APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Advertisements

... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Network Team Institute Training on Teacher and Leader Effectiveness From Theory To Action through the Network Team Approach NTI Monday,
Teacher Evaluation & APPR THE RUBRICS! A RTTT Conversation With the BTBOCES RTTT Team and local administrators July 20, 2011.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
OCM BOCES Day 6 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
SSL/NYLA Educational Leadership Retreat New York State Teacher Evaluation …and the School Librarian John P. Brock Associate in School Library Services.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
NY’s APPR Plans and Review Process.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System APPR Conference April 30 – May 1, 2012.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
The Next Chapter of Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as described in the April 15th Draft Regulations.
NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS LEGAL PROVISIONS NEGOTIATION ISSUES “TO DO” LIST.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Technical Support Webinar May 8, 2012 Presented by: Broome-Tioga BOCES RTTT Network Team.
Curriculum and Instruction Council May, Welcome and Introductions.
January 2016 Slides updated Emergency Action At their December 2015 meeting, the Board of Regents [again] took emergency action Introduced APPR.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
APPR Update School Year.
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Implementing Race to the Top
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Updates for Middle Level Liaisons Alexander Trikalinos, Office of Educator Quality and Professional Development.
TEACHNJ Act Tenure Law & Value Added Teacher Evaluation
Chief School Officers January 2019 State Updates.
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Presentation transcript:

APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012 Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012

Recent developments Governor Cuomo set a deadline for SED and teachers’ unions to settle their APPR differences by January 2012 Just before the deadline, the governor, SED and union officials announced their agreement to amendments to 3012-c, APPR legislation The revisions to APPR will become law if the governor’s budget is approved as early as April 1. SED recently issued guidance on the revisions.

Other Measures of Teacher/Principal Effectiveness Teacher Composite Effectiveness Score 2012-13 Student growth percentile score on State assessments in ELA and/or Math in Grades 4-8 Growth using comparable measures for all other classroom teachers (aka Student Learning Objectives) State Assessments (20 Points) (25 if value added approved) Locally selected measures of student achievement or growth that are determined to be rigorous and comparable across classrooms Locally Selected Measures (20 Points) (15 if value added approved) Classroom observations One or more options from multiple measures Must address ALL NYS Teaching Standards once per year Other Measures of Teacher/Principal Effectiveness (60 Points)

Locally Selected Measures of Student Achievement “Locally selected and points assigned to teachers and principals in manner determined locally, through collective bargaining, using regulatory standards and scoring bands.”

Options for Locally Selected Measures State assessments, Regents exams, and/or Regents equivalents as long as measure used is different from Growth from SED or SLO State approved list of 3rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES-developed assessments School-wide growth or achievement SLO’s (as long as different from first 20)

Other Measures of Teacher Effectiveness Classroom Observations Minimum 2 observations, one must be unannounced. At least 31 points May be done in person or by video Multiple observations by principal or other trained administrator Additional observations conducted by trained evaluators independent of the school, or in school trained evaluator Surveys and/or feedback from students and/or parents using SED approved survey tools Structured review of lesson plans, student portfolios and/or other teacher artifacts

2012-13 Principal Composite Effectiveness Score Student growth percentile score on State assessments in ELA and/or Math in Grades 4-8 , student growth/Value Added measure as applied to State assessments and/or graduation rates. Other comparable measures if principal is not covered by State provided growth or value added measure State Assessments (20 Points) (25 if value added approved) Locally selected measures of student achievement that are determined through collective bargaining that are to be rigorous and comparable across classrooms All options must be different from any measures used for growth sub components. Locally Selected Measures (20 Points) (15 if value added approved 31 points from supervisor’s broad assessment of the principal based on rubric Multiple visits by supervisor/trained evaluator Remaining points from results of goals mutually set by supervisor and principal All leadership standards must be assessed at least once per year. Other Measures of Principal Effectiveness (60 Points)

Other Measures of Principal Effectiveness “broad assessment of leadership & management actions” At least 31 points Multiple visits, at least one by supervisor, others can come from other trained administrators or trained independent evaluator Results of school improvement goals set collaboratively by the superintendent and principal One goal must address principal’s contribution to teacher effectiveness Other goals shall address improvements in academic results or school’s learning environment.

Additional APPR Highlights Scoring bands established in legislation Ineffective on growth and local leads to ineffective overall Timely and expeditious appeals provision APPRs, in prescribed form, must be approved by Commissioner for rigorous adherence to law and regulation Preserves district discretion around probationary teachers and tenure

What is the Process for the Statute and the Regulations? Step 1 Agreement between NYSED and Teachers’ Unions Step 2 Statute to be presented as part of the Governor’s budget and approved by April 1 Step 3 Regulations presented to the State Regents for the April 23 & 24 meetings Step 4 Implementation of the law September 1?

What does the Statute Endorse?* Multiple visits- one unannounced- by various observers Ambitious and measurable goals which drive student growth Quantifiable and verifiable goals which measure academic achievement and or school climate *NYSED, March 12, 2012 at NTI Training in Albany

APPR Plans APPR for ALL teachers/principals applies in 2012-13 Plans must be submitted to SED for the approval of the commissioner. A template is expected from SED shortly. Filing APPR plan with all elements before September 1, 2012 makes a district eligible to compete for additional funding. Filing APPR plan by January 2013 is a requirement. Failure to do so will result in districts losing increases in school aid.

What’s in the Memo from SED Details on all required components for teachers and principals Language and numbers for scoring bands What’s negotiated and what SED determines Required APPR plan elements A disclaimer at the bottom of every page regarding the possibility of changes to regulations