. viability selection sexual selection fecundity selection zygote

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium provides a framework for understanding how populations evolve.
Advertisements

Motivation Can natural selection change allele frequencies and if so,
Modeling Populations forces that act on allelic frequencies.
One-locus diploid model Goals: Predict the outcome of selection: when will it result in fixation, when in polymorphism Understand the effect of dominance.
Population Genetics. Mendelain populations and the gene pool Inheritance and maintenance of alleles and genes within a population of randomly breeding.
Mendelian Genetics in Populations: Selection and Mutation as Mechanisms of Evolution I.Motivation Can natural selection change allele frequencies and if.
Chapter 18 Chapter 18 The Evolution of Populations.
Population Genetics: Populations change in genetic characteristics over time Ways to measure change: Allele frequency change (B and b) Genotype frequency.
Mendelian Genetics in Populations: Selection and Mutation as Mechanisms of Evolution I.Motivation Can natural selection change allele frequencies and if.
One-way migration. Migration There are two populations (x and y), each with a different frequency of A alleles (px and py). Assume migrants are from population.
Population Genetics. Macrophage CCR5 CCR5-  32.
CSS 650 Advanced Plant Breeding Module 3: Changes in gene frequency due to selection.
What evolutionary forces alter
Chapter 23~ Microevolution- small changes in the genetics of populations.
Maintaining Genetic Variation (Population Equilibrium) Populations have TWO competing factors: Remaining stable (not evolving) vs Changing (evolving)
BIOLOGY 30 POPULATION GENETICS. CHAPTER OUTCOMES Define a gene pool. Describe the gene pool of a population at genetic equilibrium. Summarize the five.
Lecture Evolution Chapter 19~ Evolutionary change in Populations.
A Brief Look at Population Genetics and the Quantitative Study of Natural Selection.
14 Population Genetics and Evolution. Population Genetics Population genetics involves the application of genetic principles to entire populations of.
Mendelian Genetics in Populations: Selection and Mutation as Mechanisms of Evolution I.Motivation Can natural selection change allele frequencies and if.
II. Deviations from HWE A. Mutation B. Migration C. Non-Random Mating D. Genetic Drift - Sampling Error E. Selection 1. Measuring “fitness” – differential.
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding Module 3: Changes in gene frequency due to selection.
12.4 Warning coloration in a western coral snake (Micrurus euryxanthus) Adaptation and Natural Selection.
Microevolution. 1.Natural Selection 2.Random genetic drift 3.Migration 4.Nonrandom mating Mechanisms that alter existing genetic variation.
Chapter 23 – The Evolution of Populations
Remainder of Chapter 23 Read the remaining materials; they address information specific to understanding evolution (e.g., variation and nature of changes)
Evolution of Populations. The Smallest Unit of Evolution Natural selection acts on individuals, but only populations evolve – Genetic variations contribute.
Evolution, Adaptation, Natural Selection and Fitness Dr Pupak Derakhshandeh, PhD Assiss. Prof. of Medical Science of Tehran University.
1 Average: 79.3 Question 21 had no answer and was thrown out. Denominator was 24 instead of 25.
Chap 23 Evolution of Populations Genotype p2p2 AA 2pqAa q2q2 aa Phenotype Dominantp 2 + 2pq Recessiveq2q2 Gene pA qa p + q = 1 p 2 + 2pq + q 2 = 1.
Objective: Chapter 23. Population geneticists measure polymorphisms in a population by determining the amount of heterozygosity at the gene and molecular.
Lab 5: Selection. Relative fitness(ω)  Average number of surviving progeny of one genotype compared to a competitive genotype.  Survival rate = “N”
Chapter 15 (Pg ).  To an evolutionary biologist—having more fertile offspring than other individuals  Being adapted to a particular environment.
Chapter 23 The Evolution of Populations. Modern evolutionary theory is a synthesis of Darwinian selection and Mendelian inheritance Evolution happens.
 The reproductive success of an individual over its lifetime is known as its fitness.  When individuals differ in their fitness selection takes place.
Evolution of Populations Population- group of individuals of the same species that live in the same area and interbreed. Gene Pool- populations genetic.
POPULATIONS MUTATION SELECTION DRIFT MIGRATION + — +/ — —
Chapter 17 Population Genetics and Evolution, part 3
OUTLINE 22 Forces that disrupt HW equilibrium
Life cycle with under Hardy-Weinberg assumptions
III. Modeling Selection
Mutation source of all new alleles and genes
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium provides a framework for understanding how populations evolve.
Natural Selection Garielle Wagnac.
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium provides a framework for understanding how populations evolve.
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium provides a framework for understanding how populations evolve.
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is a mathematical/statistical equation for understanding how populations evolve.
The Evolution of Populations
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS)
What is the frequency of A1 in the next generation?
Individuals may differ in fitness because of their underlying genotype
POPULATIONS MUTATION SELECTION DRIFT MIGRATION + — +/ — —
Diversity of Individuals and Evolution of Populations
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating
AP Biology Chapter 23 The Evolution of Populations.
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium provides a framework for understanding how populations evolve.
CHAPTER 13 How Populations Evolve
Genetic drift in finite populations
Adaptation and Natural Selection
Chapter 23 – The Evolution of Populations
Population genetics.
What is the frequency of A1 in the next generation?
Modern Evolutionary Biology I. Population Genetics
Vocabulary A species is a group of individuals with the potential to interbreed to produce fertile offspring. A population is a localized group of individuals.
Testing for Selective Neutrality
Population Genetics I. Basic Principles A. Definitions:
Evolution of senescence: Alzheimer's disease and evolution
Chapter 23: The Evolution of Populations
KEY CONCEPT Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium provides a framework for understanding how populations evolve.
Lecture #10 Date ________
Presentation transcript:

. viability selection sexual selection fecundity selection zygote survival to adult . courtship sexual selection fertilization sexual selection gamete production fecundity selection

Fitness = individual’s genetic contribution to the next generation (zygotezygote); differential survival and/or reproduction absolute fitness, Wij = #offspring, lifespan, etc relative fitness, wij = contribution relative to other genotypes selection differential, sij = strength of selection against a genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 Pr(survival) Wij 80% 40% 20% wij 1.0 0.5 0.25 sij 0 0.5 0.75

A numerical example Find the new genotype and allele frequencies A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 genotype freq. 0.25 0.50 0.25 wij 1.0 0.75 0.25 Survival after selection 0.25(1) 0.5(0.75) 0.25(0.25) 0.25 0.375 0.0625 But what is the sum of these? 0.6875 To make them sum to one (for a new frequency) you must divide by 0.6875 What is 0.6875? It is the mean fitness. (p2w11 +2pqw12+q2w22) New genotype frequencies 0.363 0.546 0.091 What are the new allele frequencies? A1 ~ 0.64 (0.5) A2 ~ 0.36 (0.5) w ’ = 0.363(1) + 0.546(0.75) + 0.091(0.25) = 0.7954

How does selection change genotype and allele frequencies? A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 geno. freq. p2 2pq q2 relative fitness, wij w11 w12 w22 geno. freq. p2w11 2pqw12 q2w22 after selection w w w average relative fitness, w = p2w11 + 2pqw12 + q2w22

Patterns of selection -- Fitness arrays A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 w11 w12 w22 deleterious recessive 1 1 1-s recessive lethal 1 1 0 deleterious dominant 1 1 1+s deleterious dominant 1 1-s 1-s deleterious intermediate 1 1-hs 1-s deleterious recessive 1 1+s 1+s heterozygote advantage 1-s 1 1-t heteroz. disadvantage 1+s 1 1+t

Selection against a recessive allele A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 initial g.f. P2 2pq q2 rel. fitness 1 1 1-s w = p2(1) + 2pq(1) + q2(1-s) = 1 – q2s g.f. > selection p2(1) 2pq(1) q2(1-s) 1-q2s 1-q2s 1-q2s

A numerical example A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 gen. freq. 0.25 0.50 0.25 wij 1.0 1.0 0.4 gen. freq. 0.25(1) 0.5(1) 0.25(0.4) > selection 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.294 0.588 0.118 f’(A1) ~ 0.59 (0.5) f’(A2) ~ 0.42 (0.5) w ’ = 0.294(1) + 0.588(1) + 0.25(0.4) = 0.982

what is the new frequency of A2 ? q’ = Q’ + H’ = + = q’ = 1 2 pq 1-sq2 q2(1-s) 1-sq2 recall that p = 1 - q and q = 1 - p q2(1-s) + pq 1-sq2 q2 – sq2 + q – q2 1-sq2 q(1-sq) 1-sq2

change in the frequency of a lethal recessive in Tribolium castaneum

change in the frequency of a deleterious recessive 2

what is the new frequency of A2 ? q’ = Q’ + H’ = + = q’ = 1 2 pq 1-sq2 q2(1-s) 1-sq2 recall that p = 1 - q and q = 1 - p q2(1-s) + pq 1-sq2 q2 – sq2 + q – q2 1-sq2 q(1-sq) 1-sq2

how much has the frequency of A2 changed after one generation of selection ? Dq = q’ - q = - q = Dq = q(1-sq) 1-sq2 q – sq2 – q + sq3 1-sq2 -sq2(1 – q) 1-sq2

selection against a deleterious recessive allele Dq q

Selection against a dominant allele A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 initial g.f. P2 2pq q2 rel. fitness 1 1-s 1-s w = p2(1) + 2pq(1-s) + q2(1-s) = 1 – sq(2p-q) g.f. > selection p2(1) 2pq(1-s) q2(1-s) 1-sq(2p-q) 1-sq(2p-q) 1-sq(2p-q)

change in the frequency of a deleterious dominant

Selection against a dominant allele Dq q

Selection favoring heterozygotes A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 initial g.f. P2 2pq q2 rel. fitness 1-s 1 1-t w = p2(1-s) + 2pq(1) + q2(1-t) = 1 – p2s - q2t g.f. > selection p2(1-s) 2pq(1) q2(1-t) 1 – p2s - q2t 1 – p2s - q2t 1 – p2s - q2t

q-tq2 1-sp2-tq2 p-sp2 1-sp2-tq2 Dq = - q and Dp = - p at equilibrium, Dq = 0 and Dp = 0 q-tq2 w = q p-sp2 = p w 1 – tq 1 - sp = w w tq = sp = s(1-q) s s + t > q = > t s + t p =

heterozygote advantage Dq

heterozygote advantage at phosphoglucose isomerase in Colias butterflies

glycolysis

enzyme kinetics of phosphoglucose isomerase in Colias

. . . . expected heterozygosity deviation from July .15 .10 .05 -.05 -.05 -.10 3 11 17 23 July

Selection against heterozygotes A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 initial g.f. P2 2pq q2 rel. fitness 1+s 1 1+t w = p2(1+s) + 2pq(1) + q2(1+t) = 1 + p2s + q2t g.f. > selection p2(1+s) 2pq(1) q2(1+t) 1+p2s+q2t 1+p2s+q2t 1+p2s+q2t

at equilibrium, Dq = 0 and Dp = 0 > s s + t t s + t > q = and p =

heterozygote disadvantage

heterozygote disadvantage: translocation heterozygotes in Drosophila

simple models of selection w11 > w12 < w22 w11 > w12 > w22 unstable polymorphism fix A1 relative fitness of A1A1 w11 < w12 > w22 w11 < w12 < w22 stable polymorphism fix A2 relative fitness of A2A2

relative fitness enables different traits and populations to be compared selection can act at many stages in the life cycle; opportunity for opposing selection at different stages directional selection fixes one allele and eliminates all others from the population heterozygote advantage can maintain a balanced polymorphism, but cannot explain the high levels of genetic variation found in natural populations heterozygote disadvantage produces an unstable polymorphism; which allele is fixed depends on chance