Industrial emissions: E-PRTR, IPPC and sectoral Directives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pollutant Emissions to Water E-PRTR Reporting requirements Thematic Eionet Workshop 11 September 2008.
Advertisements

Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen SoE meeting 12 June 2007, Copenhagen.
European Commission DG Environment Implementation of the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (European PRTR, E-PRTR) Namur, 7 February 2007.
, EEA, Copenhagen WISE GIS/IT Workshop Welcome Bo N. Jacobsen.
Main Developments in EU Environment Policy. 1.The 7 th Environmental Action Plan 2.Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Updated Directive 3.Timber.
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
The European Shared Environmental Information System Meropi Paneli
Workshop Inspire MIG-P/MSCPs and Reporting under environmental aquis January 2015 JRC Ispra Andreas Grangler DG Environment Unit C.3 – Air & Industrial.
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
SEIS and Data Centres SEIS and Data Centres 25 October 2007, Dublin 8th Joint UNECE TFEIP & EIONET Meeting.
Country Visit LT Towards a Shared Environmental Information System SEIS Bernt Röndell.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
Towards a harmonised approach for collection and interpretation of data on emerging substances in the environment in support of European environmental.
1 MANAGEMENT OF POPs CONTAMINATED SITES IN VIETNAM Dr. Nguyen Anh Tuan Vietnam Environment Administration Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
1 The European Pollutant Emission Register 4th WHO Ministerial Conference Budapest 23 June 2004 Andreas Barkman European Environment Agency.
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
Lesley Rickards MEDIN Core Team European initiatives and how MEDIN and the data in the framework relates to them.
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
Towards a Shared Environmental Information System for Europe SEIS Chris Steenmans Head of Group Data Access and Management.
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,
TFEIP-Meeting May 2010 Jochen Theloke 1/ 5 E-PRTR – spatial mapping of diffuse emission sources project Jochen Theloke, Thomas Gauger, Balendra Thiruchittampalam,
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
E-PRTR dataflow management Introduction and informal review process Eva Goossens Head of Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme.
Shared Environmental Information System for Europe for Europe SEIS 25 October 2007, Dublin.
| Folie | Folie 2 Reporting according to pollution registers Experiences in Austria Mag. Daniela Wappel.
Planned activities for 2016 on better implementation and better regulation in the field of environment policy Make It Work Conference 10/11 Dec 2015 DG.
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
PRTR capacity-building in a global context Belgrade, Serbia 10 October 2007 UNITED NAITONS INSTITUTE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH Chemicals and Waste Management.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
1 The EEA/EIONET Information System current applications and further developments relevant for EECCA countries Stefan Jensen.
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
From data collection to reporting - experiences and boundary conditions for an aggregating reporting system Michael Nagy Umweltbundesamt Wien Experience.
Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
Streamlining of Industrial Emissions Reporting
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
- Progress and planning- European Commission
EEA Annual Work Programme
Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Concept and state-of-play
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting
The role of IMPEL in promoting the implementation and enforcement of European environmental law Giuseppe Sgorbati & Michael Nicholson IMPEL
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
The Commission Communication on implementation (COM (2012) 95) in relation to Water Industry Directives (Urban Waste Water Treatment, Drinking Water,
Towards WISE as a distributed system
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants
Progress SOE Reporting NRC/NFP water workshop – 2nd October and SOE-DG/NRC meeting – 3rd October Beate Werner; EEA.
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
WISE - State of the art --- WISE - in the context of SEIS
- Progress and planning- European Commission
Water Information System for Europe
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
Meeting of Water Directors
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
WISE Implementation Plan
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
WISE achievements and expectations
SCG Meeting Brussels, 18 February 2005
SCG Meeting Brussels, 18 February 2005
Quality aspects of EPER
Water Information System for Europe
Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW
Ratification of the UNECE Protocol on Pollutant Release
Item 9.6 Mainstreaming geo-statistics
Presentation transcript:

Linking and Streamlining Reporting E-PRTR a register for industrial emissions 16 January 2009

Industrial emissions: E-PRTR, IPPC and sectoral Directives Air Quality: EMEP Water Quality: WISE surface water air Production of paper and board and other primary wood products Main Annex I activity Production of pulp from timber or similar fibrous materials Thermal power plant Annex I activity WWTP Facility P, Operator P Facility Q, Operator Q A B C F E D cooling water Other installation Non-Annex I activity

Shared Environmental Information System SEIS is a collaborative initiative of the Commission and the EEA together with the MSs, to establish an integrated, shared and sustained information system for environmental information in Europe serving two main purposes: - improve the sharing of environmental data and information (or data impacting environmental policies) within Europe and provision of services to public policy makers and citizens; - offer to MSs and EU institutions an efficient system to access environmental data and information to fulfil their reporting obligations related to Community environmental policies and legislation, avoiding duplication of efforts, overlapping and redundancies.

SEIS Principles information should be managed as close as possible to its source information is provided once and shared with others for many purposes data and information should be readily accessible to end-users to enable them to access it timely information should be made available to the public after due consideration of the appropriate level of aggregation, given possible confidentiality constraints, and at national level in the national language(s)

Summary main benefits of SEIS Streamlining of data requirements and data flows More informed policy decisions Wider availability of information and better return on investment Common standards, tools and services At EU level: it will facilitate considerably the current streamlining efforts of data requirements and flows and data flows including better legislation. The MSs inputs will be more consistent and integrated. This will allow efficient EU-level analysis to inform policy discussions related to environmental issues and sustainable development using tools and services that are already developed under established programmes (eg GMES) or that will be developed due to the SEIS boost. This increase of European capacity will lead to more effective and integrated outputs at both MS and EU levels that can be used as the basis for communicating messages and actions against well-defined policy priorities. At MS level: They will benefit from the streamlining and priority setting of data requirements and data flows that SEIS will facilitate with less duplication of efforts. The implementation of the SEIS principle 'report once use many' will enable the use of the same information not just by the small thematic or geographic communities of policy makers (<50 people) but by many other users: policy makers in other themes or sectors, informed public, researchers (>10000). This will render MSs investments for monitoring more cost-effective. Furthermore, MSs will benefit from the standards, tools and services that would need to be developed at European level for implementing SEIS (e.g. portals, viewers, information integrator for performing integrated analysis or for creation of metadata). Finally, MSs will benefit from cross-country benchmarking and from the multi-lingual communication that SEIS will enable. At global level: substantial efficiency gains can be achieved by organising the SEIS in the EU in such a way that allows both MS and the EU to meet their policy commitments and evaluation obligations under the various international conventions and global initiatives. The SEIS will increase the credibility of the EU vis-à-vis international initiatives and programmes related to environmental data collection, management and exploitation such as GEO, GEOSS, Biodiversity conventions etc.

SEIS and E-PRTR SEIS and E-PRTR State of Play: E-PRTR implements SEIS principles: Electronic reporting, Storage of information in database Access to the public through Internet Potential: Distributed E-PRTR storage of data in national PRTR E-PRTR website downloads from national PRTR based on a network of public information providers sharing environmental data and information

What is EPER/European PRTR?

based on IPPC Directive From EPER to E-PRTR European Pollutant Emission Register based on IPPC Directive 12,000 facilities Triennial data (2001 and 2004) 50 substances and 32 different sectors Threshold values about 90% of the emissions of the industrial facilities European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register 2007 first reporting year Annual data from 2009 Point sources emissions - 91 substances (including POPs) emitted from 65 different sectors Additional information Off-site transfer of waste and waste water Emissions caused by accidents on the site Releases to land Diffuse emissions

System = data flow+quality control+register The register is cost effective tool for: Enhance harmonisation of data collection and transfer system Monitor compliance Setting priorities (knowledge based decision) Raising environmental awareness Existing pollutants inventories PRTR

EPER (2001-2004) POPs E-PRTR (2007-) Aldrin Chlordane Chlordecone DDT Dieldrin Endrin Heptachlor Lindane Mirex Toxaphene Dioxins and Furans PCBs Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) * Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) * PeCB PeCB * PBDE (Penta BDE, Octa BDE) PBDE (Penta BDE, Octa BDE) * Endosulphan * Trifluralin * SCCPs

How does the Register function Data accessibility: Tabular queries Geographical queries Graph chart Data download

HCB releases to air

Data gap analysis I Getting the numbers to match up:  making sure that what is reported now is based on common data and approaches and has cross checking and reporting on differences Improving the accuracy of reported data: Includes a focus on actually using facility level data in national estimates and improving national statistics and the use of data from other instruments. Removing reporting duplication: Focussing on what steps/changes are needed to reduce duplicative/redundant reporting elements.  Will include SEIS type eReporting ideas and some thoughts on E-PRTR and how this is integrated with NECD/CLRTAP National reporting (EMEP Database ) and WFD reporting (WISE Database).

Data gap analysis II Releases from diffuse sources Gathering existing data 91 pollutants / agriculture, aviation, construction, domestic fuel combustion, fossil fuel distribution, SMEs, solvent use-road traffic Compile an EU-wide inventory When data is not available > Initiate corresponding reporting

A coordinated effort: MS and operators cooperate to improve the quality of data Community wide electronic database informs the public about important pollutants emissions, mainly from IPPC installations Watch-dog: opportunity for the public to submit inputs, comments and information

Some further streamlining opportunities Link and harmonise Facility ID (WISE-PRTR-IPPC-ETS) > SEIS Traceability Link numerical and descriptive data to spatial data > Integration of different database Apportionment: point source (UWWT~IOWWT) and diffuse sources identification Link emissions releases (discharge) and accidental releases (losses) into water bodies with discharge point ID and coordinates Compare aggregated data (WISE) and disaggregated data (PRTR) Eu-wide inventory for diffuse source (multi-pollutants, multi-sectors) > promote POPs trends

Conclusions EPRTR Regulation Art.5 & 9 contains rules for determining how to collect data Operator is responsible for data collection and quality assurance MS responsible for quality assessment Best available information Internationally approved methodologies Importance of measurement for waste and water Traceability Data transformation according to different user needs (data aggregation) > POPs Avoid duplicating reporting (SEIS and streamlining opportunities)

For more information… DG ENV industrial emissions website http://www.ec.europa.eu/environment/ippc/index.htm EPER >E-PRTR website www.eper.ec.europa.eu/ WISE http://water.europa.eu/en/welcome EMEP http://www.emep.int/

Thanks for your attention Dania Cristofaro DG Environment - Directorate C Climate Change&Air Unit 4 Industrial Emissions & Protection of the ozone layer E-mail: dania.cristofaro@ec.europa.eu