New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Central IRBs An IRB Infoshort June Working Definition  A central IRB is one that serves as IRB of record for all of the sites engaged in a research.
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN SUBCONTRACTS/SUBAWARDS CITI Training.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Stanley Estime, MSCI October 19, 2015 Record Keeping: What is Regulatory Documentation and how should it be maintained? Tel:
HIPAA and Human Subjects Research IRB Member CE May 2014 Slideshow by Sean Horkheimer.
NIH CHANGES TO POLICIES, INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS Presented by the Office of Sponsored Programs.
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA).  Coeus is now updated with the SF424 D-Forms for all NIH submissions due May 25, 2016 and after.  For proposals.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Certificates of Confidentiality:
NIH Update Maria Skinner, OSP Manager (NIH Lead) Laura Johnston, OSP Asst. Director January 7, /7/2016.
IRB Open House: Implementation of Single IRB Review
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
ClinicalTrials.gov Requirements
Conditional IRB Approval
Upcoming NIH Proposal Preparation Changes
Stephanie Oppenheimer, MS SUCCESS Center Erica Ellington, CRA, CHRC
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA)
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
Ceding Review: Using the new SmartIRB Online Reliance System
Amendments A how-to Prepared by: Christine Melton-Lopez, IRB Associate.
Jamie Reddish, MPH Research Compliance Administrator
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
NIH Clinical Trial Requirements
ClinicalTrials.gov: An introduction
New NIH Human Subjects Requirements
NIH FORMS E Changes Faculty Info Session
NIH Forms E Town Hall
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
NIH Clinical Trial Initiatives: “Putting it All Together”
Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Brown Bag Series October 2017
How Does NIH Define a Clinical Trial?
JH Trial Innovation Unit (TIU)
Doing Human Subjects Research? Changing NIH Policies May Impact You
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Preparing for NIH’s sIRB Review Requirements
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Anca Miron, PhD IRB Chair, UW Oshkosh Kelly Schill, BS, CIP
Multisite Human Subjects Research
NIH Clinical Trial Requirements
implementing NEW NIH Human subjects guidance
The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Common Rule.
Secondary Research with Identifiable Information and Biospecimens
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
NIH’S Redefinition of Clinical Trials and Using the New Human Subjects Form Chris Sylvester, M.A. Senior Grant Administrator (AO) Grants and Contracts.
National Institute of Health: Updates from NIH Regional Seminar 2017
Student Training in GALIS
Changes to the Common Rule and Single IRB (sIRB)
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Human Subjects, Clinical Trials & Inclusion  Overview of Key Policies and Tips for Success Dawn Corbett (NIH/OER); Elyse Sullivan (NIH/OER)
CTSA27 So you want COMIRB to be your sIRB: What you need to know.
Protocol Approval Criteria
Office of the Vice President for Research Human Subjects Protection Program IRB Submission Process Module 4 - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability.
Presentation transcript:

New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information Ayisha Ali & Nadia Hajjar The goal of the NIH in updating these forms was to consolidate human subjects, inclusion enrollment, and clinical trial information previously collected across multiple agency forms

What is the difference between clinical research and a clinical trial? Clinical research includes all research involving human participants. It does not include secondary studies using existing biological specimens or data collected without identifiers or data that are publicly available. Clinical trials are clinical research studies involving human participants assigned to an intervention in which the study is designed to evaluate the effect(s) of the intervention on the participant and the effect being evaluated is a health-related biomedical or behavioral outcome

How can researchers determine whether a proposed study is a clinical trial? The following questions should be used to determine whether a study meets the NIH clinical trial definition: ▪ Does the study involve human participants? ▪ Are the participants prospectively assigned to an intervention? ▪ Is the study designed to evaluate the effect of the intervention on the participants? ▪ Is the effect being evaluated a health-related biomedical or behavioral outcome? If the answers are all “yes,” the study is a clinical trial. If any answers are “no,” the study is not a clinical trial If the PI is unsure, encourage the PI to reach out to the program officer. * If the PI is still unsure after answering these questions, encourage them to reach out to the program officer for confirmation

New Human Subject Form New form is included in all applications (whether or not human subjects or clinical trials are involved) Required form fields vary based on a number of factors, including: Whether study is delayed onset Announcement-specific instructions Human subject exemptions Whether study involves a clinical trial

R & R Other Project Information Form NIH will continue to collect Human Subjects information on the R & R Other Project Information form

When Human Subjects = No When human subjects is NO, Applicants answer a single question, provide associated Attachment (as applicable), and are done with form unless Instructed in announcement to include other requested Information attachment Information populated in this Field from R&R other project information form Human specimen/ data question: Answer to this question required and system enforced when Human subjects is NO. An attachment has to be Uploaded If you answer YES.

When Human Subjects = Yes (not delayed onset) Full Study records require quite a bit of data New data collection leads applicants through clinical trial information collection requirements Data collection expanded for new policies Check FOA to determine if attachment is needed If yes to Human Subject, add Study Title. Study title must be unique with in the application.

Delayed Onset Studies Delayed onset - no well defined plan for human subject involvement at time of application Does NOT mean delayed start of study Minimal data collection Must justify why full study information can not be provided Required if Delayed onset study is included. In addition to justification, must include information on how the study will comply with NIH single IRB if multi-site research Is involved. Cannot add Delayed Onset study if you answer NO to human subjects question

Study Record: Section 1-Basic Information Exemption 4- Research involving the collection or study of existing data or specimens if publicly available or information recorded that subjects cannot be identified

Study Record: Section 2- Study Population Characteristics Recruitment and Retention Plan- Describe how you will recruit and retain participants. Address both planned and proposed recruitment Study Timeline- Provide a description or diagram describing the study timeline Conditions-At least 1 entry is required but the PI can provide up to 20 study population characteristics. If available, use appropriate descriptors from (MeSH) Inclusion- Women, Minorities and Children all together

Inclusion Enrollment Report Planned enrollment must be completed when answer to “using existing dataset” question is NO If YES then only complete cumulative enrollment.

Study Record: Section 3 Protection and Monitoring Plans All of Section 3 is required for all studies involving human subjects unless noted otherwise Data and Safety monitoring plan is only required if you answered “Yes” to all the questions in the clinical trial questionnaire If not-clinical, but has human subjects, the overall structure of the study team is optional If Yes to multi-site, single IRB plan must be included

Study Record: Section 4 Protocol Synopsis Study Design: all questions under the study design are system enforced Brief Summary: is required for CT studies unless noted in FOA *Limited to 5000 characters Interventions: up to 20 allowed

Study Record: Section 4- Continued Outcome Measures: At least one outcome measure is required for CT studies. Up to 50 outcome measures are allowed Dissemination plan: one dissemination plan is sufficient. You may attach the same plan for multiple studies

Study Record: Section 5- Other Clinical Trial-related Attachments Attachments in this section are allowed for CT only. Up to 10 attachments can be uploaded, only if noted in FOA.

Tips on How to connect with your PI on New Forms Confirm with PI if the proposal is Clinical Trial or Not Clinical Trial For some research grants NIH has specific FOA for CT and for not CT PI’s are not familiar with new Human subjects forms Send them the screen shots of the forms Convert forms into PDF fillable forms Set a meeting to complete these forms Note: Please do not try to answer any question on your own. Note: You will experience errors for copy and pasting the text in some fields.

NIH Single IRB The policy affects multi-site studies involving non-exempt human subjects research funded by NIH, and applies to grant applications with due dates on or after January 25, 2018 This policy applies to the domestic sites of NIH-funded multi-site studies where each site will conduct the same protocol involving non-exempt human subjects research. It does not apply to career development, research training or fellowship awards.

Single IRB at Proposal Stage Single IRB plan: The justification must include the following elements: Describe how you will comply with NIH policy on use of sIRB for Multi-site research Provide the name of the IRB that will serve as the sIRB of record. Indicate that all identified participating sites have agreed to rely on the proposed sIRB and that any sites added after award will rely on the sIRB. Briefly describe how communication between sites and the sIRB will be handled Indicate that all participating sites will, prior to initiating the study, sign an authorization/reliance agreement that will clarify the roles and responsibilities of the sIRB and participating sites. Indicate which institution or entity will maintain records of the authorization/reliance agreements and of the communication plan. Note: Do not include the authorization/reliance agreement(s) or the communication plan(s) documents in your application.

Single IRB at Proposal Stage NU IRB of Record Letter of Support: A letter reflecting the acknowledgement that the NU IRB is willing to serve as IRB of record for the study. This must be obtained from NU IRB office and should be included in the proposal with single IRB plan. Sub-award A letter of support from sub-awardee sites indicating they are willing to cede review to the NU IRB is required. This letter should be uploaded into InfoEd internal documents

QUESTIONS?