Authors: team red - Hannes Schreier, Tobias Kipp, Dr. Bodo Schwieger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG) © Prof. K. Zografos STEPs STEPs Scenarios for the.
Advertisements

1 Effects of a dialogue marketing campaign on new citizens daily mobility Reyhaneh Farrokhikhiavi, M.A. ISB, RWTH Aachen University European Conference.
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
Mobility in Munich Tasks & Challenges Third AENEAS Training Workshop March 4th 2010 Florian Paul Munich Transit Ltd. (MVG) Strategy and Planning.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Welcome to CIVITAS.
> A new vision of transport TECHNOLOGYMULTI-APPLICATIONSECONOMICSLICENSINGCNAIMPLEMENTATION GENERAL Designed and promoted by public transport operators.
An integrated mobility plan for the Cracow University of Technology Katarzyna Nosal Cracow University of Technology.
ICT cloud-based platform and mobility services available, universal and safe for all users General presentation
Sustainable Transport Management at Local Level: The ARCHIMEDES Project Mette Skamris Holm, City of Aalborg Coordinator ARCHIMEDES The Single Market Act.
WEBINAR Provisions for cyclists 06/06/2012 Marius Homocianu, City of Iasi.
Promoting Sustainability through Mobility Management Concepts, Belgian Experience Bart Desmedt General manager Traject.
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Slide 1 WP D Integrating Mobility Management and Land Use Planning How can Mobility Management be included in the planning and building permission process.
© Trivector 1 GREEN CITIZENS OF EUROPE -4,5 YEARS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MM IN UMEÅ, SWEDEN ECOMM 2015, Utrecht Emma Ödling, Umeå municipality,
Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities 16 April 2013 Geneva Marjan Frederix, Mobiel 21, CIVITAS Vanguard.
Embedding Travel Planning in the Development Process Sarah Cummings Behaviour Change Transport for London.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
TRACECA TRAINING Experience Eng. Cristina AMARAZEANU Head Office of Planning and Strategy Department Bucharest, Romania 23 rd of November 2011.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
CIVITAS PLUS Skopje sustainable transport measures MIRJANA APOSTOLOVA, City of Skopje Skopje, 17 September 2012.
Commercial Transport Senate Department for Urban Development Principle Affairs of Transport Policy Julius Menge, VII A W, Commercial Transport Berlin’s.
Study on the mobility needs of elderly people for the European Metropolitan Transport Authorities Meeting with the EMTA working group on accessibility.
By: Arun Nadar Gururaj Rajni Roushelle Marta Mehtab.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Almada, 26 th March 2009 Parking Policy Graz.
DR. BRENNER INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT MBH 1 Consulting Engineers for Transport and Traffic Consulting – Planning – Design – Engineering – Research - Coordination.
Car sharing services Another tool for sustainable mobility in urban areas Trieste, 16 th March 2015 Antonio Privitera Senior Consultant at Lem.
DEMOCRITOS DEveloping the MObility CRedits Integrated platform enabling travellers TO improve urban transport Sustainability Grant agreement no
Marko Matulin University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 21 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN Measure 4.4: Mobility management for.
The reasons to use flexible car sharing are varied.
CIVITAS PLUS Testing Innovative Strategies for Clean Urban Transport, examples from Skopje, MIRJANA APOSTOLOVA, City of Skopje Regional Public Transport.
IEE/12/041/SI – Ele.C.Tra. 01 July 2013 – 31 December 2015 September 2013 Electric City Transport Ele.C.Tra Contract N°: IEE/12/041/SI
SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLANNING IN EMERGING CITIES: THE EXAMPLE OF GDYNIA dr Marcin Wolek Department of Transportation Market University of Gdansk.
WEBINAR Provisions for cyclists, Expanding the Cycling Horizon 06/06/2012 Anne Marie Lautrup, City of Aalborg.
Armadale CFC Survey Results. Questions for 2015 Survey for new leisure facilities in Armadale 1.Have you heard of Armadale Community Football Club? 2.Do.
Team red Deutschland GmbH Mobility Management with tight budget – the Osnabrueck example.
Public Transport combined with Car Sharing – a better alternative Annette Kayser Project Manager, M.Sc. City of Copenhagen.
Mobility-as-a-Service
Summary Transport Strand
Shadi Sadeghian, Ph.D. Eco-mobility Program – VEDECOM Institute
ECOMM 2017 Maastricht Elisabeth Raser (BOKU),
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Holger Haubold, ECF Fiscal Policy Officer Brussels, 20 February 2017
The impacts of motorization and what can be done to mitigate them
Tackling urban congestion with create project
Joint Workshop Mobility-as-a-Service Implementing New Mobility Schemes: Impact on Business, Operations & Regulation May 3, 2017, Brussels Andreas Hoedl.
Presented by YOUSSOU LO PROJECT NATIONAL COORDINATOR
Shaping the CREATE ‘Guidelines’ Workshop preparation
Expert presentation by:
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Testing Innovative Strategies for Clean Urban Transport: CIVITAS Plus
PEDELEC CORRIDOR BERLIN SOUTHWEST DR JOHANNES THEISSEN
The Buffalo Empire State Poverty Reduction Initiative (ESPRI)
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE IMPACTS ON ACCESSIBILITY FOR SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN BLOEMFONTEIN NDAKHONA BASHINGI Southern African.
Bikesharing schemes under development – from city to region Dr
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
MEASURING INDIVIDUALS’ TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR BY USE OF A GPS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION IN DAR ES SALAAM CITY 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference.
Contribution to sustainable development Caroline Beglinger
MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF A KILOMETRIC ALLOWANCE FOR CYCLING COMMUTERS
Long term strategy and structure
02/05/2018 Providing a real alternative to car ownership Convenient | Cost Effective | Sustainable.
CityMobilNet.
Modernising the Swedish National Travel Survey to be launched in RVU Sverige Luxembourg
Partnering with Cities
ABC Ramps Transportation Options Implementation Plan
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Territorial impact assessment
Katia Kishchenko, City of Antwerp
A very warm welcome to this presentation on how to reduce car parking spaces and costs using efficient parkering strategies and mobility management measures.
Presentation transcript:

Authors: team red - Hannes Schreier, Tobias Kipp, Dr. Bodo Schwieger Impact of different car-sharing schemes on traffic generation and parking in Munich Authors: team red - Hannes Schreier, Tobias Kipp, Dr. Bodo Schwieger

Car-Sharing schemes in Munich “Traditional” Parking zone based Free floating

Differences between car-sharing schemes v

Impact of traditional car-sharing schemes

Parking zones in Munich

What are the effects of the “new” car-sharing schemes? On traffic generation? On modal split? On parking demand?

Questions for the Munich car-sharing strategy Should we support the new car-sharing schemes? Should we offer more dedicated parking for the new car-sharing schemes? Where should the dedicated parking spots be located? Can we reduce the number of parking spaces in the city?

The City of Munich wanted to find out… … and was clever enough to put the obligation to participate in the evaluation in the contracts with all new car-sharing providers!

EVA-CS – The evaluation of new car-sharing services Evaluation between 2013 and 2015 Evaluated services FreeFloating: DriveNow and car2go Parking-Area based services: Flinkster and CiteeCar Project Partners

Survey Design – The evaluation included Customer surveys: approx. 1.600 participants Survey on Munich citizens: approx. 1.000 participants Analysis on Back-End-Data: approx. 400.000 Trips Focus groups and expert interviews

Provider No. Of cars No. Of users 153 8.500 144 1.262 300 15.759 592 46.368 Total 1.189 71.889

Who uses the “new” car-sharing schemes? Category Specifics Age  25 - 35 Years  55+ Years Gender Approx. 75% male Phase of live  Couples <40 Years, working, no kids  Non-workers (esp. 65+) Income Above-Average incomes

How many kms are generated / reduced? km driven before the new car-sharing schemes were used 829 Mio. Additional km with the new car-sharing schemes 11 Mio. Reduced km by abandoned cars due to the new car-sharing schemes 52 Mio. Overall reduction of car km 41 Mio.

How many private cars do they substitute? Zone-Based OneWay Total

Approx. 1.500 parking spaces gained How many private cars are already substituted? Approx. 850 car-sharing-Cars substitude Approx. 2.500 private owned cars Approx. 1.500 parking spaces gained

Conclusion: Effects on the urban mobility system Positive effects on private car ownership and parking space demand? Should the city take action to encourage a broader use of new-car-sharing schemes?

10 X Conclusion II: Effects on the city of Munich 1.500 Parking spaces X 20qm = 60.000 sqm = 10 soccer fields

Future development New car-sharing schemes will be extended Will the city of Munich use parking space in a different way?

Demand for further research Which transport modes do the new car-sharing schemes substitute? Are the effects the same in other cities?

Contact Thank you for listening! Tobias Kipp +49 8105 779920 +49 171 4262971 e-Mail: tobias.kipp@team-red.net www.team-red.net team red Deutschland GmbH Geschäftsführer Dr. Bodo Schwieger Almstadtstr. 7, 10119 Berlin Tel: +49.(0)30.138 986-35 – Fax: +49.(0)30.138 986-36