ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 477 Design Review Team 6  Spring 2010 Shao-Fu ShihSteve AndersonMike Goldfarb Josh Smith.
Advertisements

College of Engineering ECE Curriculum Enhancements: Senior Design Experiences Professor David G. Meyer School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Automatic Home Medication Dispenser Project # P07009 Team Guide - Dr. Daniel Phillips Project Sponsor - Dr. Michel Berg Team Members Alan StrandburgChris.
ASPPRATECH.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Spring 2005 Omar Shaikh - Nathan Smith - Jeff Huston - Ryan Koors.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
Ryan McLean John-Michael Mulesa Joe Perrin Zach Schoenberger Formal Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 14  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
ECE Grande ECE 477 Design Review Team 3 - Fall 2008.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 16 − Spring 2013 Scott Stack Neil Kumar Jon Roose John Hubberts.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Spring 2005.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Fall 2005 Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich Steven Kady.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 14  Spring 2005 BENNY PARICHEY RAKESH ANUBHAV.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2005 ChadJeffMel Maruf.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 6  Spring 2005 Mike Lowe Eric SuJohn Parlindungan KamBiu Chan.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 14  Spring 2006 Jason, Nathanael, David, David.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 21 - Spring 2013 Team Members: Duncan Swartz, Jacqueline Greer, Tom Pansino, Mark Tubergen.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 3  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Senior Design Group 05  Fall 2004 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here..
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005 Jer-Wei Lam (Sean) Jacinto Chang Ming Sum Wong Kevin Muthuri Team Lead Web:
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2014 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW FEST – FALL OUTLINE  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2004 Jeff Killen Brandon Ade Drew Whipple Matt Compton.
Colin Graber Jason Kohl Jacob Varnau Cameron Young ECE 477 Design Review Team 2 - Spring 2015 R.I.S.K.
1 © 2008 RoboRubik ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 11 – Spring 2008 Tyler Heck Dave Bukiet Erik Carron Casey Kloiber.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 3  Fall 2012 Daniel Carolyn Jonathan Mihir Stein McMican Kuntzman Shah.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Fall 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Mid-Semester Presentation Senior Design II.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4 Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2009 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 22  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
<Add team picture or relevant project picture here>
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 04  Spring 2010
Green Energy Management Systems (G.E.M.S)
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 8 Spring 2013
ECE 477 Design Review Team 21 - Spring 2013
ECE 477 Design Review Team 6 - Spring 2012
ECE 477 Design Review Group 6  Fall 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
ECE 477 Digital Systems Senior Design Project
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Fall 2011
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
ECE 477 Design Review Team 14  Spring 2012
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 2 Spring 2012
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 10  Spring 2008
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2006
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2008
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Spring 2005
ECE 477 Design Review Team ??  Fall 2012
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 15  Spring 2010
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING 2010
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2011
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.

Outline Project overview Block diagram Professional components Design components Success criteria demonstrations Individual contributions Project summary Questions / discussion

Project Overview “The Pill Pusher” Home Appliance Device will dispense a preprogrammed number of pills based on a time schedule. Pill information and delivery times are programmed to device via a serial connection to a PC. Buzzer sounds upon dispensing pills. Alert will cease when a button is pressed. Home Appliance Fits on your countertop and takes up as much space as a coffee maker Simple to use for the elderly

Block Diagram-Original Serial interface Microcontroller Dispenser LCD Display PC Modem Audio System Scroll Buttons

Block Diagram-Revised

Professional Components Constraint analysis and component selection rationale Patent liability analysis Reliability and safety analysis Ethical and environmental impact analysis

Constraint Analysis Computational Requirements-Microcontroller Store information about pills in banks Keep track of time Activate delivery system and alert the user Interface Requirements LCD display Store information using serial connection to PC Power Supply Constraints Power supply is 5 V DC Maximum current is 5.1 mA

Constraint Analysis Packaging Constraints Cost Constraints Contains 4 pill banks, LCD display and PCB Portability is not a concern Cost Constraints A device that is cheaper than similar products Component Selection Microcontroller (PIC18F4539) Stepper Motors vs. Servo Motors

Patent Liability Analysis Main Focus How would the pills be dispensed? What happens if the pills are an oblong shape? Patent One “Programmable automatic pill dispenser” Preload the necessary pills for that day in a compartment The whole canister is dispensed Patent Two “Remotely programmable medication dispensing system” Most similar to ours Pre-package pills for that day in bags Uses a barcode to identify when pills should be dropped

Patent Liability Analysis Literal Infringement “The Pill Pusher” vs. Patent Two No infringement found based on the way pills are dispensed Infringement Under Doctrine of Equivalents “The Pill Pusher” vs. Patent One No infringement-very different

Reliability/Safety Analysis

Ethical/Environmental Analysis

Design Components Packaging design considerations Schematic design considerations PCB layout design considerations Software design considerations

Packaging Design Package is constructed using acrylic Can withstand high pressure Machine shop has equipment to cut/bend Internal operation can be observed Box-like design with slanted face for LCD screen and controls Lockable top lid allows access to magazines

Packaging Design 2D schematic

Packaging Design Lid Enclosure

Packaging Design 3D schematic

Packaging Design Pill Banks Strips of acrylic sheets, glued together to form banks. Universal mounting base plate. Actuator pushes pills out front of bank.

Schematic Design

Schematic/Theory of Operation Power Block

Schematic/Theory of Operation Microcontroller

Schematic/Theory of Operation Motor Control

Schematic/Theory of Operation Switch Input

PCB Layout Design

Software Design

Success Criteria Demonstrations To send/receive prescription information and times to/from a PC via serial interface- demo To control dispensing system with microcontroller generated interrupts- demo To display pertinent information for status/user control on LCD screen - demo To provide audible signal to user for specific events - demo To store prescription data in memory and access it based on a time schedule.- demo

Individual Contributions Team Leader – Jonathan Benetti Team Member 2 – Andy Mehl Team Member 3 – Adam McNeal Team Member 4 – Ben Romberger

Team Leader – Jonathan Benetti

Member 2 – Andy Mehl

Member 3 – Adam McNeal

Member 4 – Ben Romberger

Project Summary Important lessons learned

Project Summary Second iteration enhancements

Questions / Discussion