PREX: Lead / Diamond Target

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREX PAC 29 Jan 2006 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Lead ( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons ( T.W.
Advertisements

Robert Michaels PREX at Trento PREX Workshop 09 Physics Interpretation of PREX 208 Pb E = 1 GeV, electrons on lead Elastic Scattering Parity Violating.
Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise measurement of the density -dependence.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : density -dependence of the symmetry energy. Nuclear.
2010 PREx Run – Dithering & Compton Polarimetry Chun-Min Jen on behalf of the Hall-A JLab. Institution: Syracuse University, NY, 13244,
Lumi Analysis for HAPPEx III / PREX Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 5/18/2007.
R. Michaels PVDIS at Nov 2009 Beam Requirements for PVDIS Property ValueRun-Avg Hel. Correl. 1-Day Hel. Correl. Energy 6 and 4.8 GeVdE/E < 1 ppm < 5 ppm.
Lh 2 target for an 11 GeV Møller - prospect - S. Covrig hall c, jlab 14 august 2008 hp lh 2 targets for pv q weak target design cooling.
RaDIATE 1 st Annual Collaboration Meeting May Cost-effective Irradiations Discussion Radiation Damage In Accelerator Target Environments.
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
Noise Analysis for PREx - Pb Radius Experiment Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 6/20/2008.
MERIT beam spot size (Saturations & projections) Goran Skoro 13 August 2008.
Low beam intensity (MERIT beam spot size – part II) Goran Skoro 30 June 2008.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
Report on E-165 Steve Schnetzer MCC Meeting June 28.
Tolerance Analysis Identify each of the error sources. Determine the sensitivity of each performance parameter to changes in each error source assuming.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
Unsteady Heat Transfer in Semi-infinite Solids Solidification process of the coating layer during a thermal spray operation is an unsteady heat transfer.
PN12 Workshop JLab, Nov 2004 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Parity Violating Neutron Densities Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons.
7A MP 1 Exam 1.Safety: Write down 2 safety procedures to follow in the laboratory. Point test away from yourself and everyone else. Wear goggles to protect.
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA and the Hall A Collaboration E Spokepersons: K. Aniol, A. Saha, J.M. Udías, G. Urciuoli Students:Juan Carlos Cornejo.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
Pb Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering -- Weak charge form factor -- most weak charge is carried by neutrons PREX and.
1/33CREX Workshop Jefferson Lab March 16-19, 2013 NASA/CXC/SAO.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
NuMI NBI03 November 7-11, 2003 FNAL thin beam windows Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 FNAL experience with thin beam windows Issue is: Survival of window in high.
Thermal & Mechanical Support for Diamond Pixel Modules Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria Nov. 6, 2008 ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop.
Fast Helicity Reversal Riad Suleiman Injector Group June 2, 2009.
Parity Mtg, 7 Dec 2007 Bob Michaels Test Target for PREX and e06007 (tilted) No “active” cooling, conducts to Loop 3.
Uses of Radioactivity • Measuring the thickness of foil
Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
1 LARP Collimator Engineering E. Doyle 2/3/05. 2 Review: SS Thermal Simulation 150mm OD 25mm wall Simply supported Heat: 1hr beam life, FLUKA results,
UM PPS Lab Activities Mid-size Panel Tests PPS meeting January 15, 2012 Claudio, Curtis, Dan, Ethan, Riley.
RHIC CNI Polarimeter status RHIC CNI Group February 26, 2008.
PREX Issues. Outline New issue: souce systematics and Aug. 07 run. Update on old issues. Progress at SU.
Liquid Argon Calorimeter Performance at High Rates J. Rutherfoord with R.B.Walker University of Arizona 27 February 2014 V1.0.
This week in the physics course Lectures will cover Chapter 24 (Electric Current) and start Chapter 25 (Electric Circuits) Please note: lecture slides.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Summary of the target session of the IEB Workshop June 19, 2015 | Alexander Nass.
Hall A Collab. Mtg, 6/ 2010R. Michaels, JLAB Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise.
John Polenz Emerson Network Power Liebert Services.
Progress report on the internal target
Electron probe microanalysis EPMA
BODY STRUCTURAL ELEMENT
“hot spots” SIS100 internal beam dump Super-FRS production target
Grigory Eremeev, Joe Grames, Reza Kazimi, Yves Roblin
Unsteady Heat Transfer in Semi-infinite Solids
Sanghwa Park (Stony Brook) for the PREX/CREX Collaboration
D. J. Margaziotis HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
of secondary light ion beams
Raster Update Aug 9, 2016 R. Michaels
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
New Proposed Foam Developments
The G0 experiment at JLAB
G0 Accelerator Planning Meeting (11/1/05)
Noise Analysis for PREx - Pb Radius Experiment
Performance Based Design of a Steel Frame Hotel
Lead ( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX
Phase II Collimators : design status
Lithium lens and window tests
Physics Interpretation of PREX
Complete the following calculation:
PREX / CREX Collaboration Meeting and Status
Complete the following calculation:
Hall A Beam Parameters Table
Presentation transcript:

PREX: Lead / Diamond Target Three bays (PREX-I) PREX-II to have 12 bays Lead (0.5 mm) sandwiched by diamond (0.25 mm) Liquid He cooling ( 50 Watts) P1/9

Experience with our Lead Targets 2 few-hour tests prior to PREX-I up to 100 uA 2 few-day runs of E06007 208Pb(e,e’p) with this lead target 3 targets used during PREX-I. 2 survived for >1 week 1 was performing to spec at 70 uA at the end. P2/9

How the Lead Targets Behave at 70 uA (data on later slides) After ~1 day the target becomes non-uniform, but stabilizes. Synching raster eliminated the additional noise. After ~1 week some targets melt. We believe the diamond loses its thermal conductivity. Support for this from Silviu Covrig’s CFD calcs. P3/9

Charge “Have proper measures to protect the 208Pb target from melting been taken ?” Answer: Yes, some targets melt. But the design “as is” has demonstrated a safety margin of a factor of ~2 to complete the experiment with 10 targets deployed. Have measures been taken and defined to prevent and monitor density fluctuations ? Answer: Yes, although the target becomes non-uniform, the fluctuations in rate are cancelled by synchronizing the raster to the helicity, as demonstrated in PREX-I. (next slide) P4/9

Synching Raster Eliminated Noise due to Target Non-uniformity this synch is now standard hardware Initial Running Flat Plot : Asy on the Left HRS vs Asy on the Right HRS. Should be uncorrelated – different electrons Not synched Synched After ~ 5 days NOT Flat PREX-I Data P5/9

Target Density Intact Melted Y X Y X with thin diamond backing Failure happens fairly suddenly after ~1 week PAVI 09 X P6/9

Thermal Analysis with ANSYS-Fluent16.0 work by Silviu Covrig If thermal conductivity of diamond is above 1000 W/mK then max ΔT ~ 40 K in Pb If the thermal conductivity of diamond drops below 100 W/mK then max ΔT > 450 K and Pb is likely to melt Here, kdiamond = 100 W/mK P7/9

Performance of Lead / Diamond Targets melted melted Targets with thin diamond backing (4.5 % background) degraded fastest. Thick diamond (8%) ran well and did not degrade at 70 uA. NOT melted Last 4 days at 70 uA Strategy: Run with 10 targets using the thicker (250 um) diamond foils P8/9

PREX-II Strategy Deploy 12 lead targets 2 not isotopically pure, used for commissioning 10 isotopically pure > 70 PAC days of beam time (factor of ~2 safety margin) Using “thicker” diamond with a higher starting thermal conductivity. (the thickness 250 um which equals the thickest in PREX-I ) Use graphite backing for 1 of the not isotopically pure and for 1 of the isotopically pure. P9/9

Backup

Safety Factor of 2 for Target Survivability Simplest calculation: Lifetime > 7 days, proposal 35 days need 5 targets have 10  Factor of 2 safety Alternative calculation : The total accumulated charge for the 3 targets was about 82 C (and the last target did not fail) 152 C is needed for PREX-II Safety factor ~ 82/152*10/3 = 1.8