Abortion legislation: exploring perspectives of general practitioners and obstetrics and gynaecology clinicians  Anastasia A. Theodosiou, Oliver R. Mitchell  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 197-202 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.011 Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Survey questions, based on relevant sections of the Abortion Act (legislation.gov.uk). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 197-202DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.011) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Survey responses (n = 100); green, yes; red, no; *significant difference between yes and no responses (P < 0.05); yellow, the 24 week limit should be increased. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 197-202DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.011) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of responses based on specialty. Each bar indicates percentage of respondents who answered ‘yes’ to each question. Green, all respondents (n = 100); orange, obstetric and gynaecology clinicians (n = 42); blue, general practitioners (n = 58). * = significant difference between obstetrics and gynaecology and general practitioner responses (P < 0.05). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 197-202DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.011) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of responses based on conscientious objector status. Each bar indicates percentage of respondents who answered ‘yes’ to each question. Green, all respondents (n = 100); orange, non-conscientious objector (n = 78); blue, conscientious objector (n = 22). * = significant difference between conscientioius objector and non-conscientious objector responses (P < 0.05). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 197-202DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.011) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of questionnaire responses with recommendations of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (STC); *The RCOG and the STC did not comment on whether abortion on request should be allowed. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 197-202DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.011) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions