Median time to internationalisation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VALIDATION OF COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY Matt Safi Product manager.
Advertisements

Single-Patient Use of Investigational Drugs and Biologic Products for Treating Cancer Grant Williams, M.D. Medical Team Leader DODP/CDER/FDA.
 Many countries have a ‘monopsony’ where there is one powerful purchaser; the government  Goverments have focused on pharmaceutical companies as easy.
ICH Harmonization Eric W. Lewis, MD GlaxoSmithKline October 3 rd, 2002 The Basis of Global Drug Development.
The Global Generic Medications Market
Professor Stuart Walker BSc PhD MFPM FIBiol FRSC FRCPath FIstD Director CMR International UK.
Industry Trends and Tools for Generic Product Selection KATE KUHRT SHANGHAI JUNE 19-21, 2007.
1 Global New Employee Orientation Workshop Welcome.
Biopharmaceutical Regulatory Requirements 40. Marketing Authorization for New Chemical Entities Health Canada’s (HC) Therapeutic Products Directorate.
Stages of drug development
Unlicensed Medicines in Paediatrics Is there a problem ? Scottish Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacist Group National Paediatric Pre- Registration Pharmacist.
Investigating recent developments in clinical trials in Belgium: analysis of the data available at the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products.
1 Value Assessment of Development-Stage Assets Pharmaceutical Products, Medical Devices, and Related Intellectual Property Frank S. Castellana, M.D., Eng.Sc.D.
INTRODUCTION TO RA.
1 Integration of Standards, Business and International Trade Operating Within a Complex Global Standards Environment for Medical Products Presented by.
World Intellectual Property Organization DCPPS 1 presented by Mr. Vladimir Yossifov WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Selection of comparators Compiled by Jan Welink WHO Workshop.
Protection of Intellectual Property in Canada George Jackowski, Ph.D., KCTJ October 19 th, 2015 Chairman of NAVA Corp.
VOLT01 Reformulated Zoledronic Acid Targeted to be the first Disease- Modifying Drug in Osteoarthritis.
GMP- A Regulatory Perspective. Regulatory Perspective in entering Global Pharma Markets.
1 PRIORITY MEDICINES FOR EUROPE AND THE WORLD Barriers to Pharmaceutical Innovation Richard Laing EDM/PAR WHO.
The association between European Medicines Agency approval and Health Technology Assessment recommendations Iga Lipska 1,2, Anke Hövels 2, Neil McAuslane.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Aspects of pharmacovigilance: Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs)
Compassionate use programs and the European regulatory system Filip Josephson M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Assessor.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization An Industry Perspective Adrian Griffin | April 2016.
CONFIDENTIAL 0 0 Paul Stoffels, M.D. Chief Scientific Officer Worldwide Chairman, Pharmaceuticals.
IDMP Overview December 2015.
Success Stories of Globalization in Korean Pharma
Regulatory Updates Health Sciences Authority Singapore
Paediatric Medicine: The Paediatric Investigation Plan
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
Quality of the medicinal products. Drug switching.
Integration of Standards, Business and International Trade Operating Within a Complex Global Standards Environment for Medical Products Presented by.
International Retirement Savings Plan
EudraVigilance.
Figure 3. BLA and NME Drugs Sponsored by US companies ( )
The percentage of NASs approved by CDER
Comparing the registration to reimbursement pathway for new active substances in Europe Germany Poland To help provide a better understanding of the European.
NASs approval time by therapeutic area:
Median 25th and 75th percentile
Anti-therapeutic antibodies Creative Biolabs is a pioneer and undisputed global leader in the rapidly emerging market for therapeutic antibodies. We offer.
Anti-therapeutic antibodies Creative Biolabs is a pioneer and undisputed global leader in the rapidly emerging market for therapeutic antibodies. We offer.
New economies: Scenarios with a likelihood >50% and impact
Median approval time for new active substances approved by ICH agencies by approval year Methodology For each new active substance (NAS) approved between.
Comparing HTA recommendations
Median Box : 25th and 75th percentiles
Speeding access to therapies
Percentage Key Message
Median submission gap, median approval time and percentage approved as expedited for new active substances (NASs) approved by six authorities:
This study was conducted using the CIRS EMaRReT database, which tracks new medicines and line extensions in 15 Emerging Markets (Argentina, Brazil, Mexico,
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
New active substance median approval time for six regulatory authorities in Key messages The last decade, , saw a continuation.
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
New active substances approved by EMA and FDA over 10 years
EMA: The European Medicines Agency
Comparing the registration to reimbursement pathway for new active substances in Europe Germany Poland To help provide a better understanding of the European.
Rollout time breakdown: 24 common NASs in 7 jurisdictions
INTERNATIONALISATION – FOCUS ON EMA AND FDA
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
Croatia, Zagreb, September 4, 2018 Ljiljana Sović Brkičić
Median, Box : 25th and 75th percentiles
Assessment routes and timelines in Australia (2011)
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
Pharmaceuticals Industry
Out of the 52 NASs approved by all six authorities during :
Median times to submission and licensing for 70 new active substances approved in five markets from 1997 to 2010 Note: EMA approval.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Assessment routes and timelines
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
Global Specialty Pharmaceuticals Market. Report Description and Highlights According to Renub Research report "Specialty Pharmaceuticals Market, by Country.
Presentation transcript:

Median time to internationalisation Median time to internationalisation* for new active substances first launched 2005-2010 Introduction Every marketed medicine undergoes a rigorous evaluation from a regulatory agency to ensure that the benefits of the medicine outweigh the risks and as such can become a valuable asset in the treatment of diseases. The development of new medicines is time consuming, expensive and risky, with only around 10% of new active substances (NASs) tested in man making it to its first market. Today, companies are interested in the integration of worldwide drug development and global registration is the goal of most pharmaceutical companies, in order to make their products available to patients globally in a timely, ideally simultaneous fashion. However, this can be impeded by a number of factors both company driven and those that relate to the needs of countries Methodology This analysis investigates the NASs first launched (available for sale, in any market) between 2005-2010. For this cohort of medicines, we reviewed their regulatory approval status as of 31 December 2012 in six mature markets (USA, Europe, Japan, Canada, Switzerland and Australia) to identified the level of internationalisation* of the medicine. Time to internationalisation was calculated as “Time from the first submission for market authorisation to the date of licence by the fourth target jurisdiction in the study.” Results One hundred forty-six NASs were identified that were first launched between 2005-2010. Seventy-nine out of 146 first-launched NASs were identified as “international medicines.” When categorised by therapeutic area, the greatest number of products to roll out internationally were anti-cancer products (30%). Approximately two thirds of the internationalised NASs were developed by top companies. Median time for NASs from submission to first market to being approved in the fourth target market are displayed by therapeutic area and company size. It took approximately 600 days (median time) longer for non-top companies to roll their products out internationally, compared with top companies. *International medicine: An NAS that has been granted market authorisation by US FDA, European EMA, and at least two other target jurisdictions (Japan, Canada, Switzerland or Australia). Median time (days) *International medicine: An NAS that has been granted market authorisation by US FDA, European EMA, and at least two other target jurisdictions (Japan, Canada, Switzerland or Australia). Time to internationalisation: Time from the first submission for market authorisation to the date of licence by the fourth target jurisdiction in the study. Source: CIRS R&D 53: Availability of new medicines