EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Grievances & Appeals CPAC Brown Bag 15 May 2001 Jim Baugh & Steve Rayle.
10/09/01 Overview Purpose of this presentation:
Discipline and Grievance Procedures Aspire Cindy Edwards.
Faculty and EPA Professionals Grievance Procedure Conducting an Effective Grievance Hearing Presented by: The Office of Legal Affairs 2008.
1 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Traditional collective bargaining during the term of the collective agreement Normally carried out through the grievance procedure.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Designing an Internal ADR Program
Sexual Harassment University of Louisiana at Monroe.
EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS Goals of the Employee Grievance Policy: Provide procedural consistency across the agencies and universities of.
Proposed Dispute Process 10/22/13 Time LimitsUnionCompanyHR ArbitrationWithin 20 days of Step Four decision Step Four (Mediation Committee) Meet as soon.
1  Any employee, regardless of occupation, position, or profession may be warned, demoted, or dismissed.  All employees with permanent full-time, permanent.
1  Any employee, regardless of occupation, position, or profession may be warned, demoted, or dismissed.  Applies to Career Status Employees:  Permanent.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
2  Exempt/Non-Exempt  Non-exempt  Exempt Managerial/Policy Making  New Appointment  Probationary—24 months  Trainee--Once training progression is.
Disciplinary Issues Palliative Medicine Registrar
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
Grievance. Some important points from collective agreement Leaves Wages Designated University holidays Hours of work and work assignment.
Annual EEO Update Presentation to USDA ARS-Northern Plains Area October 18, 2012 Presented by John Jones and Steve Oppermann Senior Consultants Rushford.
ADR "Best" Practices Prf Rob Kaplan University. OPTING OUT OF EMPLOYER ADR PROGRAMS: TIMING IS EVERYTHING; Alfred G. Feliu In the employee choice context,
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
1 Federal Sector Discrimination Complaints Process for Individuals Incident/Alleged Discrimination (1) Employee Contacts EO Counselor (Rights & Responsibilities)
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TRAINING USUHS EEO Office Administrative Support Division
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY For MANAGERS/SUPERVISORS MANAGERS/SUPERVISORS Prepared by EEO Officer, WSMR, NM.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
United States Department of Transportation Notification And Federal Employee Anti- Discrimination And Retaliation Act of 2002.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Drake Maynard HR Services, LLC | NEW HEALTH DIRECTOR TRAINING Raleigh | May 2016.
HR Elements for HR Practitioners 1 Lesson 9: Employee Grievances Duration: 30 minutes Employee Grievances Slide 9- 1.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Filing an Academic Grievance
Mason County School District
Sexual Harassment Seminar
UAH Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures
AHCCCS/ALTCS Service Appeal Process Flow Chart
Alleged Incident/Personnel Action
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
CHAPTER 5 PROCESSING & REPORTING COMPLAINTS.
REQUEST MAST.
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
GRIEVANCE POLICY & PROCEDURE
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
REQUEST MAST.
REQUEST MAST.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Federal Sector COMPLAINT ROCESSING
REQUEST MAST.
Washington County Schools Harassment and Grievance Policy
Preparing to Mediate: Serving as a Respondent
Administering Human Rights Legislation
REQUEST MAST.
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
For more information call the EEO Office at
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Employee Grievance Process: Overview and Timeframes
E. Planning and Preparing to Manage a Small Business
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
Presented by: Naji Al-Sulaimani Head of Employee Relations – PCR5
REQUEST MAST.
Minnesota House of Representatives Policy Against Harassment and Discrimination overview of the Policy.
Faculty Grievance & Dispute Resolution Office
Flagler College Student Disability Grievance Procedure
Presentation transcript:

EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS On August 21, 2013, the State Human Resources Act was signed into law that made significant changes to the grievance process. Key among the changes is the creation of a uniform grievance policy for all NC state agencies and universities. The end goal is to ensure that all employees have a fair and equitable means to address workplace disputes arising out of employment regardless of where they work. A new Employee Grievance Policy was written to reflect those changes and approved by the State Human Resources Commission. The policy became effective December 1, 2013 for agencies and will become effective for the university system on May 1, 2014. Goals of the Employee Grievance Policy: • Provide procedural consistency across the agencies and universities of NC State government; • Ensure employees have access to grievance procedures to address grievable issues timely, fairly, and without fear of reprisal; and • Resolve workplace issues efficiently and effectively. Notable Changes and Enhancements: Grievable Issues • Updates the list of issues that are grievable and who may file a grievance. Informal Grievance Process • Creates two informal processes whereby employees and their employer are given the opportunity to resolve workplace disputes before an employee files a formal grievance. - For alleged unlawful discrimination, harassment or retaliation, employees will utilize an Equal Employment Opportunity Informal Inquiry process to attempt to resolve the complaint. - For policy violations (with the exception of dismissal and separation due to unavailability), employees will be given an opportunity to have an Informal Discussion with appropriate personnel that has jurisdiction regarding the alleged event or action to attempt to resolve the dispute. Step 1: Mediation • Provides mediation as the first step of the formal internal grievance process for all grievances. Mediation provides the grievant and an agency respondent an opportunity to openly discuss a grievance in a neutral environment with the goal of reaching a mutually acceptable resolution. Step 2: Hearing • Retains a hearing process as the second step of the formal internal grievance process following an impasse at mediation. The grievant is provided the opportunity to present their grievance orally to a Hearing Officer or Hearing Panel. Following the hearing, the Hearing Officer or Hearing Panel Chair will draft a proposed recommendation for a Final Agency Decision (FAD). Final Agency Decision (FAD) • Reviewed by the Office of State Human Resources Director prior to issuance. The agency head will issue the FAD in writing within 90 calendar days from the initial filing of a grievance. Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) • Retains the opportunity for a grievant to petition for a contested case hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings if not satisfied with the FAD, in cases where the grievable issue may be appealed.