Toxics Use Reduction Institute Alternatives Assessment: An Overview Pam Eliason Toxics Use Reduction Institute 978-934-3142.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson Learned from AUDMP/ NSET-Nepal NSET-Nepal AUDMP Working Group Meeting, Bandung Shiva Bahadur Pradhanang Ramesh Guragain 21 March.
Advertisements

Geneva, Switzerland, June 2000
Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
Transition to Safer Substitutes n Propyl Bromide Case Study Liz Harriman Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell.
1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
Clean Production in Action: Assessing Alternatives for Materials and Products Pam Eliason Toxics Use Reduction Institute ;
11 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Process Safety Promotion in the Process Industries 1 OECD Workshop on Sharing Experience in the Training.
References: J.A. & Geiser K. 2001: The precautionary principle stimulus for solutions and alternatives based environmental policy Menv. 2003: Québec adoptes.
Chemicals Policy Update Regulatory options for pollution prevention and toxics use reduction. Ken Zarker, P2 Section Manager Washington State Department.
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
YOUR LOGO HERE Risk Management How to manage the risks inherent in programs and special events.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Environmental Engineering
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
European Policy for Food Safety Research and Horizon 2020
INTEGRATING EHS INTO NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Multnomah County Health Department ►Essential Services ►FDA Food Standards ►PACE Tools for Food Program Excellence Lila Wickham March 17, 2004 ♣
Health and Safety Executive UK Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens in the Occupational Setting Dr Susy Brescia Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
© Toxics Use Reduction Institute University of Massachusetts Lowell Transitioning from TCE Reality vs Theory Taking the Lab to the Streets Heidi Wilcox.
Green Chemistry in Commerce Council Drivers for Innovation & Marketing Safer Products Yve Torrie, MA Lowell Center for Sustainable Production
PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLES AND TOOLS David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council May 31, 2011.
Assurance Case Approach TECNALIA Inspiring Business Novara November, 2013 TRIAL WS.
Translating Knowledge to On-the-Ground Results Henry L. Green, Hon. AIA National Institute of Building Sciences Congressional.
From Reaction to Prevention: Ensuring that TSCA Reform and Other Chemicals Policies Stimulate the Transition Towards Safer and More Sustainable Chemicals.
FRENCH GOVERNMENTAL PLANS AND NATIONAL LABOUR INSPECTORATE CAMPAIGN ON EXPOSURE OF EMPLOYEES TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LABOUR GENERAL DIRECTORATE 3rd and.
Substitution & Alternatives Assessment Tool Box NW Hazardous Materials Conference SeaTac 2015 Jonathan Rivin Waste Management Specialist.
Selected Texas A&M Agriculture Research High biomass and drought-tolerant crop research Genomics and biotechnology for biofuel feedstocks Alternative feedstocks.
The Landscape of State Chemicals Regulation Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production April 28, 2005.
1 REACH, the Future EU policy for Chemicals European Conference in Eretria April 27, 2004 Tony Musu – European Trade Union Technical Bureau/ETUC.
Chemical & Environment Considerations in Product Safety: Current research, legislation, and the public and industry response Chemical Safety Regulations.
RISK MANAGEMENT The process of weighing policy alternatives in the light of the results of risk assessment and, if required, selecting and implementing.
Green Chemistry & Commerce Council (GC3) A project of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Preventive Emergency Planning Emergency Plans should focus not just on response but on reducing risk Emergency Planning that focuses on risk should consider.
Policy Options to Support the Use of Green Chemistry Colin Price Research Director Oregon Environmental Council June 9, 2010.
Moving to Safer Alternatives Chemicals, Materials, Products Ken Geiser Lowell Center for Sustainable Production December 2, 2004.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
WHAT IS THE GC3? The Green Chemistry and Commerce Council (GC3) is a project of the Chemical Policy & Science Initiative at the Lowell Center for Sustainable.
Background Innovators Roundtable on Sustainable Business and Safer Chemistry Through the Supply Chain discussing barriers and opportunities in the application.
Can REACH become the New Global Model? Helsinki Chemicals Forum 20 May 2010 Jukka Malm, Director ECHA – Directorate of Assessment.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Federal and Regional Activities in Green Chemistry Pam Civie Toxics Use Reduction Institute ,
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy, (THL)
Green Chemistry as a tool to prevent
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Presented by Deborah Lange, Executive Director Steinbrenner Institute for Environmental Education and Research.
DARSHANA RAGHU MANAGEMENT. Risk Management Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated and.
State Chemicals Policy Mark Rossi. Safer Alternatives Restrictions Procurement Right-to-Know policies chemical Toxics Use Reduction / Pollution Prevention.
Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2015 Concluding Remarks Second Day Jukka Malm European Chemicals Agency.
Lowell Randel Global Cold Chain Alliance/ International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration.
This grey area will not appear in your presentation. Non-cosmetic Pesticide Use and Cancer An innovative model for precautionary policy development Heather.
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Scarce resources create opportunities costs, which renders the idea of a zero-risk society a noble but unattainable goal. 1.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute TURA and Tech Diffusion in the Plating and Food Industry Buenos Aires September 31, 2009 Janet Clark, Senior Associate Director.
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
Impact assessment and decision making
GREEN CHEMISTRY ARAVIND ES CE13M022.
Decision Making A quick and simple system for decision making.
Manny Marta, P.Eng. Project Lead
The Consortium for Environmental Risk Management, LLC
Curt Baranowski U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Private Sector Perspective: Key “Best Practices” that Strengthen Protection of Environment, Health and Safety while Facilitating Trade and Economic Development.
HIPAA Security Risk Assessment (SRA)
Constructing influence diagrams
Lowell Center for Sustainable Production
Presentation transcript:

Toxics Use Reduction Institute Alternatives Assessment: An Overview Pam Eliason Toxics Use Reduction Institute

Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell Reaction to Concerns Separate science (risk assessment) from policy (risk management) Place the burden for assuring safety on the government Reduce complex problems to simple algorithms Allow a certain acceptable level of harm Focus is on Problem Reduction

Proactive Focus Integrate science and policy Place the burden for avoiding harm on the technology developer Promote action in the face of uncertainty Promote innovation and improvement Focus is on Solution Promotion Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

What is Alternatives Assessment? Alternatives Assessment is a process for identifying and comparing potential chemical and non-chemical alternatives that can be used as substitutes to replace chemicals or technologies of high concern. Goals – Reduce risk by reducing hazard Avoid regrettable substitutions Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Alternatives Assessment: Focusing P2 on Substitution Rather than focus on one bad option, focus on choices and opportunities Move from problems to solutions Assure that the solutions advocated are preferable to the hazards being replaced Encourage transparency and documentation Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Uses for Alternatives Assessments Industries can evaluate safer substitutes for chemicals of concern Chemists and chemical engineers can select safer chemical processes and products in production processes Governments can evaluate potential substitutes before restricting chemical uses Advocates can document safer alternatives to chemicals of public concern Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Remember Consider the functionality of the chemical of concern as well as its inherent hazards Finding a safer alternative and getting industry to adopt the use of it are not the same thing Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

The Process of Assessing Alternatives Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Define Your Goal Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell Bans vs. promote adoption Scope of project What is safer?

ID Chemicals of Concern Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell What do we know about its hazards? How is it used? Who cares?

ID and Prioritize Uses Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell Products Industry sectors Avail. of alternatives Exposure potential

ID and Prioritize Alternatives Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell ID suite of alternatives Screen out bads Focus on most likely candidates

Compare Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell EH&S Technical Economic Social

Select Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell Depends on goals Consider data presentation

Promote Adoption Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell Implementation policy Incentives Promote research

Resources Data sources –EH&S –Uses –Exposure Tools Examples Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Thank You Pam Eliason Senior Associate Director, Industry Research Program Manager –Toxics Use Reduction Institute –600 Suffolk Street –Wannalancit Mills – 5 th Floor –Lowell, MA – (fax) Toxics Use Reduction Institute, University of Massachusetts Lowell