A17 Tier III Installation: Beginning Stages Lead Presenter: Ali Hearn Exemplar Presenters: Sarah Wright & Nancy Wiebelhaus Lincoln Public Schools,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Implementing Tier Two in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Tier 3 Wraparound: Readiness to Implementation
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Building Tier 2/3 Creating a Seamless System of Support.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Data, Systems and Practices in CICO
Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development Part 2: Tools and Strategies Cynthia Anderson, University of Oregon Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Tier 2 & 3 External Coaches Network Meeting Location Meeting Time October, 2012.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Partnering with School/Family/Community at All Three Tiers, Part 2 Kimberli Breen Technical Assistance Director IL-PBIS Network Lynn Owens PBIS External.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
VTPBiS Intensive Level Wraparound Webinar Presented by: Jesse Suter February 4, 2015.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
E11: Secondary/Tertiary Systems Development, Part 2: Tools & Strategies Michele Capio, Illinois PBIS Network Pam Horn, School District U-46 (IL)
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
Wraparound A Tier 3 Process Family Voice and Choice Rachel SaladisHugh DavisBlair Krueger/Kristi Serwek Wisconsin PBIS Network WI Family TiesFond Du Lac.
Building Capacity at the State, District & Building for Wraparound at Tier 3 Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network Maura Burns, Frost Middle School.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Recognition Process Materials available on
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Advanced Tiers in High Schools Ali Hearn, IL PBIS Network Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
ROLE OF CLINICIANS IN MTSS BUILDING CAPACITY FOR CHANGE AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL National PBIS Leadership Forum October 22-23, 2015 Ali Hearn, LCSW Midwest.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Rachel Saladis Kim Miller Kathy Halley.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
ELL PROGRAMS Presented to Hubble staff Making Choices for Excellence PBIS Team Leaders Presentation PBIS Positive Behavior Intervention Supports.
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Tier 2 Coaching Jessica Swain-Bradway, IL PBIS Network
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
SCTG COACHES WEBINAR November 3, 2015 December 1, 2015 January 5, 2016 February 2, 2016 March 1, 2016 April 5, 2016 May 3, 2016.
District Leadership SCCOE October,  How are things going with this first SW-PBIS cohort? What has worked? What are challenges? What tangible outcomes.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
RENEW Rehabilitation for Empowerment, Natural Supports, Education and Work
D1- Leveraging PBIS Implementation Leader Presenters: Rob Horner, University of Oregon Caryn Ward, University of North Carolina (SISEP) Key Words:
A10. Intro to Tier 3….Arrrre youuuu REAAAADY???!
Year 3 Day 4.
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Interconnected Systems Framework PA PBS Network Professional Learning Community Webinar #2 April 11, 2017.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
Wraparound, a Tier 3 Process
Welcome to the DE-PBS Cadre Meeting
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
3-Tiered System of Support Necessary Conversations (Teams)
BEST Summer Institute June 27, 2018
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
Bringing RTI to Scale in Oregon
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
District Leadership SCCOE
Tier 3 PBIS Wraparound Essentials
Presentation transcript:

A17 Tier III Installation: Beginning Stages Lead Presenter: Ali Hearn Exemplar Presenters: Sarah Wright & Nancy Wiebelhaus Lincoln Public Schools, NE Key Words: Tier III, Systems Alignment, Mental Health

Maximizing Your Session Participation When Working In Your Team Consider 4 questions: Where are we in our implementation? What do I hope to learn? What did I learn? What will I do with what I learned?

Where are you in the implementation process Where are you in the implementation process? Adapted from Fixsen & Blase, 2005 We think we know what we need so we are planning to move forward (evidence-based) Exploration & Adoption Let’s make sure we’re ready to implement (capacity infrastructure) Installation Let’s give it a try & evaluate (demonstration) Initial Implementation That worked, let’s do it for real and implement all tiers across all schools (investment) Let’s make it our way of doing business & sustain implementation (institutionalized use) Full Implementation

Leadership Team Action Planning Worksheets: Steps Self-Assessment: Accomplishments & Priorities Leadership Team Action Planning Worksheet Session Assignments & Notes: High Priorities Team Member Note-Taking Worksheet Action Planning: Enhancements & Improvements

Please Provide Feedback Your feedback is important to us! Please take a few moments at the end of the session to complete an evaluation form for this session. Forms are available: In our mobile application by clicking the link in the session description. Online underneath the posted presentations at www.pbis.org/presentations/chica go_forum_18

Washington, DC Save the dates, February 20 – 23, 2019 for the… Pre-Conference Workshops FEBRUARY 20 Skill-Building Workshops FEBRUARY 23 Breakout Sessions FEBRUARY 21 - 22 Networking | Posters | Exhibits Washington, DC Grand Hyatt Washington For more information, visit: conference.apbs.org

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v76f6KPSJ2w

Now get out your deodorant, this work ain’t easy! You Made It! Now get out your deodorant, this work ain’t easy!

WHERE ARE WE AT IN THE TRIANGLE? Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5% Individual students Assessment-based High intensity 1-5% Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions Individual students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15% Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Small group interventions Some individualizing 5-15 Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Small group interventions Some individualizing Students receive supports based on their response to intervention More intense as youth move up triangle (more teacher/family time, more data) Available at all 3 tiers Fidelity at Tier 1 improves Tiers 2/3 Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90% All students Preventive, proactive 80- 90% Tier 1/Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive 9

Students Staff Parents Families SCHOOL-WIDE Tertiary Prevention: POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Students Staff Parents Families ~80% of Students

A Multi-Tiered System of Support for Behavior Tier 1/Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems Classroom Practices ODRs, credits Attendance, Tardies, Grades, DIBELS, etc. Tier 2/ Secondary Tier 3/ Tertiary Check-in/ Check-out (CICO) Assessment Intervention Modified CICO Daily Progress Report (DPR) (Behavior and Academic Goals) Social/Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG) Competing Behavior Pathway, Functional Assessment Interview, Scatter Plots, etc. Brief Functional Behavior Assessment/ Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP) Complex or Multiple-domain FBA/BIP Perception Tools: Home, School, Community Tool, Education Tool Wraparound / RENEW

10 Principles of Wraparound and RENEW Family Voice and Choice Team-Based Natural Supports Collaboration Community-Based Culturally-Competent Individualized Strengths-Based Unconditional Care Outcome-Based NWI standardized the 10 principles in 2004 2008–Revised persistent to unconditional

If you haven’t thought deeply about systems before…you will need to now! Who will be part of the Tier III Systems/Implementation Team and when will they meet? Who/how will we provide professional development to the staff? Facilitator FTE Scheduling considerations Coaching Personnel Time to Coach Thinking differently about discipline Flexibility with educational programming Etc.

Tier 3 What is it?

Wraparound and RENEW Tier III Wraparound and RENEW are PROCESSES for supporting youth and families with complex needs. Defined by 10 Principles Implemented in 4 Phases Builds self efficacy/self-determination

4 Phases of Wraparound & RENEW Youth referred for Tertiary Level Services and Supports Phase 1: 1. Engagement & 2. Team Preparation Phase 2: Initial Plan Development Phase 3: Implementation and Monitoring of Plan Phase 4: Transition

How do you know who to give Tier 3 Supports to? Consider: Data (think: top 1% -5%) Discipline (ODR, ISS, OSS) Grades Attendance Daily Progress Report (DPR) Family and School are in conflict Student is at risk of a more restrictive placement Lower level supports have not been effective Needs across multiple life domains

Phase I: Engagement and Team Preparation A person-centered planning process is used for engagement RENEW: A mapping process with 9 maps (including “History”, “Who I am today”, “Resources”, Strengths and Accomplishments”, “Dreams”, “Goals”, etc. Wraparound: A “coffee chat” style conversation with a family/student to learn about strengths and needs

Who I am Today

People and Resources

Dreams

Engagement…It starts with a COFFEE CHAT.

Tier 3 What does it take to get ready?

Readiness for Tier 3 Leadership Teams Access and Use of Data District-wide Building-wide Access and Use of Data Resources, Coaching and Facilitation

District Readiness for Tier 3 District Community Leadership Teams Monitors implementation Policies and procedures District Team Access and Use of Data Identify implement and monitor screening process Overall monitoring of fidelity and student outcomes Action Planning District Allocated Resources, Coaching and Facilitation District Coaching Flexible Resources and Educational programming Community Partner Collaborations

District Readiness Checklist

District Readiness Checklist Cont.

Building Readiness for Tier 3 Building Leadership Teams Tier 3 Implementation Teams Administration included regularly Able to address systems issues quickly including FTE, flexible educational options, discipline, etc. Tier 3 Student Teams are Individualized and are not the same thing as the Tier 3 Systems Team

Building Readiness Checklist

Building Readiness for Tier 3 Building Access and Use of Data Screening process- IN Progress monitoring- ON This can be challenging since every student/plan is unique. Process for weaning back down to Tier I/II supports Ability to check the fidelity and integrity of the Facilitator’s implementation

Building Readiness for Tier 3 Building Allocated Resources, Coaching, and Facilitation Training Consideration for # of facilitators and time necessary to implement practices with fidelity Flexible Resources allocation to meet training and coaching needs Coaching structures in place to help build capacity

Individualized Teams at the Tertiary Level Are unique to the individual child & family Blend the family’s supports with the school representatives who know the child best Meeting Process Meet frequently Regularly develop & review interventions Facilitator Role Role of bringing team together Role of blending perspectives

Wrap Integrity Tool

RENEW Integrity Tool RIT)

Fidelity of Intervention Data You can find it here

Fill out the TFI section for Tier 2. Identify 0’s and 1’s

Tier III Support Plan Evaluation

Lincoln Public Schools, NE Sarah Wright Nancy Wiebelhaus

Lincoln Public Schools Second Largest School District in Nebraska 39 Elementary Schools 12 Middle Schools 6 Traditional High Schools Just over 40,000 students

History of Implementation Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Current Year Secondary Tier 1 Elementary Tier 1 Secondary Tier 2 Elementary Tier 2 Fidelity of Tier 1 and 2 First cohort of WRAP and RENEW FBA/BIPs Second cohort of WRAP and RENEW Third cohort of WRAP and RENEW

Cohort Model Wraparound/RENEW 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 7 elementary/middle schools opted in (Wraparound) 6 high schools (RENEW) 9 more elementary/ middle schools (Wraparound) All high schools ongoing training 16 more elementary/middle schools (Wraparound) High schools ongoing training 15 more elementary/middle schools (Wraparound)

Building Leadership Teams

1b and 1c Training Plan Cohort Model Started with _____ schools Invited all roles of a Tier 3 team Clinicians Admininstrators Gained building buy-in (via training plan) Tier 2 review~Opt in or out

1g Tier 2 look back and review Helped teams understand where Wrap fits into systems Schools were initially given option to opt out for now. Examples -- Schools that had trouble identifying families for WRAP and schools that identified families but the student hadn’t been through all the previous tiers AND didn’t have school, community and home impact

2. Building Teams Access and Use of Data

2a Criteria SW data Tier 2 data Key: Risk of placement change Sample Data: Had to help schools understand Wrap is more than just providing services to families in need.

2d and 2e Tier ⅔ Tracking Tool Wrap data collection form

Youth Satisfaction Tool

3. Building Allocated Resources, Coaching, and Facilitation

3a, 3b, 3f Resource and Facilitation Allocation Training Plan Initial training Ongoing training Ongoing technical assistance Yearly follow up Ongoing coaching Challenge: Understanding flexible facilitation

3e Plan Facilitation Started with 1 plan per school Currently expanding Components of Each Plan: Compiled Electronically

Team Meeting Sign In and Intervention History

Strengths Needs Profile and Wrap Plan

2017-2018 District Wide Wrap Data # Responding # of Total Plans % Responding September 9 13 69% October 7 14 50% November 22 59% December 16 34 47% January 21 26 81% February 17 82% March 20 91% April 10 71% Talking about fluctuating data: kids moving could be an issue (kid left, moved to a school that doesn’t do Wrap), started wrap and then parents backed out

THANK YOU! Contact Us! Ali Hearn- ali.hearn@midwestpbis.org @heyalihearn Sarah Wright- swright4@lps.org Nancy Wiebelhaus- nwiebel@lps.org