The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains David Hardisty UBC Sauder ACR 2016, Berlin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When to pay? Consumer decisions about immediate vs future losses David Hardisty Haas Presentation.
Advertisements

"I can't stand waiting!" Dread looms larger than pleasurable anticipation 1 David Hardisty 1, Shane Frederick 2, & Elke Weber 1 1 Columbia University and.
Dental procedures and movie star kisses: Dread looms larger than savoring 1 David Hardisty 1, Shane Frederick 2, & Elke Weber 3 1 Stanford Graduate School.
Choosing energy efficiency David J. Hardisty Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia.
I Want It Now!: Query Theory Explains Discounting Anomalies for Gains and Losses Kirstin C. Appelt 1 David J. Hardisty 2 Elke U. Weber 1 1 Columbia University.
My Health – My Decision A class to help people who can make decisions be more involved in their healthcare decisions Created by: Anne Bates, Bill Hill,
Does Prospect Theory Hold in Intertemporal Choice? The interaction of time and risk in preferences for gains and losses David J. Hardisty & Jeff Pfeffer.
How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods David Hardisty, Katherine Thompson, Dave Krantz, & Elke Weber Columbia University.
Discounting of Environmental Goods and Discounting in Social Contexts David J. Hardisty 1 ; Kerry F. Milch 1 ; Kirstin Appelt 1 ; Michel J. J. Handgraaf.
 I can understand the definition of Economics.  I can understand why people have to make choices and that with choosing comes consequences.  I can.
Choice. There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?
15 Minute Leader Lesson Win it in a minute: Conserve resources with home energy management Managing home lighting Original art by Sydney Brown.
Tackling temporal tradeoffs in energy efficiency David J. Hardisty Behavioural Sustainability Group Oct 21, 2014.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Temporal Discounting of Losses David Hardisty UBC Presentation.
Energy Conservation Physics /24/03. Reducing energy consumption may help alleviate environmental problems: Conserve fossil fuel resources Reduce.
Give me a break! How turning off the television can give your TV and the Earth a break.
Encouraging Energy Efficiency: Product Labels Facilitate Temporal Tradeoffs David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia Yoonji Shim, University of.
The Value of Nothing: Asymmetric Attention to Opportunity Costs Drives Intertemporal Decision Making David J. Hardisty University of British Columbia Society.
The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains 1 David Hardisty University of British Columbia SCP.
Encouraging Energy Efficiency: Product Labels Facilitate Temporal Tradeoffs David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia Yoonji Shim, University of.
STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS JAMES SIPIOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST.
Interim Survey Results August Survey Overview  Date of survey: July 18, 2012 – August 6, 2012  300 participants  52 completed  17.3% response.
Find your comfort zone Upgrade your heating or cooling system and you can enjoy more than year-round comfort in your home. You’ll also enjoy saving money.
OPEN ENROLLMENT EMPLOYEE SURVEY Version 1 1.Were the communication materials provided to you over the last few weeks easy to understand?  Yes  No 2.Did.
1. How often do you shop for clothes each year? => I shop for clothes once a month. I usually buy them online. I can save money and time. 2. Why do you.
Chapter 15 Trade-offs Involving Time and Risk
Time Management.
Time Value of Money Present value of any the amount of money today that would future sum of money = be needed at current interest rates to.
Personal Awareness and Energy Consumption.
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
Behavioral Economics! Yep, another theory used to predict reinforcement effects This theory = Nobel Prize for Richard Thaler!
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
Intertemporal Choice - SS200 Behavioural Economics
Module 7.
Unit 3: Utility Ap Micro 9/27.
Choice Behavior Two.
The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains David Hardisty UBC S&P Workshop Jan 9th, 2017.
Scarcity, Choice and Opportunity Cost
Discussion questions. What does this mean? Who are most affected by the loss of natural resources and pollution? Who are the people who work in this.
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
Chapter Two: Characteristics of Entrepreneurs
How to Reduce Money Leakage During Work Replacement?
Cornerstones for Career College Success 3rd edition
Examining Lifestyle Goals and Factors
Nathan Dhaliwal, David J. Hardisty, Jiaying Zhao UBC Sauder
Chapter 15 Trade-offs Involving Time and Risk
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Honors Advanced Algebra Presentation 1-3
Steven Shechter David J. Hardisty* UBC Sauder *Presenting author
Choices, Values and Frames
Unit 11.
Lesson Planning Wednesday, October 7th.
The Sign Effect in Past and Future Discounting
WELCOME TO OUR LESSON. OUR TOPIC TODAY: “MY LEISURE TIME”.
The Sign Effect in Past and Future Discounting
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS: EVALUATING COSTS
David J. Hardisty, UBC Sauder
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
The sign effect in past and future discounting
Time Management Monday, January 26, 2015.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Improve Your GPA Grade-Point Average
Why should everybody have a budget?
Respite Planning And Funding Options
Respite Planning And Funding Options
Behavioral Economics! Yep, another theory used to predict reinforcement effects This theory = Nobel Prize for Richard Thaler!
Quattrone and Tversky 1998, Slovic 1987
Presentation transcript:

The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains David Hardisty UBC Sauder ACR 2016, Berlin

Co-Authors Shane Frederick Elke Weber 2

The “sign” effect Receive $70 now or $70 in a month? 100% choose now Pay $70 now or $70 in a month? 47% choose later Why?

Not loss aversion... Receive $140 now or $140 in a month? 100% choose now Pay $70 now or $70 in a month? 47% choose later Why? Anticipation asymmetries

Kiss from a movie star: now or next week? (Loewenstein, 1987) Discounting Anticipation

Scheduling a dental procedure Discounting Anticipation

Loewenstein (1987)

Loewenstein (1987)

Replication Data

Hypotheses Anticipation of losses > anticipation of gains Even when controlling for loss aversion Due to a qualitative difference Anticipation predicts choices This (partly) explains the “sign effect”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Negative Event “enjoying the moment”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Savoring Negative Event X “enjoying the moment”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Savouring Negative Event X “enjoying the moment”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event “enjoying the moment”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread “enjoying the moment”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread ??? “enjoying the moment”

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread Masochism “enjoying the moment” X

Anticipation: what do we call it? Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread Enjoying the Moment “enjoying the moment”

Overview Study 1a & 1b: Anticipation of $$ gains vs losses Study 2a: Real consumption Study 2b: Generalizing across domains Study 3: Controlling for loss aversion Study 4: Why the asymmetry?

Study 1a: Anticipation of $$ gains vs losses

Study 1: Methods Between subjects: gain vs. loss 201 MTurkers +$49 today OR +$60 in 89 days? -$49 today OR -$60 in 89 days? Imagine expecting to receive [pay] $60 in 89 days. How psychologically pleasurable or displeasurable would the anticipation be? In other words, how would you feel while waiting for it? strongly dislike the strongly like the feeling of waiting neutral feeling of waiting |-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------| 26 other intertemporal choices (Kirby, Petry, & Bickel 1999)

Study 1: Results Choices Gains: Chose SS gain 57% of the time (332% discount rate) Losses: Chose LL loss 26% of the time (34% discount rate) Anticipation Gains: -5 (SD = 55) Losses: -36 (SD = 46)

Study 1: Mediation

Study 1b: Consumer choice example

Suppose you were choosing between two window air conditioners, described below: * Energy savings [wasted] is the estimated difference in energy usage between the two AC units, based on 4 hours usage per day, 182 days per year, with an electricity rate of $0.1264 per kWh. Model A Price: $297 10-year energy savings*: $0 [10-year energy wasted*: $920] BTUs: 12,000 Watts: 2,000 Energy Efficiency Rating: 6.0 Model B Price: $776 10-year energy savings*: $920 [10-year energy wasted*: $0] Watts: 1,000 Energy Efficiency Rating: 12.0  

Study 1b: Methods Which would you choose? A choice of Model B over Model A [Model A over Model B] boils down to spending more [less] money up front in exchange for saving [wasting] money later. How would you feel while waiting for the future energy savings [waste]? Negative (Strongly dislike the feeling of waiting) Neutral (It is just a calculation; I'd feel nothing) Positive (Strongly like the feeling of waiting)

Study 1b: Results Choices: Positive frame: 61% chose “impatient" Model A Negative frame: 48% chose “impatient" Model A Anticipation: Positive frame: 21% positive anticipation, 50% neutral, 30% negative Negative frame: 13% positive anticipation, 51% neutral, 36% negative Anticipation mediates the effect of framing on choices

Study 1c: Real consumption, controlling for subjective value

Study 1c: Methods Randomly assigned to “Dirt” or “Toasted marshmallow” flavor jellybean (pretested) (Jellybeans visible in the experimental room) Everyone must wait one week to eat the jellybean Rated predicted experience utility and anticipation utility

Study 2: Generalizing across domains

Study 2: Events Positive Events: receiving a $50 check receiving a good grade or performance review spending time with your best friend improved energy and health for 10 days a free 5-day vacation to the destination of your choice watching your favorite TV show or reading a good book for an hour getting a gift in the mail from a family member eating a nice meal out at a restaurant winning the lottery a kiss from the movie star of your choice Negative Events: paying a $50 fine receiving a bad grade or performance review a confrontation with your co-worker or family member being sick for 10 days doing difficult home cleaning and renovation for 5 days filling out paperwork and waiting around for an hour at the local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) giving a stressful 60 minute improvised speech a painful dental procedure having one of your legs amputated getting twenty painful (but harmless) electric shocks in a research experiment

Study 3: Controlling for loss aversion

Study 3: Overview 106 participants from Amazon MTurk Dynamically identify subjectively equivalent gains and losses for each subject Compare anticipation for these subjectively equivalent pairs

Accept this pair of events? 50% chance of receiving 25 dollars AND 50% chance of paying 25 dollars Yes Unsure No

Accept this pair of events? 50% chance of receiving 500 dollars AND 50% chance of paying 25 dollars Yes Unsure No

Accept this pair of events? 50% chance of receiving 49 dollars AND 50% chance of paying 25 dollars Yes Unsure No

[50% chance of receiving a $49] Study 3: Stimulus Please consider the following event: [50% chance of receiving a $49] Assuming this event would definitely happen to you and you knew it were coming, when would you prefer it to happen? Immediately OR in one week

Time preferences Gains Losses Now 79% 57% In one week 21% 43%

Time preferences Gains Losses Now 79% 57% In one week 21% 43%

Pleasurable experience OR unpleasurable experience Study 3: Stimulus 2.a. Please imagine this event happening one week from now. Would experiencing this event be pleasurable or unpleasurable? Pleasurable experience OR unpleasurable experience 2.b. How strongly would experiencing this event affect your feelings at that time? not at all strongly extremely |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| (Wording based on McGraw et al, 2010)

Like the feeling of waiting OR Dislike the feeling of waiting Study 3: Stimulus 3.a. If this event were one week away, would the anticipation be psychologically pleasurable or unpleasurable? In other words, how would you feel while waiting for it? Like the feeling of waiting OR Dislike the feeling of waiting 3.b. How strongly would anticipating this event affect your feelings while waiting for the event? not at all strongly extremely |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Utility for experience and anticipation

Study 4: Why the asymmetry?

Study 4: Methods 105 participants from Amazon MTurk 10 positive & 10 negative events (same as Study 2) Time preference Two questions for anticipation: …how pleasurable or happy would the anticipation be? …how displeasurable or unhappy would the anticipation be?

Study 4 Results

Summary Anticipation of losses > anticipation of gains Even when experience utility is matched Anticipation of gains is emotionally mixed Anticipation of losses is more unidimensional Anticipation predicts choices This (partly) explains the “sign effect”

Thank You!

Typical Event Pair 21 68 .68 -.22** -55 -65 .15 -.38** Event Anticipation Experience Choice (1=prefer now) Regression Beta receiving a good grade or performance review 21 68 .68 -.22** receiving a bad grade or performance review -55 -65 .15 -.38**

event a e Corr(a,e) c beta (a) beta (e) a free 5-day vacation to the destination of your choice 28 75 .27** .19 -.40** .00 eating a nice meal out at a restaurant 59 .42** .29 -.31** .15 a kiss from the movie star of your choice 22 46 .38** .32 -.17* .34** receiving a good grade or performance review 21 68 .33** .68 -.22** -.01 getting a gift in the mail from a family member 64 .43** .49 -.35** spending time with your best friend 67 .24** .44 -.21** .14 watching your favorite TV show or reading a good book for an hour 13 52 .39** .57 -.27** .18* receiving a $50 check 66 .25** .78 .04 improved energy and health for 10 days 9 .69 .12 winning the lottery 6 83 .20* .79 .15* doing difficult home cleaning and renovation for 5 days -19 -13 .51** .02 -.36** .32** filling out paperwork and waiting around for an hour at the local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) -26 -35 .11 -.30** .26** paying a $50 fine -27 -39 -.28** .16 giving a stressful 60 minute improvised speech -45 -37 .45** -.10 -.20* being sick for 10 days -47 -65 .28** -.15 -.32** .22** a painful dental procedure -53 -63 .37** .18 -.44** receiving a bad grade or performance review -55 -.38** .31** a confrontation with your co-worker or family member -57 -60 .55** getting twenty painful (but harmless) electric shocks in a research experiment -58 -66 .41** .13 having one of your legs amputated -86 -.56 -.24**

Histogram of Vacation Anticipation Utility

Histogram of Dentist Anticipation Utility