National findings from the Illicit Drug Reporting System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORT Full report Executive summary Methodology STATISTICAL ANNEX Seizures Drug use Prices Illicit laboratories.
Advertisements

Monitoring Trends in Illicit Drug Use in Australia Wayne Hall School of Population Health, University of Queensland and Louisa Degenhardt and Natasha Sindicich.
2 emcdda.europa.eu European drug report package A comprehensive analysis on the drugs problem in Europe.
The purpose of this overview is to update the facts pertaining to the possibility of upward trends related to heroin trafficking and/or abuse in the Commonwealth.
CDER/CSS ALSDAC September 9-10, 2003 Risk Management and the Controlled Substances Act: The FDA Perspective Deborah B. Leiderman, M.D., M.A. Director Controlled.
Prevalence and Patterns of Nonmedical Use of OxyContin ® and Other Pain Relievers Joe Gfroerer Office of Applied Studies Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Opioid Safety Phillip Coffin, MD, MIA Director of Substance Use Research San Francisco Dept. of Public Health Assistant Clinical Professor University of.
Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Briefing for DHHS, September 5, 2007 Joe Gfroerer Office of Applied Studies Substance.
National Overdose Deaths Number of Deaths from Prescription Drugs.
Prescription Opioids: Extramedical Use and Overdose
John R. Kasich, Governor Tracy J. Plouck, Director Andrea Boxill, Deputy Director Andrea Boxill, Deputy Director Governor’s Cabinet Opiate Action Team.
LEGAL AND ILLEGAL SUBSTANCES. LEGAL DRUGS Legal drugs are considered permissible for use, and are either prescribed by a physician (prescription medications)
HOW DRUGS ENTER THE BODY
1. 2 National Institute on Drug Abuse Community Epidemiology Work Group (CEWG) Established 1976.
LESSON 3.8: PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE Module 3: Drugs & Addiction Obj. 3.8: Use data to provide evidence for the prescription drug abuse epidemic.
Opiates. Opiates: what, exactly are they?!? Opiates are used to induce sleep and alleviate pain. They act as depressants to the central nervous system.
USE AND ABUSE PRESCRIPTION, NON- PRESCRIPTION, AND ILLEGAL DRUGS.
Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Dependence CESAR FAX U n i v e r s i t y o f M a r y l a n d, C o l l e g e P a r k A Weekly FAX from the Center for.
Table 1. Prediction model for maximum daily dose of buprenorphine-naloxone in a 12-week treatment condition Baseline Predictors Maximum Daily Dose Standardized.
WHAT IS A DRUG? TYPES OF DRUGS? CATEGORIZATION OF DRUGS WHAT IS DRUG ABUSE? WHY DO PEOPLE USE DRUGS? WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF DRUG ABUSE?
2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results Alaska High School Survey Grades 9-12 Alaska Division of Public Health Weighted Data Alcohol and Other Drug Use.
Jennifer R. Havens, PhD, MPH Associate Professor
1 Did You Know 42% of US high school seniors use alcohol.
MRCPsych addiction psychiatry seminar series Policy, guidance and legal framework of addiction treatment Classification of substance use disorders Assessment.
Take help for drug addiction in Best Price
Substance Misuse in LGBT populations
Drugs 6th Grade Health.
Drugs.
DRUGS Any substance that, when taken into the body, will modify one or more of the body’s functions, including a person’s mental, emotional, or physical.
Presentation by Paul Dillon
Narcotics, Stimulants, and Depressants
Methadone and Suboxone
Preliminary reliability and validity of an opioid overdose risk behavior scale in a community-based sample of recent veterans E.R. Pouget, A.S. Bennett,
Narcotics, Stimulants, and Depressants
Opioids – A Pharmaceutical Perspective on Prescription Drugs
Andy Mills Manager Complex Needs Team
European Questionnaire on Drug Use among Prisoners - EQDP
MODULE 2- EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DRUG USE IN THE AMERICAS
MEDICATION ASSISTED TREATMENT for OPIATE ADDICTION
Controlled substance compliance
Opioid-, amphetamine- and cocaine-induced deaths
Opioid overdose mortality trends in Australia
The European Experience: Prescription Drug Misuse in France, Germany, Italy and Spain 24 October 2017 Presented at Lisbon Addictions 2017 Jody L. Green,
Wicomico County Local Behavioral Health Authority
PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAMS
Module 1: Putting Drugs of Abuse and Clients in Perspective
Finding Cases of Non-Overdose, Not Drug Poisoning in Montana
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Non-fatal poisoning with illicit drugs in Denmark
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
Figure 1: Drug of choice, ACT,
Lesson: Using Medicines Wisely
Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing
Tasmanian Drug Trends 2019: Methamphetamine use, markets and harms
Delaware School Survey Trend Charts Statewide Trends
Delaware School Survey County Trend Charts Kent County
2017 Annual Report Snippets NSDUH, SAMHSA, USA DHHS Selected Trends
Delaware School Survey County Trend Charts New Castle County
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Delaware School Survey County Trend Charts Sussex County
National Overdose Deaths Number of Deaths Involving All Drugs
Figure 1. National Drug Overdose Deaths Number Among All Ages, by Gender, Figure 1. National Drug Overdose Deaths—Number Among All Ages, by Gender,
Drugs Involved in U. S. Overdose Deaths
National Overdose Deaths Number of Deaths from All Drugs
National Overdose Deaths Number of Deaths from All Drugs
Data Sources ADH: Other AR Data: National: Vital Statistics PDMP
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
Drugs injected in New Zealand
Drug Overdose Prevention Program Awareness Training
Presentation transcript:

National findings from the 2018 Illicit Drug Reporting System

Figure 1: Drug of choice, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Substances listed in this figure are the primary endorsed; nominal percentages have endorsed other substances. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 2: Drug injected most often in the past month, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Substances listed in this figure are the primary endorsed; nominal percentages have endorsed other substances. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018

Figure 3: High frequency substance use in the past six months, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. These figures are of the entire sample. Y axis reduced to 50% to improve visibility of trends. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 4: Past six month use and frequency of use of heroin, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 5: Median price of heroin per cap and gram, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Among those who commented. Price for a gram of heroin was not collected in 2000. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 6: Current perceived purity of heroin, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 7: Current perceived availability of heroin, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 8: Past six month use of any methamphetamine, powder, base, and crystal, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. # Base asked separately from 2001 onwards. ‘Any methamphetamine’ includes crystal, speed, base and liquid methamphetamine combined. Figures for liquid not reported historically due to small numbers, however in 2018 3% of the national sample reported use of liquid amphetamine in the six months preceding interview. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 9: Frequency of use of any methamphetamine, powder, base, and crystal, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. Y axis reduced to 90 days to improve visibility of trends. Median days used base and crystal not collected in 2000-2001. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 10: Median price of powder methamphetamine per point and gram, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Among those who commented. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 11: Current perceived purity of powder methamphetamine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Methamphetamine asked separately for the three different forms from 2002 onwards. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 12: Current perceived availability of powder methamphetamine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Methamphetamine asked separately for the three different forms from 2002 onwards. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 13: Median price of base methamphetamine per point and gram, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Among those who commented. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 14: Current perceived purity of base methamphetamine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Methamphetamine asked separately for the three different forms from 2002 onwards. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 15: Current perceived availability of base methamphetamine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Methamphetamine asked separately for the three different forms from 2002 onwards. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 16: Median price of crystal methamphetamine per point and gram, nationally, 2001-2018 Note. Among those who commented. No data available for gram in 2001. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 17: Current perceive purity of crystal methamphetamine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Methamphetamine asked separately for the three different forms from 2002 onwards. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 18: Current perceived availability of crystal methamphetamine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Methamphetamine asked separately for the three different forms from 2002 onwards. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 19: Past six month use and frequency of use of cocaine, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. Y axis reduced to 10 days to improve visibility of trends. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 20: Median price of cocaine per cap and gram, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Among those who commented. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018

Figure 21: Current perceived purity of cocaine, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 22: Current perceived availability of cocaine, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis; *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 23: Past six month use and frequency of use of cannabis, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 24: Median price of hydroponic (a) and bush (b) cannabis per ounce and gram, nationally, 2003-2018 (A) Hydroponic cannabis (B) Bush cannabis Note. Among those who commented. From 2003 onwards hydroponic and bush cannabis data collected separately. No data available for ounce in 2000 and 2001.

Figure 25: Current perceived potency of hydroponic (a) and bush (b) cannabis, nationally, 2004-2018 (A) Hydroponic cannabis (B) Bush cannabis Note. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. Hydroponic and bush cannabis data collected separately from 2004 onwards. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 26: Current perceived availability of hydroponic (a) and bush (b) cannabis, nationally, 2004-2018 (A) Hydroponic cannabis (B) Bush cannabis Note. The response ‘Don’t know’ was excluded from analysis. * Hydroponic and bush cannabis data collected separately from 2004 onwards. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 27: Past six month use (prescribed and non-prescribed) and frequency of use of methadone, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Includes methadone syrup and tablets. Non-prescribed use not distinguished 2000-2002. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 28: Past six month use (prescribed and non-prescribed) and frequency of use of buprenorphine, nationally, 2002-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. Y axis reduced to 60 days to improve visibility of trends. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 29: Past six month use (prescribed and non-prescribed) and frequency of use of buprenorphine-naloxone, nationally, 2006-2018 Note. From 2006-2011 participants were asked about the use of buprenorphine-naloxone tablet; from 2012-2015 participants were asked about the use of buprenorphine-naloxone tablet and film; from 2016- 2018 participants were asked about the use of buprenorphine–naloxone film only. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. Y axis reduced to 60 days to improve visibility of trends. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 30: Past six month use (prescribed and non-prescribed) and frequency of use of morphine, nationally, 2001-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 31: Past six month use (prescribed and non-prescribed) and frequency of use of oxycodone, nationally, 2005-2018 Note. From 2005-2015 participants were asked about any oxycodone; from 2016-2018, oxycodone was broken down into three types: tamper resistant (‘OP’), non-tamper proof (generic) and ‘other oxycodone’. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. Y axis reduced to 12 days to improve visibility of trends. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 32: Past six month use (prescribed and non-prescribed) and frequency of use of fentanyl, nationally, 2013-2018 Note. Data on fentanyl use not collected from 2000-2012, and data on any non-prescribed use not collected 2013-2017. For the first time in 2018, use was captured as prescribed versus non-prescribed. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 33: Past six month non-prescribed use of fentanyl, by jurisdiction, 2018 Note. Figures for non-prescribed and any use not presented for SA due to n≤5. In Tasmania, no participants reported fentanyl use.

Figure 34: Past six month use and frequency of low-dose codeine (for non-pain purposes), nationally, 2013-2018 Note. Median days computed among those who reported recent use (maximum 180 days). Median days rounded to the nearest whole number. Y axis reduced to 50% and 90 days to improve visibility of trends. Differences between 2017 and 2018 data should be viewed with caution due to differences in the way questions were asked in 2018 i.e. participants could only report use occurring in the last six months but prior to rescheduling in February 2018). *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 35: Past six month use of codeine, by jurisdiction, 2018

Figure 36: Past six month use of other drugs, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Non-prescribed use is reported for prescription medicines (i.e., benzodiazepines, anti-psychotics, and pharmaceutical stimulants). Participants were first asked about steroids in 2010, anti-psychotics in 2011 and e-cigarettes in 2014. Pharmaceutical stimulants were separated into prescribed and non- prescribed from 2006 onwards, and benzodiazepines were separated into prescribed and non-prescribed in 2007; *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 37: Use of opioids, stimulants and benzodiazepines on the day preceding interview, 2018 Note. This figure captures those who had used stimulants, opioids and/or benzodiazepines on the day preceding interview (83%; n=744).

Figure 38: Past 12 month non-fatal overdose, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Estimates from 2000-2005 refer to heroin and morphine non-fatal overdose only. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 39: Take-home naloxone program and distribution, nationally, 2013-2018 Note. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 40: Borrowing and lending of needles and sharing of injecting equipment in the past month, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. Data collection for ‘reused own needle’ started in 2008. Borrowed (receptive): used a needle after someone else. Lent (distributive): somebody else used a needle after them. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 41: Self-reported mental health problems and treatment seeking in the past six months, nationally, 2004-2018 Note. Stacked bar graph of % who self-reported a mental health problem, disaggregated by the percentage who reported attending a health professional versus the percentage who have not. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.

Figure 42: Self-reported criminal activity in the past month, nationally, 2000-2018 Note. ‘Any crime’ comprises the percentage who report any property crime, drug dealing, fraud and/or violent crime in the past month. *p<0.050; **p<0.010; ***p<0.001 for 2017 versus 2018.