ATLAS Silicon Tracker commissioning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.K.Stefanides March 07, The Muon Spectrometer of the ATLAS detector: progress report on construction and physics studies at the University of Athens.
Advertisements

ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
1 ATLAS SCT Endcap C Efficiency Measurement Nicholas Austin IoP Conference April 2009.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
ATLAS P. Morettini - ATLAS Collaboration 3/9/20131Paolo Morettini - ICNFP 2013.
1 The ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker commissioning at SR1 APS and JPS joint conference October 30, 2006 Ryuichi Takashima ( Kyoto Univ. of Education ) For.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai, Kazuhiko Hara (Univ. of.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
First collisions in LHC
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Tracking detectors/2 F.Riggi.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Overview and status of the ATLAS Pixel Detector Attilio Andreazza Università di Milano and I.N.F.N. for the ATLAS Pixel Collaboration Layout of the ATLAS.
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
Optical data transmission for
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
CMS Tracker Alignment with Cosmic Data and Strategy at the Startup
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
The ATLAS Inner Detector Installation and hardware commissioning
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Operational Experience with the ATLAS Pixel Detector at the LHC
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Silicon Tracker commissioning P. Morettini - ATLAS Collaboration ATLAS Silicon Tracker commissioning Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

The ATLAS Detector Muon spectrometer Inner Detector (ID) Muon Detector Tile Calorimeter Liquid Argon calorimeter Muon spectrometer m tracking MDT (Monitored drift tubes) CSC (Cathode Strip Chambers) RPC (Resistive Plate Chamber) Trigger TGC (Thin Gas Chamber) Trigger 4T Toroid Magnet Inner Detector (ID) Tracking Silicon Pixels 50 x 400 mm2 Silicon Strips (SCT) 80 mm stereo Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT) up to 36 points/track 2T Solenoid Magnet Calorimeter system EM and Hadronic energy Liquid Ar (LAr) EM barrel and end-cap LAr Hadronic end-cap Tile calorimeter (Fe – scintillator) hadronic barrel 3 Level Trigger system L1 – hardware – 100 kHz 2.5 ms latency L2 – software – 3-4 kHz 10 ms latency EF – software – 100 Hz 1-2 s latency Toroid Magnet Solenoid Magnet SCT Pixel Detector TRT Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

The ATLAS Inner Detector Designed to precisely reconstruct charged particles 7-points silicon (pixels + strips) tracker (|h|<2.5) plus straw tube quasi- continuous tracker with electron identification capability (TRT) (|h|<2). 2 T solenoidal magnetic field Momentum resolution: IP resolution: Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

The Semiconductor Tracker The SemiConductor Tracker (SCT) is a silicon strip detector. It’s organized in 4 layers barrel, built with 2112 modules and two 9 disks end-caps, made of 1976 modules. The total number of strips is 6.3 106. The barrel module consists of four single sided p-on-n strip detectors: Pitch 80 mm Strip length 120 mm Stereo angle 40 mrad The end-caps are built with three different modules: Pitch 57-95 mm Strip length 55-120 mm Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

The Pixel Detector The Pixel Detector is made of 1744 modules (~80 106 channels). A module is a 6x2 cm2 detector with 46080 read-out channels; the pixel size is 50x400 mm2, but larger pixels are used to cover the space between the FE chips. It’s connected to the external world via a single (low mass) cable providing all the required services: Bias voltage Analog and digital LV Clock Serial command line Serial data outputs Temperature measurements The same module is used in the barrel and in the disks: staves (13 modules along the beam axis) for the barrel. sectors (6 modules on a two-sided octant) for the disks. Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Pixel Detector Module Breakdown PP0 connection Bump bonds Flex Hybrid Wire bonds Sensor tile 16 FE chips Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

ID Commissioning The installation in the ATLAS cavern was completed by July 07, but operation with the full detector cooled down was possible only starting from April 08. The preparation for the LHC collision era consisted of three main activities: Commissioning of the services; in particular the C3F8 evaporative cooling plant, damaged in an accident in May 08, required significant upgrades. Now the cooling system operates in a very stable way (-2o to 4.50C for the SCT, -20oC for the Pixel Detector). Detector calibration using the internal charge injection mechanism. Data taking with cosmics. SCT barrel installation, June 06 Pixel installation, July 07 Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Calibration procedures Given the enormous amount of channels and of free parameters to tune, the read- out electronics and the DAQ software were designed with particular attention to the calibration procedures. Just using the internal front-end electronics self-test and charge injection capabilities it’s possible to: Tune the custom rad-hard opto-link parameters to guarantee error free data transmission. Adjust the discriminator threshold of each channel to minimize threshold dispersion. Measure the noise of each channel. Tune the time-over-threshold (Pixel Detector). Pixel Detector opto-link tuning Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Structure of the pixel read-out cell The Pixel Detector FE cell contains: a constant (adjustable) feedback current pre-amp a discriminator a 5 bit DAC to adjust threshold a circuitry to measure time over threshold (ToT) an analog and a digital injection point Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Threshold uniformity Measuring the discriminator activation curve as a function of the injected charge it’s possible to determine threshold and noise. The Pixel Detector is operated at 3000-4000 e threshold, and the typical noise of regular size pixels is below 200 e. This large S/N ratio ensures excellent system stability, despite the huge number of channels and the high density. Similar considerations hold for the SCT; the noise is obviously larger, of the order of 1500 e, but well below the typical threshold set at 1 fC. Pixel Detector Pixel Detector Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Noise occupancy The occupancy due to noise can be calculated from the noise measured with the charge injection, or derived directly with a random trigger. The agreement between the two methods is good. The very low noise gives very low occupancies. SCT occupancy: ~10-5 Pixel Detector occupancy: ~10-10 masking less then 0.02% of the pixels. Pixel Detector 10 -10 Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Pixel Detector ToT Calibration The pixel read-out cell can measure (in 25 ns units) the time the discriminator input remains over threshold. This is correlated with the deposited charge. The pixel cell pre-amp feedback current can be adjusted to equalize the ToT response. Pixel Detector Pixel Detector Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Data taking with cosmics Cosmics have been taken in two long, dedicated periods; the first in 2008 (in preparation for the first LHC startup, and after September 19 accident) and the second in 2009. In total, several millions of cosmic muons have been detected, about 700k crossing the Pixel Detector. Even if not replacing collisions, cosmic muons were useful to: align the Inner Detector test the tracking algorithms and compute hit efficiency adjust detector timing test the trigger and data acquisition system 2008 2009 Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Alignment The alignment of the ID is performed in subsequent steps, varying the number of degrees of freedom. The first level only compensates for sub-detector global misalignments. The second is used to align sub-detector components and the third aligns the individual mechanical units. Using the cosmics, it was possible to complete the second alignment step and part of the third one in the barrel region. Practically, this level is already close to the ideal alignment, as demonstrated by the comparison of the residuals determined with cosmics events and with a perfectly aligned MC (24 vs 16 mm for the Pixel Detector Barrel, 30 vs 16 mm for the SCT Barrel). Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Hit efficiency The hit efficiency of each silicon layer can be measured performing a track fit without that layer and looking for hits aligned with the resultant tracks. Typical hit inefficiencies are of the order of 0.2%. Pixel Detector Barrel Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Lorentz angle measurement The Lorentz angle can be calculated as the track incidence angle corresponding to the minimum of the average cluster size. The minimum is at normal incidence when the solenoidal field is off. With field on, the measured values are: SCT: qL = 68.6 ± 0.5 ± 1.6 mrad Pixel Detector: qL = 213.9 ± 0.5 mrad Pixel Detector Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Detector timing Both SCT and Pixel Detector have multi-bunch crossing read-out capability (3 consecutive BC for the SCT, from 1 to 16 for the Pixel Detector). This capability increases detector efficiency in the initial phase, when the inter-module timing is not perfectly adjusted, and can be a useful tool to check the relative timing of different trigger components. The goal is to align the modules to 1 ns, as soon as the necessary track statistics will be available. Pixel Detector SCT Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

First collisions (at last…) After very quick injection and RF capturing commissioning, LHC started to produce pp collisions at 900 GeV on November 23 (!!!!!). In the following days, ATLAS collected 917 k collision candidates at 900 GeV and 34 k at 2.36 GeV (new world record). Thanks to the intense commissioning program, the silicon trackers arrived well prepared to this rendez-vous: 99.3% of strips active for the SCT, 97.9% of pixels active). However, for obvious security concerns, the two detectors were fully on only when stable beams condition was declared (538 k events). Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Few events… Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Improvements to the alignment One immediate benefit of the first LHC collisions was to bring the alignment of the detector parts less illuminated by the cosmics to the same level of the rest of the detector: SCT Barrel: 43 mm (MC 36 mm) PIX Barrel: 34 mm (MC 22 mm) SCT EC A: 87 mm (MC 46 mm) SCT EC C: 86 mm (MC 46 mm) PIX EC A: 28 mm (MC 24 mm) PIX EC C: 28 mm (MC 25 mm) The impact parameter resolution is consistent with the MC expectations. Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Pixel Detector dE/dx measurement The ToT resolution achieved with the internal calibration (15%) is sufficient to distinguish p from K in minimum bias events below 1 GeV/c. p K Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

Mass peaks with the ID The ID alignment obtained during the commissioning is good enough to identify Ks and L mass peaks in the sample of minimum bias events. The mass values agree with the PDG values, the resolutions with the MC expectations (dominated by multiple scattering). Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

On-line tracking Another indicator of the decent shape of the silicon tracker comes from the Level 2 trigger algorithms, that are largely based on the silicon components of the ID. These algorithms are simplified compared to the ones used in the off-line, but provide track reconstruction within the 10 ms Level 2 latency. As an example, the center of the beam spot region determined from the d0 vs f distribution of the tracks reconstructed on-line is in good agreement with the off-line. results. Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010

More than a conclusion… After a long and challenging commissioning phase, the ATLAS Silicon Tracker is in very good shape. 97.9% of the pixels and 99.3% of the SCT strips are operational. Noise occupancy and hit efficiency exceed the design specifications. The alignment is already close enough to the ideal one to allow on-line track reconstruction and invariant mass reconstruction. … a new beginning ! We are ready to start a new, and hopefully successful, LHC run… Paolo Morettini - VCI 2010 15/2/2010