in TXOP (not Fragmented) TXOP = 3968 uS Burst Data = 10 packets Total Data TX Time = 3868usec CF POLL(44uS) Burst Data(368uS) Burst Data BurstAckReq(24uS) Burst Data Burst Data BurstAck(44uS) CF POLL SIF(16uS) SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF Based on 54 Mbps PHY Full Header with Payload (2312 bytes) = 368 usec Data Packet Header size = 4 usec % for Address Fields = 4*(10)/3868 = 1.03% Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

Burst Transmission in TXOP (Fragmented) July 2002 Burst Transmission in TXOP (Fragmented) TXOP = 3712 uS Burst Data = 5 packets Total Data TX Time = 3612 uS CF POLL(44uS) Burst Data(704uS) Burst Data Burst Data Burst Data BurstAckReq(24uS) BurstAck(44uS) CF POLL SIF(16uS) SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF Fragment to 9 MPDUs Payload(1) (256 bytes) H Payload(9) (264 bytes) H SIF Based on 54 Mbps PHY Full Header with Payload (256-264 bytes) = 64 usec Header size overhead = 4 usec % for Address Fields = 4*(5*9)/3612 = 4.98% Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

Header Address Bit Rates July 2002 Numerical Results Assumptions Same PHY overheads as data rates increases Worst Case Scenarios Encountered – Fragmented Packets PHY (Mpbs) Header Address Bit Rates 54 2.69 Mbps 108 5.38 Mbps 216 10.76 Mbps 432 21.52 Mbps Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

Conclusions To Achieve High Throughput July 2002 Conclusions To Achieve High Throughput Reduction of irrelevant header information Substantial data rates can be saved from header information Proposed that High Throughput and Future version of WNG to look into irrelevant information be removed for data packets from one traffic stream Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic