Department of Bioscience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sampling Design, Spatial Allocation, and Proposed Analyses Don Stevens Department of Statistics Oregon State University.
Advertisements

Chapter 9: Simple Regression Continued
Combining Information from Related Regressions Duke University Machine Learning Group Presented by Kai Ni Apr. 27, 2007 F. Dominici, G. Parmigiani, K.
Bayesian Estimation in MARK
Learning Objectives 1 Copyright © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning Data Analysis: Bivariate Correlation and Regression CHAPTER sixteen.
Testing hydrological models as hypotheses: a limits of acceptability approach and the issue of disinformation Keith Beven, Paul Smith and Andy Wood Lancaster.
Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Case Studies Lecture Five.
Computing the Posterior Probability The posterior probability distribution contains the complete information concerning the parameters, but need often.
European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2006 Vienna, Austria, 02 – 07 April 2006 Paper’s objectives: 1. Contribute to the validation of MODIS aerosol.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
CHAPTER 30 Structural Equation Modeling From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach,
Space-time Modelling Using Differential Equations Alan E. Gelfand, ISDS, Duke University (with J. Duan and G. Puggioni)
1 Spatial and Spatio-temporal modeling of the abundance of spawning coho salmon on the Oregon coast R Ruben Smith Don L. Stevens Jr. September.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Pin-point plant cover data Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus University.
Spatial Interpolation of monthly precipitation by Kriging method
MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS OF WILDLIFE BIOLOGY DATA Bret A. Collier 1 and T. Wayne Schwertner 2 1 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, Texas A&M University,
Chapter 3: Introductory Linear Regression
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Bayesian Extension to the Language Model for Ad Hoc Information Retrieval Hugo Zaragoza, Djoerd Hiemstra, Michael Tipping Presented by Chen Yi-Ting.
Renewable Energy Research Laboratory University of Massachusetts Prediction Uncertainties in Measure- Correlate-Predict Analyses Anthony L. Rogers, Ph.D.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring plant abundance and ecological processes with the pin-point method Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
Geographic Information Science
Why are there more kinds of species here compared to there? Theoretical FocusConservation Focus – Latitudinal Gradients – Energy Theory – Climate Attributes.
Components of plant species diversity in the New Zealand forest Jake Overton Landcare Research Hamilton.
Regression Chapter 16. Regression >Builds on Correlation >The difference is a question of prediction versus relation Regression predicts, correlation.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Integrating monitoring data across different data types, locations and habitat types Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus.
Analyzing wireless sensor network data under suppression and failure in transmission Alan E. Gelfand Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences Duke.
Chapter 16 Social Statistics. Chapter Outline The Origins of the Elaboration Model The Elaboration Paradigm Elaboration and Ex Post Facto Hypothesizing.
Global Analyzing community data with joint species distribution models abundance, traits, phylogeny, co-occurrence and spatio-temporal structures Otso.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Measuring competitive interactions in natural plant populations Christian Damgaard Bioscience Aarhus University.
- 1 - Preliminaries Multivariate normal model (section 3.6, Gelman) –For a multi-parameter vector y, multivariate normal distribution is where  is covariance.
Combining pin-point and Braun-Blanquet plant cover data
Hierarchical models. Hierarchical with respect to Response being modeled – Outliers – Zeros Parameters in the model – Trends (Us) – Interactions (Bs)
Hierarchical Models. Conceptual: What are we talking about? – What makes a statistical model hierarchical? – How does that fit into population analysis?
Prediction and Missing Data. Summarising Distributions ● Models are often large and complex ● Often only interested in some parameters – e.g. not so interested.
Bioscience – Aarhus University Modelling the joint abundance of more plant species - pin-point cover data Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience Aarhus.
Bayesian SPARROW Model Song Qian Ibrahim Alameddine The University of Toledo American University of Beirut.
Stochasticity and Probability. A new approach to insight Pose question and think of the answer needed to answer it. Ask: How do the data arise? What is.
Estimation of surface characteristics over heterogeneous landscapes from medium resolution sensors. F. Baret 1, S. Garrigues 1, D. Allard 2, R. Faivre.
The distribution of ostebund aggregations (Porifera) in relation to oceanographic processes in the Faroe-Shetland Channel. Joshua Davison1, Nils Piechaud1,
Heathland field trip Pony Grazing © Amy Rogers © Carl Corbidge
Hierarchical Models.
Regression Analysis Part D Model Building
Regression and Correlation
Chris Pruden Mentor: Grant Casady PhD
Temporal and spatial variability in stand structure and individual-tree growth for 10 years following commercial thinning in spruce-fir forests of northern.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
CH 5: Multivariate Methods
CHAPTER fourteen Correlation and Regression Analysis
Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Jili Qu Department of Environmental and Architectural College
Statistical Challenges in Climatology
Michael Epstein, Ben Calderhead, Mark A. Girolami, Lucia G. Sivilotti 
J. Zhu, A. Ahmed and E.P. Xing Carnegie Mellon University ICML 2009
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
CSCI 5822 Probabilistic Models of Human and Machine Learning
Predictive distributions
Least Squares Method: the Meaning of r2
Regression in the 21st Century
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Host Genetic Control of the Oral Microbiome in Health and Disease
Product moment correlation
Lev Tarasov, Radford Neal, and W. R. Peltier University of Toronto
by Wei-Ping Chan, I-Ching Chen, Robert K
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Regression and Correlation of Data
A Data Partitioning Scheme for Spatial Regression
Classical regression review
Mapping Natural Capital
Presentation transcript:

Department of Bioscience Spatio-temporal structural equation modeling in a hierarchical Bayesian framework: ecology of wet heathlands Christian Damgaard Department of Bioscience Aarhus University

Erica tetralix is decreasing on Danish wet heathlands Characteristic species of wet heathlands What is the cause? What management actions may reverse the trend? Cover (%)

Wet heathland vegetation data The cover of the three dominating species on wet heathlands, Erica tetralix, Calluna vulgaris and Molinia caerulea, as well as all other higher plant species was determined by the pin-point method Time series data (2007 – 2014) from 39 sites with a total of 1322 plots Important: pin-point cover data allows the aggregation of species

Cover data are L or U - shaped Plant species are patchy distributed ⇒ cover data are L or U - shaped

Joint distribution of cover data The Dirichlet-multinomial distribution models pin-point cover data of n species – accounts for spatial aggregation 𝑦 𝑖 : pin-point hits of species i; 𝑛 𝑦 𝑖 ≥ # of grid points 𝑝 𝑖 : relative cover of species i; 𝑛 𝑝 𝑖 =1 𝐸 𝑝 1 ,… ,𝑝 𝑛−1 = 𝑞 1 ,… ,𝑞 𝑛−1 𝛿: intra-plot correlation due to spatial aggregation 𝑌~𝑀𝑛 𝑛 𝑦 𝑖 , 𝑝 1 ,… ,𝑝 𝑛−1 ,1− 𝑝 1 −…− 𝑝 𝑛−1 Λ 𝑝 1 ,… ,𝑝 𝑛−1 ~𝐷𝑖𝑟 𝑞 1 −𝑞 1 𝛿 𝛿 ,…, 𝑞 𝑛−1 − 𝑞 𝑛−1 𝛿 𝛿 , 1−𝛿 𝛿 − 𝑞 1 −𝑞 1 𝛿 𝛿 −…− 𝑞 𝑛−1 − 𝑞 𝑛−1 𝛿 𝛿

Spatial and temporal model (SEM) Green oval: data Black box: latent variables Black arrow: spatial proc. Red arrow: temporal proc. Only two years shown

Spatial and temporal model (SEM) The latent variables allow the separation of measurement errors and process errors. Only process errors are needed for predictions Only two years shown

Estimation Hierarchical Bayesian modelling approach MCMC - Metropolis-Hastings algorithm Statistical inferences on the parameters of interest were based on the marginal posterior distribution of the parameters

Spatial process (2007) Large uncertainty – especially Calluna (yellow dots) – history? Dwarf shrubs (Erica and Calluna) have same qualitative response, and opposite to Molinia and other plants Positive spatial effects of nitrogen deposition, pH, sandy soils, and low precipitation on dwarf shrubs Standardized regression coefficients

Geographic latent factors Regional geographic variation (50 km scale) South Jutland behave qualitatively different Information may be used to generate new hypotheses

Temporal process (2007 - 2014) Good fit! Dwarf shrubs (Erica and Calluna) have same qualitative response as the spatial effects, and opposite to Molinia and other plants Negative effect of grazing on Erica – insufficient data resolution Standardized regression coefficients

Application: local prediction Collect data from 20 to 40 plots Only temporal process is relevant (good model fit) Prediction of the effect of local management actions Set-up of an adaptive management plan

Conclusions Important to take local spatial aggregation of plant abundance into account Plant cover data are U-shaped Possible to fit ecological models to multivariate abundance data instead of summarizing the variation by ad hoc distance methods e.g. Bray-Curtis distances in ordination techniques Important to separate measurement errors from structural uncertainty when making predictions Ecological processes are best studied using time-series data