Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
RTI Levels  Schools must organize their interventions into levels of increasing intensity.  Three Tiers – Tier I, II, III  Higher the need of the student.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Department of Special Education August 3, 2010 iSTEEP Follow-up & Training Presented by: Raecheal Vizier, M.Ed. Special Education Program Effectiveness.
What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.
2011/2012.  ERI is supported through federal and state grant funds.  ERI is an essential component to Response To Intervention (RtI) which requires.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
RtI Basics for Secondary School District of Manatee County PS-RtI Team.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Data Based Decision Making Using Progress Monitoring Data.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Scientifically Researched-Based Interventions (SRBI)
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Progress Monitoring Elementary Intervention Coaches November 22, 2011.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Assessment in an RtI Model 1. Assessment as a Cycle AreaWhenHowMeanUse McAfee, Leong, Bodrova Basics of Assessment 2004.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
Progress Monitoring Presented By: Bart Lyman. Aimsweb Progress Monitoring Guide-Pearson 2012 RTI Implementer Series: Module 2: Progress Monitoring Training.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Data-Driven Decision Making
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Collection Challenge:
Response to Intervention
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Method for Monitoring Student Academic Progress in Basic Skills.
Response to Intervention
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
Where are we Now and What is on the Horizon?
Presentation transcript:

Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring Screening Research-Based Core Curriculum Improved Outcomes For All Children Educational Support Teams Fidelity and Integrity of Instruction and Intervention Tiered Levels of Intervention Scientific Research- Based Interventions Data-Based Decision- Making

Frequent progress monitoring of student performance occurs for all students and is used to pinpoint student-specific difficulties. PROGRESS MONITORING

When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don't adjust the goals, adjust the action steps. Confucius

What Is Progress Monitoring? Progress monitoring involves ongoing data collection on skills that are important to student success and can be used to: estimate student rates of improvement identify students who are not demonstrating adequate progress aid teachers in instructional planning

It Is Formative Evaluation Ongoing, systematic monitoring of student performance occurs with individuals in: the general education classroom during supplemental instruction during intensive instruction

Why Is Progress Monitoring Important? Research has demonstrated that when teachers use progress monitoring for instructional decision-making purposes: students achieve more teacher decision-making improves students tend to be more aware of their performance (e.g., see Fuchs, Deno, Mirkin, 1984; L. S. Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, & Ferguson, 1992; Stecker, Fuchs, & Fuchs, in press)

How does progress monitoring work? Benchmark assessments given 3 times a year Goals established Student progress measured according to need Progress measured against grade level benchmark or individual goal Teaching or intervention adjusted as needed Progress charted & graphically represented Overview of progress monitoring September 2006-one minute probes were given to each of my students to test for WRC per minute. Three probes were given and the mean correct/errors were recorded as the benchmark. From there I put the data collected on the AIMSweb program (will talk more about AIMSweb) and I reviewed graphs with our EST team. Based on the results I chose students to monitor on a weekly basis and since I only had 12 students I chose to do the rest of the class once a month. I set goals based on the VT GE’s for reading fluency (grade 2: 80-100 WRC) Students that were monitored weekly were given additional instruction: Repeated readings (with para or me)—passages read 3x daily, including one reading at home. Title One support-Rhoda Small group instruction in reading fluency with spec.ed.-Fundations fluency pack Decodable text Instruction was adjusted-Jan. “copier conversation” with Rhoda, picked up CS.

Degrees of Progress Monitoring Benchmarking Assess all children three to four times over the course of the school year Strategic Monitoring Assess children in “some risk” category every two-four weeks Intensive Monitoring Assess children in “at risk” category as often as weekly

Progress Monitoring Schedule Parent Contact Fall of 3rd grade

Compares Rates of Progress by Type of Instructional Program or Risk Group Service Code Meal Status Ethnicity ELL

Time to Practice aimsweb.edformation.com/login.cfm Customer ID: ???? Username: regpmteacher Password: train aimsweb.edformation.com/login.cfm

Summarize Data & Examine Results for Individual Students Second Grade-Oral Reading Fluency Instructional Change Aim Line Trend Line No. 2 Trend Line No. 1

CBM & Graphing & Progress Monitoring & RF = +.7 - +1.0 The Research CBM & Graphing & Progress Monitoring & RF = +.7 - +1.0

What kinds of questions do we ask? Questions that are relevant to a student’s goals, progress, and response to new instructional designs: How does progress compare to past performance? How does progress compare to peers? (rate and slope) Is the student responding to instruction with interventions? Is progress being made toward meeting the standard?

What’s my highest score? Can I beat it in the next 2 weeks? What kinds of questions do students ask? Are my scores going up? What’s my highest score? Can I beat it in the next 2 weeks? What skill(s) do I want to work hard on during the next 2 weeks to try to increase my CBM score?