National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hearing Sounds and Silences By: Erin Sanders Emily Chandler.
Advertisements

Health and Wellness for all Arizonans azdhs.gov Dr Bradley Golner, MD Phoenix Pediatrics Az EHDI Chapter Champion.
Using Part C of IDEA to Support Statewide EHDI Programs Karl White, Ph.D. National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management Utah State University
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) ~ Challenges and Opportunities ~
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the Year 2000.
Tracking and Data Management Technical Assistance Workshop for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Margaret Lubke, Ph.D. National Center.
Evaluation Utahs Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program of Karl R. White, PhD National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management Utah State.
The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States Karl R. White, PhD National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management Utah.
Data and Patient Information Management Systems for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs.
The Physicians Role in the Development of Effective Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs.
A National Technical Assistance System for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs in the United States.
EHDI Systems and the Medical Home Carlos Quezada-Gomez, PsyD National Center of Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs American Academy.
A National Technical Assistance System for EHDI Programs.
The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.
National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management
Simplifying Reporting of Communication Development Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss Karen Anderson, PhD Florida EHDI Audiology Consultant.
Is Early Intervention Necessary for All? Ruth Fox, RN, MS, New Hampshire EHDI Program Coordinator Mary Jane Sullivan, Au D, New Hampshire EHDI Consulting.
Engaging Audiologists in EHDI Data Systems Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM & Arizona School of Health Sciences Randi Winston, Au.D. NCHAM & The EAR Foundation.
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in Mississippi EHDI-M Overcoming Barriers to Timely Diagnosis of Hearing Loss.
Parent Perspectives on EHDI and Communication Choices Katherine Baldwin 2nd Annual National EHDI Conference February 26, 2003.
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Minnesota: “1-3-6” Early Intervention by 6 Mo.
An Audiological Management Manual for UNHS Referrals Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D. Karen Ditty, M.S. Kathleen Watts, M.A. Diane Sabo, Ph.D. Karen Munoz,
Effective Hearing Screening Practices in Health Care Settings Randi Winston, William Eiserman, Lenore Shisler.
Evaluation of EHDI Programs Terry Foust Karen Muñoz Kathleen Watts NCHAM Technical Assistance.
Early Intervention Applications: Connecticut Guidelines Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D., CCC-A 1, 2 Linda Goodman, M.A., M.P.A. 2 Lynn Skene Johnson, M.S.
National EHDI Meeting EHDI-Related Efforts in the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Lisa Holden-Pitt Education Research Analyst Research to Practice.
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Early Intervention Outcomes Recent Findings and Future Challenges Mary Pat Moeller Boys Town National Research Hospital.
The Ethics of Serving Infants and Their Families Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM & Arizona School of Health Sciences Karen Munoz, M.S. NCHAM & Northern Illinois.
Cochlear Implants in Children
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Missouri Newborn Hearing Screening: A status report Jenna M. Bollinger, B.A. Department of Communication Disorders & Deaf Education Fontbonne University.
Chapter Eleven Individuals with Hearing Impairments.
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) ~ Challenges and Opportunities ~
What’s Missing Hear? Michigan Academy of Physician Assistants (MAPA) October 11, 2013 Dee Robertson, MA, CRC, Community Consultant Michigan Early Hearing.
I HEAR Manitoba (Infant Hearing Early Assessment & Referral) Leanne Gardiner, Au.D. Coordinator- Infant Hearing Screening Program.
Severe hearing loss in children: background information Nan Bernstein Ratner, F-AAAS Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences University of Maryland,
Increasing Access to Hearing Screening for Out of Hospital Births.
Goals and Objectives 1.Identify barriers to follow-up after referred NHS through the perceptions amongst stakeholders (i.e. parents, screeners, doctors,
Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June.
New York State Department of Health Outcomes of New York’s Newborn Hearing Screening Program Lynn Spivak, Ph.D., CCC-A Connie Donohue, M.A., CCC-A.
Using Birth Certification to Reach Families lost to Hearing Screening Follow-up Jeffrey Duncan, M.S. Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics.
Maria Roetto & Liz Hankins Utah State University LOCAL PHYSICIAN OUTREACH: NEWBORN HEARING EDUCATION AND RESOURCES.
Evaluation of EHDI Programs ________________________ Terry Foust, Au.D., CCC-A/SLP Karen Muñoz, Ph.D., CCC-A Kathleen Watts, M.S. National Center for Hearing.
Alison King, MSP, CCC-SLP, LSLS Cert.AVT. Gain a better understanding of the unique role that medical and educational facilities have in assisting students.
A Medical Home for Children with Hearing Loss Julia L. Hecht, M.D., Deaf Access Program Albuquerque, New Mexico.
EVALUATING AN EHDI SYSTEM: PARENT SURVEY PROJECT Vickie Thomson, MA State EHDI Coordinator Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Janet DesGeorges.
Children with Hearing Loss in Hawai`i: Early and Late Identified (Session #8) 2006 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Conference Washington, D.C.
CHAPTER 14 UNDERSTANDING STUDENTS WITH HEARING LOSS.
Chapter 14 Understanding Students with Hearing Loss.
Newborn Hearing Screening. R EPUBLIC A CT N O AN ACT ESTABLISHING A UNIVERSAL NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROGRAM FOR THE PREVENTION, EARLY DIAGNOSIS.
An Analysis of “Lost To Follow-up” Infants Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM Mississippi Bend AEA-Iowa.
Infants & Toddlers with HL Chapter 14
COORDINATION Hospital-Based Newborn Hearing Screen
Language Outcomes, Growth, and Predictors of Success: A Multi-State (NECAP) Perspective WREIC June 16, 2017.
Review and management of children identified with a transient conductive hearing loss within the context of a newborn hearing screening program Alison.
NEWBORN DEVELOPMENT RISK ASSESSMENT:
The Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Program Overview
Factors that Influence Hospital Screening Programs
Barriers to Follow-up in Newborn Hearing Screening Programs
Blindness separates people from things.
First Annual National EHDI Meeting
Are EHDI Systems Missing Children With Minimal Hearing Loss?
Organizing the Hospital Program
CHAPTER 14: Understanding Children with Hearing Loss
Early Childhood Special Education
Identifying Qualified Audiologists for Assessment of Babies
Tracking and Data Management
Connecting with Appropriate Early Intervention Programs
Presentation transcript:

National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States Karl R. White, PhD National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management Utah State University www.infanthearing.org

Number of Hospitals Doing Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Number of Programs

Why is Implementation of Newborn Hearing Screening Accelerating? Improved Screening Techniques/Equipment

Why is Implementation of Newborn Hearing Screening Accelerating? Improved Screening Techniques/Equipment Acceptance by Policy Makers

Endorsements for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening National Institutes of Health American Academy of Pediatrics Maternal and Child Health Bureau Centers for Disease Control & Prevention Joint Committee on Infant Hearing American Academy of Audiology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Association of the Deaf

Why is Implementation of Newborn Hearing Screening Accelerating? Improved Screening Techniques/Equipment Increased Number of Acceptance by Successful Programs Policy Makers

Why is Implementation of Newborn Hearing Screening Accelerating? Improved Screening Techniques/Equipment Acceptance by Increased Number of Policy Makers Successful Programs Public Awareness/Demand

Blindness separates people from things. Deafness separates people from people. --- Helen Keller

Why is Early Identification of Hearing Loss so Important? Hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect.

Rate Per 1000 of Permanent Childhood Hearing Loss in UNHS Programs Sample Prevalence Site Size Per 1000 Rhode Island (3/93 - 6/94) 16,395 1.71 Colorado (1/92 - 12/96) 41,976 2.56 New York (1/95 - 12/97) 69,761 1.95 Texas (1/94 - 6/97) 52,508 2.15 Hawaii (1/96 - 12/96) 9,605 4.15 New Jersey (1/93 - 12/95) 15,749 3.30

Incidence per 10,000 of Congenital Defects/Diseases

Why is Early Identification of Hearing Loss so Important? Hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect. Undetected hearing loss has serious negative consequences.

Reading Comprehension Scores of Hearing and Deaf Students Grade Equivalents Age in Years Schildroth, A. N., & Karchmer, M. A. (1986). Deaf children in America, San Diego: College Hill Press.

Effects of Unilateral Hearing Loss Normal Hearing Unilateral Hearing Loss Keller & Bundy (1980) Math (n = 26; age = 12 yrs) Language Peterson (1981) Math (n = 48; age = 7.5 yrs) Language Bess & Thorpe (1984) Social (n = 50; age = 10 yrs) Math Blair, Peterson & Viehweg (1985) (n = 16; age = 7.5 yrs) Language Math Culbertson & Gilbert (1986) (n = 50; age = 10 yrs) Language Social Average Results 0th 10th 20th 30th 40th 50th 60th Math = 30th percentile Percentile Rank Language = 25th percentile Social = 32nd percentile

Effects of Mild Fluctuating Conductive Hearing Loss Teele, et al., 1990 ) 194 children followed prospectively from 0-7 years. ) Days child had otitis media between 0-3 years assessed during normal visits to physician. ) Data on intellectual ability, school achievement, and language competency individually measured at 7 years by "blind" diagnosticians. ) Results for children with less than 30 days OME were compared to children with more than 130 days adjusted for confounding variables. Effect Size for Outcome Measure Less vs. More OME WISC-R Full Scale .62 Metropolitan Achievement Test Math .48 Reading .37 Goldman Fristoe Articulation .43 Teele, D.W., Klein, J.O., Chase, C., Menyuk, P., Rosner, B.A., and the Greater Boston Otitis media Study Group (1990). Otitis media in infancy and intellectual ability, school achievement, speech, and language at age 7 years. The Journal of Infectious Diseases , 162 , 685-694.

Why is Early Identification of Hearing Loss so Important? Hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect. Undetected hearing loss has serious negative consequences. There are dramatic benefits associated with early identification of hearing loss.

Yoshinaga-Itano, et al., 1996 6 Compared language abilities of hearing-impaired children identified before 6 months of age (n = 46) with similar children identified after 6 months of age (n = 63). 6 All children had bilateral hearing loss ranging from mild to profound, and normally-hearing parents. 6 Language abilities measured by parent report using the Minnesota Child Development Inventory (expressive and comprehension scales) and the MacArthur Communicative Developmental Inventories (vocabulary). 6 Cross-sectional assessment with children categorized in 4 different age groups. Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A., Apuzzo, M., Carey, A., Day, D., & Coulter, D. (July 1996). The effect of early identification on the development of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants and toddlers . Paper presented at the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Meeting, Austin, TX.

Expressive Language Scores for Hearing Impaired Children Identified Before and After 6 Months of Age 35 30 25 Language Age in Months 20 15 10 Identified BEFORE 6 Months 5 Identified AFTER 6 Months 13-18 mos 19-24 mos 25-30 mos 31-36 mos (n = 15/8) (n = 12/16) (n = 11/20) (n = 8/19) Chronological Age in Months

Vocabulary Size for Hearing Impaired Children Identified Before and After 6 Months of Age 300 250 200 Vocabulary Size 150 100 Identified BEFORE 6 Months 50 Identified AFTER 6 Months 13-18 mos 19-24 mos 25-30 mos 31-36 mos (n = 15/8) (n = 12/16) (n = 11/20) (n = 8/19) Chronological Age in Months

Boys Town National Research Hospital Study of Earlier vs. Later ) 129 deaf and hard-of-hearing children assessed 2x each year. ) Assessments done by trained diagnostician as normal part of early intervention program. 6 Identified <6 mos (n = 25) 5 Identified >6 mos (n = 104) 4 Language Age (yrs) 3 2 1 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.2 3.8 4.2 4.8 Age (yrs) Moeller, M.P. (1997). Personal communication , moeller@boystown.org

Tremendous Progress During the Last Decade Less than 30 hospitals with UNHS in 1993; compared with more than 2000 today More than 2 million babies are screened every year prior to discharge 34 states have passed legislation related to newborn hearing screening

The Other Side of the Coin . . . . 2,200 hospitals are not yet screening for hearing loss Almost 2 million babies are NOT screened every year prior to discharge Existing legislation is of variable quality Only 9 states (accounting for 7% of the births) have implemented reasonable statewide programs Follow-up rates are often alarmingly low Some hospitals have unacceptably high referral rates

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening With over half of all babies are screened prior to discharge, has newborn hearing screening become the standard of care? There are hundreds of excellent programs - - - regardless of the type of equipment or protocol used Many programs are still struggling with high refer rates and poor follow-up

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System

Rate Per 1000 of Permanent Childhood Hearing Loss in UNHS Programs Sample Prevalence % of Refers Site Size Per 1000 with Diagnosis Rhode Island (3/93 - 6/94) 16,395 1.71 42% Colorado (1/92 - 12/96) 41,976 2.56 48% New York (1/96 - 12/96) 27,938 1.65 67% Utah (7/93 - 12/94) 4,012 2.99 73% Hawaii (1/96 - 12/96) 9,605 4.15 98%

Tracking "Refers" is a Major Challenge (continued) Initial Rescreen Births Screened Refer Rescreen Refer Rhode Island 53,121 52,659 5,397 4,575 677 (1/93 - 12/96) (99%) (10%) (85%) (1.3%) Hawaii 10,584 9,605 1,204 991 121 (1/96 - 12/96) (91%) (12%) (82%) (1.3%) New York 28,951 27,938 1,953 1,040 245 (1/96-12/96) (96.5%) (7%) (53%) (0.8%)

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss

Audiological Diagnosis Equipment and techniques for diagnosis of hearing loss in infants continues to improve Severe shortages in experienced pediatric audiologists are delaying confirmation of hearing loss Most states are having serious problems linking babies with diagnostic follow-up

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention

Early Intervention Part C of IDEA is an under used resource Services are generally quite good for babies with severe profound bilateral loss, but less adequate for babies with more moderate loss

Key Concepts for Early Intervention Transactional Developmental Family Focused Holistic Transdisciplinary

Communication Choices American Sign Language Total Communication Auditory Verbal Auditory-Oral Cued Speech

Technology Decisions Audiological Evaluation Hearing Aids Cochlear Implant Assistive Devices

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention A Medical Home for all Newborns

What Is a Medical Home? A primary care physician provides care which is: Accessible Family-centered Comprehensive Continuous Coordinated Compassionate Culturally effective

EHDI and the Medical Home Birthing Hospital Audiology Parent Groups Mental Health Primary Provider Child/Family ENT 3rd Party Payers Deaf Community Early Intervention Programs Genetics Services for Hearing Loss

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention A Medical Home for all Newborns Culturally Competent Family Support

What do families want to know when a child is diagnosed with hearing loss…. What do we do next? When must we take action? Where do we get more information? How do we decide? Who will help us? Why do we need early intervention?

Emotions of Families with a Deaf or Hard of Hearing Baby (grief) Reactions to Unexpected Diagnosis (pressure) Urgency of Communication Decisions Search (confusion) Search for Experienced Professionals (isolation) Availability of Services and Support

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention A Medical Home for all Newborns Culturally Competent Family Support Elimination of geographic and financial barriers to service access