Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
MERLIN 3.0 only considers first order (dipole) modes. Kick is linearly proportional to offset. For offsets close to the axis this is a reasonable approximation.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
OPTIMISATION OF BEAM INJECTION INTO THE FIRST ACCELERATING MODULE AT TTF2 WITH CAVITY DIPOLE MODE SIGNALS N. Baboi, H. Schlarb, M. Wendt, G. Kreps, DESY,
PEDM Review 12/7/091 Beam Position Monitors William Morse.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Tesla Meeting Frascati 27/05/03 C. Magne Cold BPM for TTF2 Tesla prototype - low beam impedance - cooling to 2K without strain - Low beam coupling impedance:
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
BPM Orbit Data Analysis with Wakefields Glen White, SLAC January 2013.
CLIC Drive Beam Beam Position Monitors International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva Steve Smith SLAC / CERN
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
The Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) Massimo Dal Forno Paolo Craievich, Raffaele De Monte, Thomas Borden, Andrea Borga, Mauro Predonzani, Mario Ferianis,
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) for future linear colliders such as CLIC. N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, et al. Royal.
Tomoyuki Sanuki, Daisuke Okamoto, Yosuke Honda, Toshiaki Tauchi TB&SGC meeting.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Beam Position Monitors for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC Meeting 21 January 2011 Steve Smith.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Shilun Pei with Chris Adolphsen, Zenghai Li, Karl L. Bane, et al. SLAC, Dec. 12, 2007 TTF.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Cavity BPM studies Marc Ross Explore uses (and limitations) of uwave cavity BPM’s Develop nanometer resolution 10x.
IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
Marc Ross T9 – Snowmass 2001 Closing Plenary T9 – Diagnostics M. Ross/R. Pasquinelli Thursday, July 19 RD: 1) determine mixing between z and x/y 2) determine.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
BPM for FF test (ATF2) Vladimir Vogel KEK 2nd Nano Workshop, KEK, December 12, 2004.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Long Range Wake Potential of BPM in Undulator Section Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Group Meeting
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Cavity BPM Simulations A. Liapine. Analysis of the Existing BPMs BINP KEK.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Progress report of the tilt monitor Daisuke OKAMOTO Tohoku University.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Intra-Pulse Feedback at the NLC Interaction Point Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass 2001.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 18/06/2015 High Gradient work shop 2015.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
Wakefield of cavity BPM In ATF2 ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
Wakefield Effect at ATF2
CAVITY BPM FOR CALIFES Claire Simon, Michel Luong, D. Bogard, P
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
NanoBPM Progress January 12, 2005 Steve Smith.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
12.4: SRF HOM Diagnostics: Experimental Results and Future Plans
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
> 50 dB ≤ 500 MHz Non-intercepting beam position measurement
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
MCP Electronics Time resolution, costs
Fabrication of KEK-ATF2 Q-BPM
SuperB Linac Beam Position Monitor
SuperB Linac VME Beam Position Monitor
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date Multibunch (ATF) results) Chip status Delete costs Get better drawing of cavity More details of cavity BPM scheme Bunch Tiltmeter Snowmass July 16, 2001

BPM Sensitive to Bunch Tilt Observation at ASSET: BPM Cavity power vs. beam position has minimum which depends on bunch tilt There is a small tilt signal in quadrature with position signal Add to other signals

Response of Cavity BPM to Point Charge Q d

Response of BPM to Tilted Bunch Centered in Cavity q q/2 Treat as pair of macroparticles: d/2 d/2 st q/2

Tilted bunch Point charge offset by d Centered, extended bunch tilted at slope d/st Tilt signal is in quadrature to displacement The amplitude due to a tilt of d/s is down by a factor of: with respect to that of a displacement of d (~bunch length / Cavity Period )

Example Bunch length st = 200 mm/c = 0.67 ps Tilt tolerance d = 200 nm Cavity Frequency F = 11.424 GHz Ratio of tilt to position sensitivity ½ft = 0.012 A bunch tilt of 200 nm / 200 mm yields as much signal as a beam offset of 0.012 * 200 nm = 2.4nm Need BPM resolution of ~ 2 nm to measure this tilt Challenging! Getting resolution Separating tilt from position Use higher cavity frequency?

Cavity BPM Parameters nm Parameter Value Comments Dipole frequency 11.4 GHz   Monopole frequency 7.17 GHz Cavity Radius 16 mm Wall Q ~6000 Ignoring beam duct, etc Cavity coupling  = 2 Loaded Q 2000 Bandwidth 6 MHz Beam aperture radius 6 mm Sensitivity 6 mV/nC/nm Bunch charge 1010 e- Per bunch Signal power @ 1mm -28 dBm Peak power Decay time 56 ns Required resolution  = 2 nm Noise Figure Budget 25 dB For  = 2 nm, thermal only Wakefield Kick 0.5 volt/pC/mm Long range Structure wakefield kick 1.8 volt/pC/mm Per structure Short-range wakefield ~1/200th of structure

Cavity Comments Signal adequate Wakefields OK Beam centering tolerance 1/10th of sturctures May want higher frequency Better position resolution More favorable tilt / position sensitivity ratio

Position-Tilt Discrimination Phase-sensitive detection Position jitter or dithering measures phase of position signal Quadrature part of signal is tilt + background One phase of residual common mode RF interference/leakage The higher the frequency the better!

What’s Next? Simulate signal, background Optimize cavity Does this sensitivity to bunch tilt lead to increased sensitivity in an RF bunch length monitor? Transverse cavity upstream of tilitmeter Titlemeter measures slope*bunch length Transverse cavity, detuned by maybe 8 MHz, provides internal calibration of tiltmeter.

Cavity BPM Calculation