A Comparison of Radial and Rotational Plaid Speed Judgments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Left Visual Field Advantage in Asynchronous Dual-Stream RSVP Tasks: An Investigation of Potential Neural Mechanisms Andrew Clement & Nestor Matthews.
Advertisements

Emmanuel A Stamatakis Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge School of Psychological.
Attention-Dependent Hemifield Asymmetries When Judging Numerosity Nestor Matthews & Sarah Theobald Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville.
Attentionally Dependent Bilateral Advantage on Numerosity Judgments Jenny Ewing & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville.
Bilateral and Unilateral Orientation Dynamics Nestor Matthews & Kristin M. Reardon Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA.
Bilateral Attentional Advantage in Gabor Detection Nestor Matthews & Jenna Kelly Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA In.
Visual Hemifields and Perceptual Grouping Sarah Theobald & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA The human.
The Time Course of the Oblique Effect in Orientation Sensitivity Nestor Matthews, Jennifer Cox & Alana Rojewski Department of Psychology, Denison University,
By Peter Dang and Kyle Dennison.  Ability to acquire language is a unique and essential human trait  Chomsky’s Universal Grammar The human brain contains.
Hastening Visual Attention with Practice: A Perceptual Learning Study Michael Vawter & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University DiscussionIntroduction.
The Role of Speed Lines in Subtle Motion Judgments Jason Allen & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH USA Purpose:
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 31 Heading Models.
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
Previous research has shown performance asymmetries between right and left hemifields on attention-based tasks with a disadvantage for right visual field.
Age effects on hippocampal functional connectivity during multifeatural encoding Chris Foster 1, Milton Picklesimer 1, Neil Mulligan, Ph.D. 1, and Kelly.
Paradoxical False Memory for Objects After Brain Damage Stephanie M. McTighe 1,2 ; Rosemary A. Cowell 3, Boyer D. Winters 4, Timothy J. Bussey 1,2 and.
Results Introduction Nonconditional Feedback Selectively Eliminates Conflict Adaption Summary Methods 38 participants performed a parity judgment task.
Right Hemifield Deficits in Judging Simultaneity: A Perceptual Learning Study Nestor Matthews 1, Michael Vawter 1, Jenna Kelly 2 Psychology, Denison University.
Trading Noise for Stimulus Duration in Orientation Judgments Kei Kurosawa, Kristen Strong & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University,
# Attentional Volleying Across Visual Quadrants Andrew S. Clement 1,2 & Nestor Matthews 1 1 Department of Psychology, Denison University, 2 Department.
MODELING MST OPTIC FLOW RESPONSES USING RECEPTIVE FIELD SEGMENTAL INTERACTIONS Chen-Ping Yu +, William K. Page*, Roger Gaborski +, and Charles J. Duffy.
In principle, the neural resources that govern attention to the left visual field (LVF) could be independent of those governing attention to the right.
When the brain is prepared to learn: Enhancing human learning using real- time fMRI Y, J. J. a, Hinds, O. b, Ofen, N. a, Thompson, T. W. b, Whitfield-Gabrieli,
Introduction  Conway 1 proposes there are two types of autobiographical event memories (AMs):  Unique, specific events  Repeated, general events  These.
Disrupting face biases in visual attention Anna S. Law, Liverpool John Moores University Stephen R. H. Langton, University of Stirling Introduction Method.
Bilateral Superiority in Detecting Gabor Targets Among Gabor Distracters Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH
Tonal Violations Interact with Lexical Processing: Evidence from Cross-modal Priming Meagan E. Curtis 1 and Jamshed J. Bharucha 2 1 Dept. of Psych. & Brain.
Effect of laterality-specific training on visual learning Jenna Kelly & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH
Laterality-Specific Perceptual Learning on Gabor Detection Nestor Matthews & Jenna Kelly Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville OH
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 32 Biological Heading, Color.
Example trial sequences for visual perspective-taking task
‘Signed and Spoken Thinking‘?
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting 2012 Daniel Mann, Charles Chubb
SPECULAR FLOW AND THE PERCEPTION OF SURFACE REFLECTANCE
Nestor Matthews1, Bruce Luber 2,3, Ning Qian1, Sarah H. Lisanby2,3
Visual Speed Sensitivity in the Drum Corp Color Guard
Emilie Zamarripa & Joseph Latimer| Faculty Mentor: Jarrod Hines
Jenna Kelly1,2 & Nestor Matthews2
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(13):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Colour Discrimination Task
Performance-Related Sustained and Anticipatory Activity in Human Medial Temporal Lobe during Delayed Match-to-Sample Rosanna K. Olsen,1 Elizabeth A. Nichols,1.
This research was funded by the Research Department of the VUB
Survivor Interaction Contrast4,5
The Effects of Musical Mood and Musical Arousal on Visual Attention
Nestor Matthews1, Kristin M. Reardon1&2, & Obiageli Uguru1
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Evidence of Inhibitory Processing During Visual Search
Social context influence emotional language comprehension
MODELING MST OPTIC FLOW RESPONSES
Double Dissociation in Radial & Rotational Motion-Defined Temporal Order Judgments Poster # Leslie Welch1, Nestor Matthews2, Elena Festa1, Kendra.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Department of Psychology University of Washington
Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos  Neuron 
Illusory Jitter Perceived at the Frequency of Alpha Oscillations
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Experimental Design in Functional Neuroimaging
Hastening Orientation Sensitivity
MODELING MST OPTIC FLOW RESPONSES
Daphna Shohamy, Anthony D. Wagner  Neuron 
Perceptual Learning on Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments
Marcus Grueschow, Rafael Polania, Todd A. Hare, Christian C. Ruff 
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Oral Communication in the Psychology of Music
Same - Different Analysis
Fear Conditioning in Humans
Paul E. Dux, Jason Ivanoff, Christopher L. Asplund, René Marois  Neuron 
Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos, Ranulfo Romo  Neuron 
A Comparison of Cues for Auditory Motion Judgments
Judging Peripheral Change: Attentional and Stimulus-Driven Effects
Similarity Breeds Proximity: Pattern Similarity within and across Contexts Is Related to Later Mnemonic Judgments of Temporal Proximity  Youssef Ezzyat,
Presentation transcript:

A Comparison of Radial and Rotational Plaid Speed Judgments Poster # 36.4035 Nestor Matthews1, Leslie Welch2, Allison Murphy1, Megan Puritz1 1Denison University - Department of Psychology; 2Brown University - Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences Introduction Results Discussion The Medial Superior Temporal (MST) region of the primate visual system responds to both radial and rotational motion [1-3]. Despite this shared MST activity, prior studies reveal differences between radial and rotational judgments of random dot stimuli [4-9]. Here, we used plaid stimuli to investigate differences between radial and rotational speed judgments. After pilot data revealed little or no effect for opposite motion directions, we investigated whether combining radial and rotational motion differentially affects radial and rotational speed discrimination. Descriptive Statistics Combining radial and rotational motion impaired radial speed discrimination significantly more than rotational speed discrimination. This differential impairment occurred across signal strengths, and also after controlling for either “masked” and “unmasked” performance levels. The results from our plaid stimuli extend those from prior random-dot studies that also showed distinctions between these MST-mediated (radial versus rotational) motion judgments [4-9]. Future experiments are needed to determine whether the present task effects reflect local speed differences, which can influence radial and rotational speed judgments [10-13]. Interaction at a Given Signal Strength Method Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 17.203 <0.001 0.428 0.978 RT 9.777 0.005 0.298 0.849 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 53.110 <0.001 0.698 ~1 RT 3.805 0.063 0.142 0.464 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 21.370 <0.001 0.482 0.993 RT 12.625 0.002 0.354 0.925 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 13.249 0.001 0.366 0.936 RT 7.333 0.013 0.242 0.737 Participants: 24 Denison University students. Task: Which side (L/R) contained faster radial motion (radial motion task), or faster rotational motion (rotational motion task)? Stimuli: On each trial, a pair of bilaterally presented plaids either rotated, radiated, or both. One plaid moved at the standard speed: 2 octaves per second or 2 revolutions per second, respectively, in radial and rotational trial-blocks. The other moved slower by various amounts. References Interaction at a Given Performance Level (d’) Tanaka & Saito (1989). PMID: 2769351 Duffy & Wurtz (1991a). PMID: 1875243 Duffy & Wurtz (1991b). PMID: 1875244 Geesaman & Qian (1996). PMID: 8944287 Bex & Makous (1997). PMID: 9425552 Bex et al., (1998). PMID: 9536513 Geesaman & Qian (1998). PMID: 9666990 Shirai et al., (2006). PMID: 17138275 Xiao et al., (2006). PMID: 16597350 Werkhoven et al., (1993). PMID: 8474842 Barraza & Grzywacz (2002). PMID: 12367744 Barraza & Grzywacz (2003). PMID: 12868642 Barraza & Grzywacz (2005). PMID: 16023697 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 29.077b 0.000 0.558 0.999 RT 6.868b 0.015 0.23 0.709 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 14.097b 0.001 0.38 0.949 RT 2.974b 0.098 0.115 0.379 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 48.944b <0.001 0.68 ~1 RT 36.200b 0.611 Task-by-Stimulus Interaction   F(1,23) p pEta^2 Power d' 25.889b <0.001 0.53 0.998 RT 11.311b 0.003 0.33 0.896 Poster: http://personal.denison.edu/~matthewsn/vss2016matthewsetal