Introduction Procedure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sedimentation Test of Soil Texture
Advertisements

1 On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Soil Mechanics - II Practical Portion.
 Soil compaction :  Compaction is the reduction in voids content due to air being forced out of the soil or dissolved in the soil water by mechanical.
Carol Kim, Matthew Jurysta, Kathryn Szramek, David Courard-Hauri; Environmental Science & Policy Program, College of Arts & Sciences Introduction References.
Carbon storage in silvopastoral systems Farm Woodland Forum Annual Meeting 13 June 2013 Matthew Upson and Paul Burgess Centre for Environmental Risk and.
Carbon sequestration in reclaimed soils Andrew Trlica, Sally Brown U. of Washington, College of Forest Resources INTRODUCTION: World soils contain more.
Created by Dr. Michael Pidwirny, Department of Geography, Okanagan University College, BC, CA evaporation Soil and Water Ch 5 Continued.
Concrete Mix Design Technician School
How do we know what our climate was like thousands of years ago?
Precipitation Effects on Tree Ring Width for Ulmus americana L
Modeling Soil Organic Matter Distribution in a Northern Hardwood Forest and Tropical Watershed. Kris Johnson* Fred Scatena* and Yude Pan** *University.
IntroductionIntroduction Land-use change or intensification can influence the dynamics and storage of soil organic matter (SOM) and the extent of carbon.
The influence of extreme meteorological phenomena on soil water regime of lowlands Institute of Hydrology - Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava, Slovak.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION BY HYBRID POPLARS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Dr. Jon D. Johnson Hybrid Poplar Research Program Washington State University - Puyallup.
AIT Case Study 2: Afforestation & Reforestation Project Sudhir Sharma, AIT.
Alan Barraza University of Texas – El Paso. Los Pinos Mountains Southern part of a mountain system that extends northward along the Rio Grande Rift. Uplifted.
Phenotypic Variation: Examining the Seeds of Cedrela odorata Nate and Crystal Natural Selection and Evolution: Phenotypic Variation Module 3 Atlantic Forest,
Comparing Two Means and Two Standard Deviations Module 23.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Date: Objective Background Lab 8 The Atomic Mass of “Boltium”
Development of a Forest Carbon Sequestration Protocol for the State of Georgia J. Siry, P. Bettinger, B. Borders, C. Cieszewski, M. Clutter, B. Izlar,

WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
According to the graph, what particle diameter corresponds to a stream velocity of 10 cm / sec ? About 0.2 cm.
Mass / g Time / min
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
{ PINEMAP INTERNSHIP Summer Session 2015 Manon Legendre & Toby SantaMaria.
Carbon Dynamics in Coarse Woody Debris Pools at the Tapajos National Forest in Brazil Hudson Silva Patrick Crill Michael Keller.
Land-Use Types Depth (cm) Soil pHTotal N (g N/kg soil) Soil Particle Size Density (%)Land-Use Types ClaySiltSand Forest Forest.
Submitted By- Amandeep Singh Roll No
Physical Properties of Soil. Soil Texture What is Soil Texture? It is the proportion of three sizes of soil particles. Which are: Sand (Large) Silt (Medium)
Measuring Ecosystems Ehringer. Worldwide productivity The best current estimate of global net primary productivity is 90 to 120 * 1,000,000,000 tons dry.
Phosphorus in aerosol particles in the Amazon Basin
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Measurement and Calculation
Activity 27 Investigating Boomtown’s Weather
Regression and Correlation
Chapter 2: Measurements and Calculations
Carbon sequestration by Forest and soil
Chapter 8 Linear normal models.
Aweke M. Gelaw1, B. R. Singh1 and R. Lal2
Introduction to Scientific Method
Fig. 2. Leaf area (A), dry (B) and fresh mass (C) in relation to leaf volume in all studied species. The inset in (B) demonstrates the correlation between.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Chapter 8 Linear normal models.
Introduction Breach Gravel Barrier Salt Marsh
Arafat Alkhasha Abdulrasoul Al-Omran Anwar Aly
Calculating Stored Carbon in ‘Our Dear Green Place’
Activity 27 Investigating Boomtown’s Weather
Determining Nursery Life Span Of Populus In Ethiopia
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
Which forest type sequesters higher carbon in biomass – Pinus roxburghii or Quercus glauca Aditya Acharya School of forest sciences, UEF
Unit 6: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 11: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Unit 1 Test Review.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
West Virginia University
Drawing Conclusions.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Methods Measuring Doing Science Mixed Bag
Section 10.2 Comparing Two Means.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
FBE05 – Mathematics and Statistics
Tina Nguyen Vegetation Ecology Summer 2018
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Procedure Our group examined the differences between root biomass at different depths within the forest and the pasture. Roots are an important part of the soil because they store large amounts of carbon. According to the IPCC, 45% of the dry biomass of any plant material is composed of pure carbon. Some scientists hypothesize that tropical pastures can act as important carbon sinks. Procedure We used a post-digger to dig a cylindrical volume, with a diameter of 13cm. We then collected soil samples at intervals of 10cm. We separated the roots from the soil, washed and dried them, and then weighed the roots. We attempted to distinguish different root morphotypes among our samples.

Module 6 – Roots, Biomass, and Carbon Mass SEE-U Brazil 2001

Total Dry Biomass and Carbon* Mass (g/m2) 0-10cm 10-20cm 20-30cm Forest Biomass 226.02 75.34 113.01 Carbon 101.71 33.90 50.85 Pasture 188.35 188.35† N/a 84.76 84.76 † * Carbon mass calculated using carbon sequestration index provided by the International Panel on Climate Change † Based on extrapolated values for dry root biomass

Survey of Root Morphotype Diversity Forest Coarse Fine Pasture Coarse Pasture Fine 0-10 cm 2 types 9 types 1 type 5 types 10-14 cm n/a none (all old) 10-20 cm 7 types (5 old, 2 new) 20-30 (old) 4 types Total types 2 11 1 5

Summary of Data Our graphs illustrate the abundance of coarse and fine roots in the soil of the pasture and the forest. In general, we found more fine roots than coarse roots, and we found the majority of the coarse roots in the first ten centimeters of the soil. In the pasture we were only able to dig to the depth of 14cm because we encountered large rocks that impeded our excavation. Thus, we used the obtained data from the 10-14cm layer of the soil in order to extrapolate the expected biomass of the roots for a 10-20cm layer of soil. Our table shows the calculated values for the expected biomass of the roots per meter squared. Using the IPCC carbon sequestration index, we calculated the approximate amounts of carbon per square meter.

Though we only were able to reach a depth of 14cm in the pasture, our extrapolated value for total biomass from 0-20cm in the pasture was greater than our obtained value for total biomass from 0-20cm in the forest. We estimate that 16.7% more carbon is sequestered in the first 10 cm of forest soil than in the corresponding amount of pasture soil. We found a larger quantity of coarse roots in the forest soil. A greater number of root morphotypes were found in forest soil (13 types) than in pasture soil (6 types). Root morphotype diversity decreased with soil depth.

Conclusions Had we been able to reach further depths in the pasture, we may have had more significant data demonstrating differences between root content of the forest and the pasture. The only conclusive difference we found between our two sample sites was a larger number of coarse roots that extended to greater depths in the forest soil. These coarse roots accounted for the slightly larger amount of dry biomass in the forest sample. Though more carbon is sequestered in forest root systems, well-managed pastures may be useful as carbon sinks where forest conservation is not possible.