AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from JMA 16th GSICS Executive Panel, Boulder, May 2015 Kotaro Bessho and Masaya Takahashi (Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteoroogical.
Advertisements

NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
GSICS Bias Monitoring Routine comparisons of satellite radiances against reference GSICS Correction Function to correct issued radiances For consistent.
Report from JMA 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016 Masaya Takahashi on behalf of Kazumi Kamide Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS JMA’s Cal/Val activities Presented to CGMS-44 Working Group.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India Application of GIRO to Himawari-8/AHI Hidehiko Murata and Masaya Takahashi Meteorological.
Characterizing Diurnal Calibration Variations using Double-Differences Fangfang Yu.
Visible vicarious calibration using RTM
JMA GPRC report Arata OKUYAMA Meteorological Satellite Center,
JMA Agency Report Arata Okuyama, Masaya Takahashi, Hidehiko Murata
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
GRWG/GDWG Joint Web Meeting Agenda
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Report from KMA 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Spectral Band Adjustment Factor (SBAF) Tool
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
DCC inter-calibration of Himawari-8/AHI VNIR bands
Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center,
JMA Agency Report Arata Okuyama, Masaya Takahashi, Hidehiko Murata, Ryoko Yoshino, Keita Hosaka, Tasuku Tabata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological.
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
FY2-IASI and FY3C-IASI towards Demo
Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 22 March 2011
Japan Meteorological Agency / Meteorological Satellite Center
Closing the GEO-ring Tim Hewison
CURRENT STATUS OF ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS AT JMA
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
JMA Agency Report 2017 Arata Okuyama, Masaya Takahashi and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
Annual GSICS Calibration Report for {Agency}
Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Dohyeong Kim (KMA),
Diurnal and Seasonal variations of COMS IR inter-calibration
Hanlie XU, Xiuqing HU, Chunqiang Wu, Tianhang Yang, Na Xu
Himawari-8 Launch and its calibration approaches
GEO-GEO products – diurnal variations
Infrared Inter-Calibration Product Announcements
JMA Agency Report 2018 Masaya Takahashi, Yusuke Yogo and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
AIRS/GEO Infrared Intercalibration
GSICS ATBD (ISRO) GSICS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Inter-Calibration of Indian GEO satellites Pradeep Thapliyal Space Applications.
KMA Agency Report NMSC/KMA
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency
Progress on COMS IR inter-calibration
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
GSICS A WIGOS Component
Masaya Takahashi (JMA) Dohyeong Kim (KMA)
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Developing GSICS products for IR channels of GEO imagers Tim Hewison
Annual GSICS Calibration Report – Way forward
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
Inter-Comparison between COMS/MI and Himawari-8/AHI
Implementation of DCC algorithm for MTSAT-2/Imager
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report Tim Hewison
Impacts of I01 and M05 of S-NPP/VIIRS on AHI-VIIRS Ray-matching
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
G16 ABI B07 Cold Scene Bias to IASI - Action: GIR j
Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Variogram Stability Analysis
JMA Agency Report 2019 Masaya Takahashi, Yusuke Yogo and Kazuki Kodera
Infrared Sub-Group Report Tim Hewison
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
GSICS: A WIGOS Component
Inter-calibration results of COMS/MI using with and without MBCC
Inter-calibration result of COMS/MI using before and after reprocessed CrIS data March 2019 Minju Gu and Dohyeong Kim.
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
Discussion Way Forward for Multispectral IR
Midnight calibration errors on MTSAT-2
Presentation transcript:

AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature Arata Okuyama and Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency 2017 GRWG/GDWG Annual Meeting, 20-24 March 2017, Madison, USA

1. Diurnal variation analysis of AHI-8 and AHI-9 as an ideal case of GEO-GEO approach, SBAF ~= 1.0, so to say, full-time ray-matching

Diurnal variation in IR Tb Tb Biases at the std.radiance Himawari-8/AHI [K] [K] MTSAT-2/Imager [K] [K] AHI-8 doesn’t have significant diurnal variation seen in MTSAT-2, but small variation still exists. [K] [K] [K] [K] [K] [K] [K] [K] [K] Reference sensors: Metop-A/IASI Metop-B/IASI Aqua/AIRS S-NPP/CrIS [K] midnight Dec. 2014 [UTC] [UTC] [UTC] Dec. 2015 3

AHI-8 and AHI-9 Tb bias at the std. scene Diurnal variation of Tb bias for AHI-9 is as small as AHI-8. Hyper-sounder based approach is effective to know diurnal variation, but “gap” exists. Himawari-8/AHI      Himawari-9/AHI Tb biases [K] Tb biases [K] [UTC] [UTC] 14 -28 Feb 2017 14 -28 Feb 2017

GEO-GEO approach by AHI-8/9 B08 (6.2 um) AHI-9 EW gradation? AHI9 – AHI8 stray light AHI-9 Tb matches that of AHI-8 very well. GEO-GEO approach can be of help to know spatial pattern of the Tb bias. [K] [K] AHI-8 [K] AHI-9 [K] AHI9 – AHI8 [K] Averaged Tb in 19x19 pix grid is plotted. Data region is SSP +/- 30 deg.

GEO-GEO approach by AHI-8/9 GEO-LEOs (AHI-9) GEO-GEO (AHI9–AHI8) 0.0K -0.5K +0.5K Band 8 (6.2 um) Tb biases [K] 0.0K -0.5K +0.5K Band 9 (6.9 um) 0.0K -0.5K +0.5K Band 10 (7.3 um) 14 – 19 Feb 2017. Vertical lines show 00 UTC. [UTC] Global averaged Tb difference at the standard temp. The Tb diff. is corrected based on SRF difference. 14 -28 Feb 2017

GEO-GEO approach by AHI-8/9 AHI-9 has Tb bias jump, around 0.1 K, twice per day. Not so many GEO-LEO collocation data in a timing of the jumps GEO-GEO approach is effective in such case. GEO-GEO approach: is available in 24 hrs. can reveal diurnal variation in finer temporal resolution. can illustrate spatial distribution of bias. is relative comparison, which can’t utilize state-of-the-art LEO instruments. Best way would be a blending of GEO-LEO + GEO-GEO approaches, but, how to decide the biases and its uncertainty at each time of a day?

2. AHI-8 Tb bias for lower temperature Response to: Action GIR.2016.3o.1: Arata to check how the cold end corrections are behaving using AIRS.

From my presentation in the last annual meeting... Bias in “cold end” Uncertainty of brightness temperature (Tb) bias tends is larger in lower Tb range, especially in SWIR. Some meteorologists are interested in cold region. It is caused by non-linearity between radiance and Tb and is significant in shorter wavelength. Is such the large bias true? Tb bias is -5 K at 220 K, -15 K at 210K. The corrected radiance become minus in Tb < 207 K. Planck’s law says... [W・m-2・sr-1・(μm)-1] 3.9 um 6.2 um 10.4 um 300 K 0.6021 5.682 9.823 200 K 0.00128 0.1187 0.9703 Energy is 1/470

AHI-8 Tb bias stability for lower temperature Tb bias is stable. Estimated Tb bias deviation is larger for lower temperature. Time series of Tb biases between the hyper sounders and Himawari-8/AHI Band 12 (9.6μm) w.r.t. S-NPP/CrIS    w.r.t. Aqua/AIRS    w.r.t. Metop-A/IASI at 290K at 290K at 290K +1.5 +1.5 +1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 at 250K at 250K at 250K +1.5 +1.5 +1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 at 220K at 220K at 220K +1.5 +1.5 +1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Stable AHI Tb biases w.r.t. CrIS at cold scenes Daily 29 days statistics for GSICS correction

Standard error of Tb bias The standard error based on AIRS and CrIS tend to be smaller in Band 7, 8, and 11, even though there are wide gap-channels around the bands. Standard error of Tb bias at 220 K B07 (3.9 um) B08 (6.2 um) B09 (6.9 um) B10 (7.3 um) B11 (8.6 um) B12 (9.6 um) B13 (10.4 um) B14 (11.2 um) B15 (12.4 um) B16 (13.3 um) Reference sensors: Metop-A/IASI Metop-B/IASI Aqua/AIRS S-NPP/CrIS

Band 11 Band 8 Band 7

Summary GEO-GEO comparison: Tb bias for lower temperature: The approach is available in 24 hrs, can reveal diurnal variation in finer temporal resolution. can illustrate spatial distribution of the Tb bias, and is relative comparison, which can’t utilize state-of-the-art LEO instruments. Best way would be a blending of GEO-LEO + GEO-GEO approaches, but, how to decide the biases and its uncertainty at each time of a day? Tb bias for lower temperature: Likun commented that the IASI on-board processing is not performing well enough in the cold end and noted that AIRS do not have that particular problem. (c.f. minutes of the last annual meeting) Confirmed. Action GIR.2016.3o.1  close

Tb bias Tb bias shows large variation for Band 7, 8, and 11 w.r.t. AIRS and CrIS because of wide gap-channels around the bands. Tb bias at 220 K Reference sensors: Metop-A/IASI Metop-B/IASI Aqua/AIRS S-NPP/CrIS

Standard error of Tb bias at 250 K

Standard error of Tb bias at 290 K

AHI data quality (Tb bias vs location) What is an uneven plot in the diurnal variation? Collocation data location depends on time of day and equatorial crossing time of LEO satellite. Assuming that GEO Tb bias depends on observed location, the uneven plot might be appeared at the timing of reference sensor change. Further investigation is required. AHI Band 12 (9.6um) vs. IASI-A # of collocation data Mean TB bias TB bias in each longitudinal bin ~clear scene 2 x 2 degrees grid statistics for 2015 (Sep. - Nov.)

B08 AHI9 – AHI8 AHI8 AHI9