Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico, VA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paint ToolMarks Tool Marks. Tool Marks A scratch or other microscopic marking left by the action of a tool on an object Evidentiary value: no two tool.
Advertisements

Forensic Paint Analysis
Chapter 3 Physical Evidence Part II Naturally shed hairs, such as a head hair dislodged through combing, display undamaged, club-shaped roots Forcibly.
Paints and Coatings. The Case of the Careening Motorcycle n A motorcyclist is charged with drunk driving (motorcycling?) and with damaging a police car.
Trace Evidence: Paint Criminalistics.
Sifting Through the Layers: The Application of Forensic Databases to Tape and Paint Analyses Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico,
Physical Evidence The examination of physical evidence by a forensic scientist is generally undertaken for the purposes of identification or comparison.
Chapter 3 Physical Evidence.
Miss Stanley Middle School Science Club Forensic Division
Drill How are natural fibers different from synthetic fibers? What is the most common types of natural fibers?
Chapter 3: Physical Evidence. Introduction It would be impossible to list all the objects that could conceivably be of importance to a crime. Almost anything.
11-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein Trace Evidence ll:
Admissibility Package for Tape all Wrapped Up M ark A. Ahonen.
Forensic Chemistry/Trace Evidence
8.4 Notes Examination of Paint.
Wednesday March 4, 2015 SWBAT discuss how glass is used in criminal in order to prepare for paint. Drill: Explain how we use density to solve measuring.
Forensic Databases Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) Fingerprint and criminal history system for 50 million subjects Operational.
Tues 9/24/13 Bellringer: ◦ Take out your notes and respond to the following:  Would sap taken from a tree be class evidence or individual evidence? Why?
Chapter Physical Evidence. OBJECTIVES (don’t write) Review the common types of physical evidence encountered at crime scenes, Explain the difference.
8.3 Notes Fibers. Objectives Understand the differences between natural and manufactured fibers List the properties of fibers that are more useful for.
+ Soil. + Soil Questions (1) What is soil? (2) What are the physical characteristics of soil? (3) What is the chemical composition of soil? (4) How do.
3-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Chapter.
3-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Chapter.
Physical Evidence Chapter 3. Types of Physical Evidence Blood, semen, saliva Document Drugs Explosives Fibers Fingerprints Firearms and ammunitions Glass.
3 - PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ CRIMINALISTICS An Introduction to Forensic Science, 9/E By Richard Saferstein.
Forensic Paint Analysis
Fiber Evidence - A fiber is the smallest unit of a textile material that has a length many times greater than its diameter. -A fiber can be spun with other.
Chemical Make-up of Fiber FT-IR: –Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectro. –Absorption of Infrared light by the polymer that comprise fiber result in characteristic.
Forensic Analysis of Fibers. Types of Fibers Natural – fibers that come from plants or animals Man-made – fibers that come from natural or synthetic polymers.
8 th Grade Forensic Science Presentation developed by T. Trimpe 2006
Physical evidence Trace evidence. Small or microscopic materials that can be transferred upon contact – Hair, fiber, paint, glass, plastic, soil and pollen.
Fibers.
 Examinations can associate a hair to a person on the basis of microscopic characteristics in the hair.  The characteristics in the hair, but cannot.
Paint Trace Evidence K. Culbertson. Paint Physical evidence One of the most prevalent types of evidence to be analyzed Hit-and-run cases – Color, make,
Trace Evidence Paint. Introduction Manufactured products and even most natural materials contain small quantities of elements, or trace elements, in total.
Fiber Examinations. Fibers are all around us Textile/Fiber Evidence Clothing Clothing Home Furnishings Home Furnishings Any Textile Product Any Textile.
Trace Evidence. Summary  Microscopic Analysis  Types of Trace Evidence  Glass  Hair (fur)  Fibers  Paint  Soil  Gunshot Residue.
MARCH 8, 2016 EQ: What are different methods used for fiber identification? WARM-UP: The following slide will have 9 pictures (A-I). Identify the animal/human.
Forensic Examination of Paint
Chapter 3 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.
Trace evidence ii: metals, paint, and soil
Hairs & Fibers Forensic Science
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
Forensic Science Ms. MacCormack Spring 2017
Fiber Analysis.
Fiber Analysis Hair and Fiber 3.
Fibers Criminalistics.
Using Soil to Solve Crimes
Paint Ch11 Trace Evidence.
4 Circumstantial Evidence.
(Discussion – Evidence: Testimonial vs. Physical)
Forensic Soil Analysis
DECEMBER 4, 2012 EQ: How can synthetic fibers be used to solve crimes?
Coating Failure at a Gas Compressor Facility
Forensic Characteristics of Soil
Examination of Paint Examine two paint samples to determine same origin Generally used in burglaries, hit-and-run accidents or vehicle accidents.
Trace Evidence Fibers.
Trace Evidence ll: Metals, Paint, and Soil
Forensic Paint Analysis
Fiber Analysis.
Chapter 11 Trace Evidence II
Chapter 8 Hair, Fibers, And Paint
Physical Evidence.
Fiber Analysis Hair and Fiber 3.
Fiber Analysis Hair and Fiber 3.
Unit 3: Physical Evidence
Presentation transcript:

Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico, VA Sifting Through the Layers: The Application of Forensic Databases to Tape and Paint Analyses Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico, VA

Use of Databases The Paints and Polymers Sub-Unit of the FBI Laboratory has multiple databases and sample collections to use to provide investigative leads to investigators. Duct Tape Collection archived in SLICE Paint Data Query for automotive paints

Duct Tape Case Homicide, in which the victim had been wrapped in trash bags and duct tape Request: Attempt to determine the manufacturer of the tape

Analytical Scheme Visual and Micro- scopic Examinations Physical Characteristics: Backing and Adhesive Color Backing Appearance Backing Layer Structure Width Thickness Scrim Count Fabric Weave Yarn Construction Yarn Composition

Analytical Scheme Visual and Micro- scopic Examinations FTIR XRD SEM/EDS Adhesive Chemistry by μ-FTIR: Organic and some inorganic information Backing Chemistry and Layer Structure by ATR Crystalline Information: Intact Tape Specimen, Occasionally Backing Alone Elemental Profiles of Adhesives and Backings SLICE Searches

Duct Tape Collection 80+ tapes (now expanded to ~400) Acquired by FBI personnel Purchased at common retail stores or obtained from manufacturing plant visits Most marketed as general-purpose or economy-grade Variety of manufacturers

SLICE Background Spectral Library Identification and Classification Explorer (SLICE) Archival program for storing EDS data with data entry capabilities Conventional format modified to allow for inclusion of specific characteristics of tape Collaboration between FBI, FDLE, and MSHP

Duct Tape Case Full protocol completed Relatively unique physical characteristics Multi-layered backing Textured yarns in both the warp and fill directions Relatively common chemical composition

Duct Tape Case Two candidates eliminated based on backing layer structure Final candidate could not be eliminated following comparison of data from any technique

Duct Tape Case 3M Scotch® Home and Shop Also known as 3MTM duct tape 3900 General purpose tape manufactured by 3M in London, Ontario, Canada Unable to determine the distributor of a tape specimen

Automotive Paint Case Hit-and-run Victim was struck and killed by an unknown vehicle while lying on the road Request: Examine the victim’s clothing and vehicle parts left at the scene to provide any possible vehicle information

Automotive Paint Case Three paint systems encountered White non-metallic paint chips found in victim’s clothing Light-colored metallic paint chips found in victim’s clothing Silver metallic painted plastic parts left at the scene

Paint System A Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OU1 and OU2 layers. Four candidates following comparisons of OT2, OU1, and OU2 layers. All were General Motors vehicles from the Flint, Michigan, plant from 1994-1995.

Paint System B Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OT2, OU1, and OU2 layers. Reasonable hits following comparison of all layers included four samples from GEN LRD 2000 and one each from GEN LRD 2002, GEN OSH 2001, GEN OSH 2005, and GEN WEN 2000.

Paint System C Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OT2 layer. Make/model/year searches were unsuccessful.

Automotive Paint Case Since paint from at least two different vehicles was found, the contributor was contacted for more information. The victim’s vehicle had rolled over him prior to the hit-and-run incident. The victim was driving a white 1994 GM van manufactured in Flint, Michigan. Therefore, no subsequent exams conducted on Paint System A. However, this provides an example of a successful PDQ search.

Paint System B Pulled out samples of 8 PDQ hits (5 different plant/year combinations). Microscopic comparisons eliminated 2 plants/years, leaving GEN OSH 2005, GEN LRD 2000, and GEN LRD 2002. Performed FTIR and SEM/EDS analysis on remaining candidates. Mention we have US archived (6) and Denis provided 2.

Paint System B GEN OSH 2005 Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Questioned Sample GEN OSH 2005

Paint System B GEN OSH 2005 Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight peak width difference at 1550 cm-1 of OT2 layers Elemental differences between clearcoats

Database Sample Questioned Sample

Paint System B GEN OSH 2005 Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight peak width difference at 1550 cm-1 of OT2 layers Elemental differences between clearcoats Performed a PDQ search on other samples originating from GEN OSH but all were eliminated.

Paint System B GEN LRD 2000 and GEN LRD 2002 These other two hits are from the same plant but from different model years Relative colors of the primers consistent IR spectra consistent SEM analysis thus performed Other two hits: same plant, two different model years IRs consistent, relative colors of primers consistent Light micrographs of three: Q, MY2000, MY2002 Show EDS of ecoats Back to last two bullets

GEN LRD 2000 GEN LRD 2002 Questioned Sample

Paint System B GEN LRD 2000 A representative from LRD confirmed that MY 2000 was the last year this plant used Pb-based primers. Next formulation change did not occur until MY 2006.

Paint System B GEN LRD 2002 This sample could not be eliminated following all exams. Based on the condition of the colorcoat, an accurate color evaluation could not be conducted. The same LRD contact confirmed that no two-toned vehicles were produced at that plant during that time frame.

Paint System C Using information on colors available at GEN LRD during the MY 2001-2005 time frame, color comparisons were conducted between the questioned sample and repaint pages. Questioned sample consistent with GM silver metallic paint color code of 8867. Color names included Ultra Silver Metallic and Silver Effect.

Automotive Paint Case A partial VIN was constructed from the following information: General Motors vehicle manufactured at the Lordstown, Ohio plant Model year range of 2001-2005 During that time, LRD produced the Chevrolet Cavalier and Pontiac Sunfire.

andria.hobbs@ic.fbi.gov

Questioned Sample UOHL = GEN LRD 2000 UVAC = GEN LRD 2002

Cross-sectioning Technique