DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Advertisements

1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning HW: Lesson 2.4/ 1 – 10, 13.
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
Logos Formal Logic.
Deduction CIS308 Dr Harry Erwin. Syllogism A syllogism consists of three parts: the major premise, the minor premise, and the conclusion. In Aristotle,
Basic Argumentation.
Inductive Reasoning, Deductive Reasoning, and False Premise.
Inductive & Deductive Reasoning
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Warm Up 1. How do I know the following must be false? Points P, Q, and R are coplanar. They lie on plane m. They also lie on another plane, plane n. 2.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING SYLLOGISM FALSE PREMISE INDUCTIVE REASONING.
Logic in Everyday Life.
 Find your new seat.  Belonzi, Alison – (1,2)  Benjamin, Jeremy – (1,3)  Falkowski, Taylor – (1,4)  Kapp, Timi – (2,1)  Lebak, Allyson – (2,2) 
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
#tbt #4 Who Owns The Zebra?
IT’S EOC TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!! FOCUS UP!! BUCKLE DOWN!! TRY NOT TO BE ABSENT!! WORK HARD! GET REST! This is a marathon… not a sprint… You after EOC.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
Deductive and induction reasoning
It’s All About Logic! Building Mathematics Understanding into Career & Technical Education.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
p qp q q pq p p  q ~p  ~q ~q  ~p q p September 17, 2014.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Use of Reason and Logic RATIONALISM.  A Rationalist approach to knowledge is based on the belief that we can ascertain truth by thinking and reflection.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
Logic Part 2 A Mr. C Production.
Valid and Invalid Arguments
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
MAT 142 Lecture Video Series
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
Philosophy of Research by Zain Ullah Khattak
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive Arguments: Checking for Validity
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Introduction to Logic start a new RAW Book entry (#7)
10/9 Objective: Identify deductive reasoning in forensic cases.
Logical Fallacies.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.
Syllogisms.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts. When solving a problem, one must understand the question, gather all pertinent facts, analyze the problem i.e. compare with previous problems (note similarities and differences), perhaps use pictures or formulas to solve the problem.

Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – A type of logic in which one goes from a general statement to a specific instance. The classic example All men are mortal. (major premise) Socrates is a man. (minor premise) Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion) The above is an example of a syllogism.

Deductive Reasoning Syllogism: An argument composed of two statements or premises (the major and minor premises), followed by a conclusion. For any given set of premises, if the conclusion is guaranteed, the arguments is said to be valid. If the conclusion is not guaranteed (at least one instance in which the conclusion does not follow), the argument is said to be invalid. BE CARFEUL, DO NOT CONFUSE TRUTH WITH VALIDITY!

Deductive Reasoning Examples: All students eat pizza. Claire is a student at ASU. Therefore, Claire eats pizza. 2. All athletes work out in the gym. Barry Bonds is an athlete. Therefore, Barry Bonds works out in the gym.

Deductive Reasoning 3. All math teachers are over 7 feet tall. Mr. D. is a math teacher. Therefore, Mr. D is over 7 feet tall. The argument is valid, but is certainly not true. The above examples are of the form If p, then q. (major premise) x is p. (minor premise) Therefore, x is q. (conclusion)

Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning, involves going from a series of specific cases to a general statement. The conclusion in an inductive argument is never guaranteed. Example: What is the next number in the sequence 6, 13, 20, 27,… There is more than one correct answer.

Inductive Reasoning Here’s the sequence again 6, 13, 20, 27,… Look at the difference of each term. 13 – 6 = 7, 20 – 13 = 7, 27 – 20 = 7 Thus the next term is 34, because 34 – 27 = 7. However what if the sequence represents the dates. Then the next number could be 3 (31 days in a month). The next number could be 4 (30 day month) Or it could be 5 (29 day month – Feb. Leap year) Or even 6 (28 day month – Feb.)