Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ramesh Gupta, BNL D1 Dipole Design / IR Magnet Study LARP Collaboration Meeting, Oct 5-6, D1 Dipole Design Task (terminated in 2005) IR Magnet Study.
Advertisements

24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Overview of Possible LHC IR Upgrade Layouts CARE HHH-2004 Workshop CERN 8-11 November 2004 J. Strait, N.V. Mokhov, T. Sen Fermilab bnl - fnal - lbnl -
R. Ostojic, WAMSDO, 19 May 2008 LHC Insertion Region Upgrade Phase I 1.Upgrade goals and milestones 2.Review of IR systems: main findings 3.The emerging.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Loss problems associated with the acceleration of radioactive beams and what we can do about it A.Jansson f fermilab Loss issues (and ideas for solutions)
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Tertiary Collimators in IP1/IP5 LARP Collaboration Meeting Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 5-6, 2005 Fermilab LARP Collaboration Nikolai Mokhov,
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
Thursday Summary of Working Group I Initial questions I: LHC LUMI 2005; ; ArcidossoOliver Brüning 1.
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
Joint IR Studies: Operating Margins Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program LARP Collaboration Meeting SLAC.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
Protecting Superconducting Magnets from Radiation at Hadron Colliders Accelerator Magnet Technology CARE Workshop on Beam Generated Heat Deposition and.
4/27/06 1 US LHC ACCELERATOR RESEARCH PROGRAM brookhaven - fermilab – berkeley - slac US LARP Inner Triplet Cryogenics and Heat Transfer LARP Collaboration.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
BOOSTER COLLIMATION AND SHIELDING Proton Source Workshop Fermilab December 7-8, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
IR Magnets for Muon Collider Alexander Zlobin and Vadim Kashikhin Muon Collider Physics Workshop, Fermilab November 12, 2009.
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
Dark Current and Radiation Shielding Studies for the ILC Main Linac
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
On behalf of the FLUKA team
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Q0 magnet, cooling, support ideas
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Collimation for beta-beams
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Wednesday Summary of Working Group I
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
US-LARP Progress on IR Upgrades
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Machine-Detector Interface
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Muon Collider SR and IR Magnets
Tertiary Collimators in IP1/IP5: Progress Report
Thursday Summary of Working Group I
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Possible Quadrupole-first Options with beta* <= 0.25 m
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
Review of Quench Limits
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Presentation transcript:

Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets LHC SC Magnet Design Studies Fermilab Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab WAMDO Workshop on Accelerator Magnet Design and Optimization CERN April 3-6, 2006

Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov OUTLINE Quench Limits and Design Constraints Protecting LHC IR from pp-products Upgrading and Extending IR Model LARP Design Study Developments Summary WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov QUENCH LIMITS Tevatron: Based on measurements and analyses by H. Edwards et al (1977-1978), the following energy deposition design limits for the Tevatron SC dipole magnets (4.4 T, I/Ic=0.9, 4.6 K) have been chosen in Tevatron design report (1979): Slow loss (DC) 8 mW/g ( ~2 mW/g w/cryo) Fast loss (1 ms) 1 mJ/g Fast loss (20 ms) 0.5 mJ/g LHC IR quads: 1.6 mW/g (12 mJ/cm3) DC (design goal 0.5 mW/g) Nb3Sn IR quads: ~5 mW/g DC (design goal 1.7 mW/g) WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

LHC IR PROTECTION: DESIGN CONSTRAINTS Use nominal design luminosity of 1034 cm-2 s-1, and 1035 cm-2 s-1 for upgrade scenarios. Geometrical aperture: keep it larger than “n1 = 7” for injection and collision optics, including closed orbit and mechanical tolerances. Quench stability: keep peak power density emax, which can be as much as an order of magnitude larger than the azimuthal average, below the quench limit with a safety margin of a factor of 3. Radiation damage: with the above levels, the estimated lifetime exceeds 7 years even in the hottest spots. Quench limit: tests of porous cable insulation systems and recent calculations concerning the insulation system to be used in the Fermilab-built LHC IR quadrupoles (MQXB) have shown that up to about 1.6 mW/g can be removed while keeping the coil below the magnet quench temperature. 1.2 mW/g was used as a limit in ’90s in these studies. Dynamic heat load: keep it below 10 W/m. Hands-on maintenance: keep residual dose rates on the component outer surfaces below 0.1 mSv/hr. Engineering constraints must always be obeyed. WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

IR1/IR5 INNER TRIPLET PROTECTION 3-mm SS SS 53-mm ID 66-mm OD TASB: SS/Cu 1.2-m long 60-mm ID 120-mm OD Copper 1.8-m long 34-mm ID, 0.5-m OD WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

LHC IR1/IR5 PROTECTION SYSTEM As a result of thorough optimization of the IP1/IP5 layouts and low-b quad design, the system was designed (and built) to protect IR SC magnets against debris generated in the pp-collisions, and magnets and detectors against beam halo and a misbehaved beam coming to the IP. This was based on detailed energy deposition calculations with the MARS code at Fermilab. The system includes a set of absorbers in front of the inner triplet (TAS), inside the triplet aperture and between the low-beta quadrupoles, inside the cryostats, in front of the D2 separation dipole (TAN) and between the outer triplet quads as well as a complex system in IP6 and tertiary TCT collimators for the incoming beam. Their parameters were optimized over the years to provide better protection with engineering constraints in mind. WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

TAS AND LINER OPTIMIZATION Beam screen together with cold bore Chosen: 6.5 mm in Q1 and 3 mm in Q2-Q3 Reduces power density at IP-end of Q1 300 times and dynamic heat load to inner triplet by 185 Watts. 5% of incoming energy punch through 1.8-m copper TAS body WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

TAS AND INNER ABSORBERS WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

POWER DENSITY AND HEAT LOADS emax = 0.45 mW/g. 113.8 W per 4 quads, 20.5 W per four correctors and feedbox: 134.3 W total and about 115 W at 1.9 K. WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

ABSORBED AND RESIDUAL DOSE Annual dose up to 30 MGy in coils. 30-day/1-day residual contact dose up to 45 mSv/hr WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

Residual Dose on Outer Vessel and in SC Coils vs Time WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

PROTECTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AT 1034 As a result of optimization of the protection system, it became possible to meet design constraints for the LHC IR at luminosity of 1034 cm-2 s-1, with emax < 0.45 mW/g, Q < 10 W/m, and lifetime in the hottest spot of about 7 years. Dynamic heat loads at cryo temperatures are about 30 W in each quad (114 W total), 20 W in correctors and feedbox, 2 W in D2 dipole, and 0.5 to 2 W in outer triplet quads. At room temperature, the main players are TAS (184 W), D1 dipole (50 W), and TAN (189 W). Residual dose from several hundred mSv/hr in TAS, TAN and inner absorbers to below 0.1-0.3 mSv/hr on outer vessel. WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

IR AND QUAD MARS MODEL DEVELOPMENTS Convert to a more consistent LHC lattice version 6.5 (layout, dimensions, fields) Realistic beam screen in Q1 Nb3Sn coil design with 80 to 110-mm apertures A possibility for user-friendly variation of quad apertures and internal absorber thickness High-Z materials for liner; low-Z spacers in coils Upgrade of detector & machine-detector interface Extension of the model into arcs (outer triplet, matching section, dispersion suppressor and arcs) Substantial developments of the MARS15 code WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

IP1/IP5 MARS15 Model with TAN, LHCf, ZDC and TOTEM WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

ENERGY DEPOSITION STUDIES FOR LARP IR MAGNETS Mission: Provide full support to superconducting magnet design studies in the area of beam-induced energy deposition effects in the IR quadrupoles and dipoles. 2. Continuously develop simulation tools and IR region models to keep physics modules at state-of-the-art level and geometry and lattice descriptions up-to-date. 3.With engineering constraints in mind, develop and optimize mitigation measures to reduce power density, accumulated dose and dynamic heat loads below the corresponding limits (with a safety margin of a factor of 3 for quench-related peak power density) for the luminosity up to 1035 cm-2 s-1. WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

Open Mid-Plane Dipole-First WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

MARS15 Nb3Sn QUAD MODEL AND RESULTS A lot of work here done by I. Rakhno WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

ED in 90-mm Nb3Sn Quad and Coil ID Dependence At peak, Q2B is above the design goal of 1.7 mW/g Lifetime is about 1.5 years with current materials: need to reduce peak ED and use other materials WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

Energy Spectra in Coils and Thicker Liner WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov High-Z Inner Absorber Dynamic heat load scales with luminosity while peak ED is lower in LARP magnets per pp-collision WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov

Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov SUMMARY Quench levels in the LHC IR quads are well understood, more work is needed on new magnets. All energy deposition issues have been addressed in IR in detailed modeling at nominal & upgrade luminosities. IP1 and IP5 SC magnets are adequately protected with local protection systems, main collimation system in IP3/IP7, IP6 collimators (TCDQ etc), and tertiary collimators TCT. LHC upgrade scenarios are challenging from energy deposition standpoint. Feasibility studies performed both for quad- and dipole-first schemes; simulation results for splitted open-midplane dipole, and thicker inner absorber and high-Z absorbers in quads are quite encouraging. Quench and material beam tests are needed. WAMDO – CERN, Apr. 3-6, 2006 Energy Deposition with MARS - N. Mokhov