Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Demand Response Forecasting, Measurement & Verification Methods/Challenges/Considerations National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC - June.
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
1 Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
BGS-CIEP Rate - Energy Components (Continued)
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
Hour Ahead Dispatchable Loads Applicable Updates to Procedures Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
NAESB Conference Call October 10, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
2004/06/0 2 Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Small Facilities - Technical Requirements Rhonda Wright.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com State of Demand Response Stu Bresler Vice President- Market Operations PJM Interconnection 10 th OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2014.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
AEMO: DR Mechanism Baseline Methodology DRM Working Group July 2013.
1 Meredith Younghein Energy Division Local RA Requirements for Demand Response Resources: Staff Proposal.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Nodal RTM Settlement Timeline Snapshot Timing for Load and Gen Data (Follow-Up) Mandy Bauld COPS November 10, 2009.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
2017 Seasonal Adjustment Factors
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
Hourly Offers Schedule Update Examples
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Wind Management at MISO
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Emergency Response Service Baselines
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Northwest Demand Response Symposium
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Database Fields for DR PNDRP January 2014.
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Pseudo-tie business procedure
The Future of Demand Response in New England
DR Measurement & Verification

GMAS Preproposal Entry
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
EFFORT REPORTING TRAINING
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Special MRC – Fuel Security
Mike Mumper & Brian Kick Good afternoon
Use of Emergency Engines for Emergency DR Is Good Policy June 24, 2013
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Forecasting Room Availability
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Winter Reliability Program Updated
Presentation transcript:

Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification DRS 7/30/14 www.pjm.com

Existing Process – Emergency Energy settlements Emergency Full DR registrations receive compensation for real time energy load reductions when dispatched Real time energy load reductions based on: If only an emergency registration then hour before event is CBL If there is economic registration at time of settlement submission then use economic CBL Current rules established to balance administration with load reduction accuracy www.pjm.com

Catalyst for issue High volume of PJM dispatches 11 days in 13/14 DY to date $86.5 mm DR dispatch during non-summer months DR dispatch during early morning hours Multiple dispatches in same day DR dispatch of several hours www.pjm.com

Key issues Accuracy of the hour before CBL methodology Cumbersome administrative process to use an economic CBL which requires an EDC review. After the fact selection of CBL to use for settlements and process used to determine which registrations require settlement. Use of economic CBL from economic registration when customer primarily participates in ancillary service market and economic CBL is conservative (“max base load”). www.pjm.com

Issue1: Accuracy of Hour Before CBL Rational for existing market rules Economic CBL is more accurate approach and therefore use when available. Use of 1 hour to represent multiple hours is not robust Over-estimate: schools toward end of the day Under-estimate: early morning event prior to business hours Conclusion from prior empirical analysis Administrative effort to collect historic meter data for RRMSE may not be worth the effort for CSP DR resource may never be dispatched for emergency – why collect and process 60 days of historic data when it may not be used Allow CSP to make decision on administrative effort after event but before submission deadline (60 days after the event). www.pjm.com

Issue1: Accuracy of Hour Before CBL Potential solution: Use current default economic CBL as emergency energy CBL Impact: Load reduction will be much more accurate and stable (mornings, afternoons, winter/summer) More hourly data will be required to complete emergency settlement. www.pjm.com

Issue2: Cumbersome administrative process to use an economic CBL which requires an EDC review. Potential Solution: If we use proposed solution for issue 1 then this may no longer be an issue CSPs will no longer submit economic registration when they only want to use default economic CBL This will cut down workload for CSP and EDC that must review the registrations CSPs submitted thousands of economic registrations from winter event for this reason. www.pjm.com

Issue3: After the fact selection of CBL to use for settlements and process used to determine which registrations require settlement. Potential Solutions: Proposed solution for number 1 will help Only use CBL on economic registration if economic registration in place prior to emergency event This will eliminate cherry picking after the fact to use method that produces highest load reduction Adopt the following energy settlements submission requirements: Voluntary event (PJM does not measure capacity compliance) – CSP must receive confirmation from location that they reduced load during event in order for CSP to submit the settlement If load is typically down and location did not do anything then it does not qualify for settlement (Example - location already down for the day) Notification from CSP to Location does not qualify as confirmation from customer. PJM will periodically request supporting information from CSP. Lack of supporting information may result in referral to MMU and/or FERC OE Mandatory event (PJM measures capacity compliance) – may only submit when capacity compliance records are also submitted Determination of whether or not to submit a settlement for voluntary event is NOT solely based on difference between CBL and meter load www.pjm.com

Issue4: Use of economic CBL from economic registration when customer primarily participates in ancillary service market and economic CBL is conservative (“max base load”). Potential Solutions: Use Emergency CBL if Economic CBL is Max Base Load. www.pjm.com

Only change is to make default economic CBL the default emergency CBL Example1 CSP submits Emergency registration for Location Same process as today (no RRMSE test) PJM has emergency event CSP submits necessary load data to calculate CBL At least 5 weekdays CBL will be calculated based on standard economic CBL (high 4 of 5 with Symmetric Additive Adjustment) Only change is to make default economic CBL the default emergency CBL www.pjm.com

Example2 CSP submits Emergency registration and Economic registration for Location (prior to emergency event) Emergency registration goes through same process as today (no RRMSE test) Economic registration has standard CBL (passed RRMSE test) PJM has emergency event CSP submits necessary load data to calculate economic CBL At least 5 weekdays CBL will be calculated based on standard economic CBL (high 4 of 5 with Symmetric Additive Adjustment) www.pjm.com

Example3 CSP submits Emergency registration and Economic registration for Location (prior to emergency event) Emergency registration goes through same process as today (no RRMSE test) Economic registration has alternative CBL (passed RRMSE test) PJM has emergency event CSP submits necessary load data to calculate standard economic CBL At least 5 weekdays CBL will be calculated based on alternative economic CBL www.pjm.com

Example4 CSP submits Emergency registration and Economic registration for Location (prior to emergency event) Emergency registration goes through same process as today (no RRMSE test) Economic registration has alternative CBL = MBL (max base load) PJM has emergency event CSP submits necessary load data to calculate economic CBL CBL will be calculated based on standard economic CBL (high 4 of 5 with Symmetric Additive Adjustment) www.pjm.com