Measuring motion in biological vision systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Motion Illusions As Optimal Percepts. What’s Special About Perception? Arguably, visual perception is better optimized by evolution than other cognitive.
Advertisements

Chapter 6 Spatial Vision. The visual system recognizes objects from patterns of light and dark. We will focus on the mechanisms the visual system uses.
Karen Dobkins Development of Motion Processing in Human Infants Karen Dobkins Psychology Department UC San Diego.
Read this article for Friday Oct 21! Trends in Neuroscience (2000) 23, Hint #1: there are at least 3 ways of getting this article Hint #2: none.
Read Lamme (2000) TINS article for Wednesday. Visual Pathways V1 is, of course, not the only visual area (it turns out it’s not even always “primary”)
CH24 in Robotics Handbook Presented by Wen Li Ph.D. student Texas A&M University.
Motion Tracking. Image Processing and Computer Vision: 82 Introduction Finding how objects have moved in an image sequence Movement in space Movement.
How does the visual system represent visual information? How does the visual system represent features of scenes? Vision is analytical - the system breaks.
PSY 5018H: Math Models Hum Behavior, Prof. Paul Schrater, Spring 2004 Vision as Optimal Inference The problem of visual processing can be thought of as.
TESTING MODELS OF SIGNAL INTEGRATION IN MT Valerio Mante, Najib Majaj, Matteo Carandini, J. Anthony Movshon ETH and University of Zurich Howard Hughes.
Visual Cognition I basic processes. What is perception good for? We often receive incomplete information through our senses. Information can be highly.
Visual Cognition I basic processes. What is perception good for? We often receive incomplete information through our senses. Information can be highly.
Computational Architectures in Biological Vision, USC, Spring 2001
Basic Processes in Visual Perception
Laurent Itti: CS599 – Computational Architectures in Biological Vision, USC Lecture 5: Introduction to Vision 2 1 Computational Architectures in.
Another viewpoint: V1 cells are spatial frequency filters
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 26 Review for Exam 2.
Low Level Visual Processing. Information Maximization in the Retina Hypothesis: ganglion cells try to transmit as much information as possible about the.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 10 Spatial Frequency.
1-1 Measuring image motion velocity field “local” motion detectors only measure component of motion perpendicular to moving edge “aperture problem” 2D.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 31 Heading Models.
Lecture 2b Readings: Kandell Schwartz et al Ch 27 Wolfe et al Chs 3 and 4.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 20 Stereo, Motion.
1 Perception, Illusion and VR HNRS 299, Spring 2008 Lecture 8 Seeing Depth.
Visual motion Many slides adapted from S. Seitz, R. Szeliski, M. Pollefeys.
Chapter 8: Perceiving Motion
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 28 Structure from motion.
December 9, 2014Computer Vision Lecture 23: Motion Analysis 1 Now we will talk about… Motion Analysis.
Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque -Kohn & Movshon 지각 심리 전공 박정애.
CS332 Visual Processing Department of Computer Science Wellesley College Binocular Stereo Vision Region-based stereo matching algorithms Properties of.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 21 Motion II.
CS332 Visual Processing Department of Computer Science Wellesley College Analysis of Motion Measuring image motion.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 24 Computing Motion.
1 Motion Analysis using Optical flow CIS601 Longin Jan Latecki Fall 2003 CIS Dept of Temple University.
Motion Illusions As Optimal Percepts. What’s Special About Perception? Visual perception important for survival  Likely optimized by evolution  at least.
Straightness, structure, and shadows. VSS 2001 Edward Adelson David Somers MIT.
1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 6 Seeing Motion.
True FOE Computed FOE Recovering the observer’s rotation Velocity component due to observer’s translation Velocity component due to observer’s rotation.
Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 22 Motion III
Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Lecture 8 Seeing Depth
Week 4 Motion, Depth, Form: Cormack Wolfe Ch 6, 8 Kandell Ch 27, 28 Advanced readings: Werner and Chalupa Chs 49, 54, 57.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 16 Stereopsis.
From cortical anisotropy to failures of 3-D shape constancy Qasim Zaidi Elias H. Cohen State University of New York College of Optometry.
Understanding Psychophysics: Spatial Frequency & Contrast
Optical flow and keypoint tracking Many slides adapted from S. Seitz, R. Szeliski, M. Pollefeys.
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 29 Structure from motion, Heading.
Keith May Advanced Motion.
Bayesian Perception.
From local motion estimates to global ones - physiology:
Phenomenal Coherence of Moving Visual Patterns
Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2016 Lecture 15 Stereopsis
The horizontal and vertical components of a projectile in motion depend upon the initial velocity. True False.
Midterm post mortem I’ve graded about 2/3 of them so far.
2D Motion is just the Beginning
From: Motion processing with two eyes in three dimensions
Measuring motion in biological vision systems
Common Classification Tasks
Visual Cortex   Vision Science Lectures in Ophthalmology Curtis Baker.
Spring 2018 Professor Michael Mozer
Binocular Stereo Vision
Walter J. Scheirer, Samuel E. Anthony, Ken Nakayama & David D. Cox
Computing the velocity field
Spatial Vision (continued)
Orientation tuning: strongest response to one orientation
Yu-Cheng Pei, Steven S. Hsiao, James C. Craig, Sliman J. Bensmaia 
Syed A. Chowdhury, Gregory C. DeAngelis  Neuron 
Measuring image motion
Optical flow and keypoint tracking
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Detection of image intensity changes
Presentation transcript:

Measuring motion in biological vision systems Analysis of Motion Measuring motion in biological vision systems

Two-stage motion measurement motion components  2D image motion Movshon, Adelson, Gizzi & Newsome V1: high % of cells selective for direction of motion (especially in layer that projects to MT) MT: high % of cells selective for direction and speed of motion lesions in MT  behavioral deficits in motion tasks

Testing with sine-wave “plaids” Moving plaid demo: www.georgemather.com Movshon et al. recorded responses of neurons in area MT to moving plaids with different component gratings http://www.georgemather.com

Logic behind the experiments... (1) (2) (3) Component cells measure perpendicular components of motion e.g. selective for vertical features moving right predicted responses: (1) (2) (3) Pattern cells integrate motion components e.g. selective for rightward motion of pattern

Movshon et al. observations:  Cortical area V1: all neurons behaved like component cells  Cortical area MT: layers 4 & 6: component cells layers 2, 3, 5: pattern cells  Perceptually, two components are not integrated if: large difference in spatial frequency large difference in speed components have different stereo disparity Evidence for two-stage motion measurement!

Integrating motion over the image  integration along contours vs. over 2D areas: Nakayama & Silverman true motion perceived motion area features must be close contour features can be far away

Option 2: Smoothness assumption: Compute a velocity field that: is consistent with local measurements of image motion (perpendicular components) has the least amount of variation possible

When is the smoothest velocity field correct? When is it wrong? motion illusions

Computing the smoothest velocity field (Vxi-1, Vyi-1) motion components: Vxiuxi + Vyi uyi = vi (Vxi, Vyi) (Vxi+1, Vyi+1) i-1 i i+1 change in velocity: (Vxi+1- Vxi, Vyi+1- Vyi) Find (Vxi, Vyi) that minimize: Σ(Vxiuxi + Vyiuyi - vi)2 + [(Vxi+1-Vxi)2 + (Vyi+1- Vyi)2] + deviation from image motion measurements variation in velocity field