Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Advertisements

Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Curbs Thymic Negative Selection Promoting Regulatory T Cell Development  Weiming Ouyang, Omar Beckett, Qian Ma,
Retinoic acid inhibits Th17 polarization and enhances FoxP3 expression through a Stat-3/Stat-5 independent signaling pathway by Kevin M. Elias, Arian Laurence,
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
NKT Cells Inhibit the Onset of Diabetes by Impairing the Development of Pathogenic T Cells Specific for Pancreatic β Cells  Lucie Beaudoin, Véronique.
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
T Cell-Produced Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Controls T Cell Tolerance and Regulates Th1- and Th17-Cell Differentiation  Ming O. Li, Yisong Y. Wan, Richard.
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
A Mutation in the Nlrp3 Gene Causing Inflammasome Hyperactivation Potentiates Th17 Cell-Dominant Immune Responses  Guangxun Meng, Fuping Zhang, Ivan Fuss,
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Abrogation of TGFβ Signaling in T Cells Leads to Spontaneous T Cell Differentiation and Autoimmune Disease  Leonid Gorelik, Richard A Flavell  Immunity 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg 
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Yunqi Wang, Maureen A. Su, Yisong Y. Wan  Immunity 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Engagement of the Type I Interferon Receptor on Dendritic Cells Inhibits T Helper 17 Cell Development: Role of Intracellular Osteopontin  Mari L. Shinohara,
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
A Key Role of Leptin in the Control of Regulatory T Cell Proliferation
Abrogation of TGFβ Signaling in T Cells Leads to Spontaneous T Cell Differentiation and Autoimmune Disease  Leonid Gorelik, Richard A Flavell  Immunity 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 371-381 (March 2007) Interleukin-2 Signaling via STAT5 Constrains T Helper 17 Cell Generation  Arian Laurence, Cristina M. Tato, Todd S. Davidson, Yuka Kanno, Zhi Chen, Zhengju Yao, Rebecca B. Blank, Françoise Meylan, Richard Siegel, Lothar Hennighausen, Ethan M. Shevach, John J. O'Shea  Immunity  Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 371-381 (March 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 IL-2 Restricts In Vitro Generation of IL-17-Secreting CD4+ T Cells (A and B) Sorted naive (CD62L+ CD44− CD25−) CD4+ T cells from wild-type C57Bl6 mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in media alone or under optimal Th17-polarizing conditions for 3 days and analyzed by flow cytometry for the presence of intracellular cytokines. Percentages of CD4+ T cells positive for intracellular IFN-γ or IL-17 are shown after culture in the presence of 0, 10, 50, or 100 iu/ml of exogenous rhIL-2. Shown in (B) are three experiments analyzing both the effect of increasing doses of rhIL-2 as described above and the addition of anti-mouse IL-2 and its rescue with the addition of rhIL-2 at 100 iu/mL. Significant differences were determined by Student's t test and are denoted by a double asterisk (p < 0.01) or by a triple asterisk (p < 0.001). (C and D) CD4+ T cells were cultured as in (A), but in the absence (top rows) or presence (bottom rows) of a blocking antibody for murine IL-2, without (middle columns) or with (right columns) exogenous rhIL-2. Intracellular staining for IFN-γ versus IL-17 (C) or FoxP3 versus IL-17 (D) is shown. Immunity 2007 26, 371-381DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 IL-2 Inhibits IL-17 Production Both In Vitro and In Vivo (A) CD4+ T cells from wild-type or Il2−/− C57Bl6 mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 under Th17 conditions for 3 days in the presence or absence of IL-2, followed by intracellular staining for IFN-γ versus IL-17. The numbers indicate the percentage of CD4+ T cells that express IL-17 and are representative of data from two independent experiments. (B) Serum concentrations of IL-17 were analyzed in Il2−/− (n = 5) and wild-type (n = 5) mice by ELISA. The amounts were significantly different (p = 0.02) as assessed by an unpaired (unequal variance) test and are denoted by a single asterisk (p < 0.05). (C) Mesenteric lymph node cells from wild-type and Il2−/− mice were harvested, stimulated for 4 hr with PMA and ionomycin, fixed, and stained for the presence of IL-17 and the expression of CD4 by flow cytometry. The numbers shown indicate the percentage of total cells and are representative of data from two independent experiments. Immunity 2007 26, 371-381DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 IL-2 Inhibits IL-17 Production in the Absence of Autoimmune Disease (A) CD4+ T cells from Bl10 Rag2−/− TCR transgenic specific for pigeon cytochrome c with or without deletion of the Il2 gene were polyclonally stimulated for 3 days either in media alone (Th0); in the presence of IL-12 and anti IL-4 (Th1 conditions); in the presence of IL-23, anti-IFN-γ, and anti-IL-4; or in the presence of optimal Th17 differentiating conditions. The stimulations were performed in the presence or absence of IL-2 and subsequently stained for IFN-γ and IL-17. The numbers indicate the percentage of CD4+ T cells that express either IL-17 (top left quadrants) or IFN-γ (bottom right quadrants) and are representative of data from two independent experiments. (B) CD4+ T cells from B10.A Rag2−/− 5C.C7 TCR transgenic mice with (top) or without (bottom) deletion of the Il2 gene were injected i.v. into congenic (CD45.1) B10.A mice. The next day mice received s.c. injections of PCC peptide together with CFA. The draining lymph nodes were harvested after 7 days. Cells were stimulated for 4 hr with PMA and ionomycin, fixed and stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry. CD44, IL-17, and IFN-γ expression is shown for the gated CD45.2+ cell population. Representative data from four independent experiments are shown. Immunity 2007 26, 371-381DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Critical Role of STAT3 in the Regulation of IL-17 and RORγt (A) CD4+ T cells from Stat3fl/fl; MMTV-Cre mice or littermate control mice were polyclonally stimulated for 3 days in media alone or under optimal Th17 conditions. The cells were subsequently analyzed for intracellular levels of FoxP3 and IL-17 by flow cytometry. The percentages indicated are representative of data from three independent experiments. (B) CD4+ T cells from Stat3fl/fl and Stat3fl/fl; MMTV-Cre mice polyclonally stimulated and expanded in IL-2-containing media were rested in media without cytokine for 6 hr followed by a 5 min stimulation with IL-6 at 10 ng/mL. Cells were subsequently lysed and immunoblotted for the expression of phospho-tyrosine STAT3, pan STAT3, and actin. (C) CD4+ T cells from Stat3fl/fl mice (white bars) or Stat3fl/fl; MMTV-Cre mice (black bars) were polyclonally stimulated for 3 days in media alone (Th0); in the presence of IL-12 and anti IL-4 (Th1 conditions); in the presence of TGF-β1; or in the presence of optimal Th17 differentiating conditions. Cell lysates were analyzed for the presence of RORγt mRNA by quantitative PCR, and values are normalized to the expression level in wild-type T cells polarized under Th0 conditions. Histograms represent mean values and error bars represent SD values. The data shown are duplicates and are representative of two independent experiments. (D) CD4+ T cells from C57Bl6 mice were polyclonally stimulated for 3 days in media alone (Th0); in the presence of IL-12 and anti IL-4 (Th1 conditions); in the presence of TGF-β1; or in the presence of optimal Th17 differentiating conditions all in the presence of anti-mouse IL-2 with (white bars) or without (black bars) the addition of 100 iu/mL rhIL-2. Cell lysates were analyzed for the presence of RORγt mRNA by quantitative PCR, and values are normalized to the expression level in wild-type T cells polarized under Th0 conditions. Histograms represent mean values and error bars represent SD values. The data shown are duplicates and are representative of two independent experiments. Immunity 2007 26, 371-381DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 STAT5 Negatively Regulates Th17 Differentiation In Vitro and In Vivo (A) CD4+ T cells from Stat5a/bfl/fl or Stat5a/bfl/fl; CD4-Cre mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 for 3 days in IL-2 alone or IL-2 together with either IL-23, anti-IFN-γ, and anti-IL-4; or under optimal Th17 conditions, and cells were subsequently stained for IFN-γ and IL-17. Representative data from two independent experiments are shown. (B) CD4+ T cells from Stat5a/bfl/fl mice (white bars) or Stat5a/bfl/fl; CD4-Cre mice (black bars) were activated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, prior to measuring levels of IL-17 protein in culture supernatants by ELISA at 24, 48, and 72 hr. Histograms represent mean values and error bars represent SD values. The three asterisks denote a significant difference (p < 0.001) as determined by an unpaired t test. The values shown were measured in triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments. (C) Serum levels of IL-17 detected in wild-type (n = 5) and Stat5a/bfl/fl; CD4-Cre (n = 5) mice. The asterisk denotes a significant difference (p = 0.013) as determined by an unpaired t test. Immunity 2007 26, 371-381DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Inhibition of Th17 Differentiation by IL-2 Requires STAT5 (A) CD4+ SP thymocytes from Stat5a/bfl/fl or Stat5a/bfl/fl; CD4-Cre mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 for 3 days in media alone (Th0 conditions); together with IL-23, anti-IFN-γ, and anti-IL-4; or under optimal Th17 conditions with and without the addition of 100 iu/ml IL-2. Cells were fixed and stained for IL-17 and IFN-γ expression. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Percentage of CD4+ T cells that expressed IL-17 was assessed by Student's t test from three independent experiments with in vitro culture conditions as described in (A). Histograms represent mean values from Stat5a/bfl/fl (white bars) or Stat5a/bfl/fl; CD4-Cre (black bars) CD4+ SP thymocytes, and error bars represent SD values. Significantly different levels p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 are denoted with a single or double asterisk, respectively. (C) CD4+ T cells from C57Bl6 mice were polyclonally stimulated under neutral conditions for 3 days, rested in cytokine-free media (black bars), or stimulated with IL-2 (white bars). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated either with anti-STAT 5 or normal rabbit serum (NRS). Bound DNA was analyzed by quantitative PCR with Il17a promoter site-specific primers to region D. Histograms represent mean values and error bars represent SD values. The double asterisk denotes significant difference (p < 0.01) as determined by an unpaired t test. The values were measured in triplicate and are representative of three independent experiments. Immunity 2007 26, 371-381DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.02.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions