Generalizing the Kodama State

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complex TransformationsG. t Hooft and the Gerard t Hooft Spinoza Institute Utrecht Utrecht University.
Advertisements

The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields
A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting By Bruno Bertrand November 19 th 2004.
A New Perspective on Covariant Canonical Gravity Andrew Randono Center for Relativity University of Texas at Austin.
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Area Metric Reality Constraint in Classical and Quantum General Relativity Area Metric Reality Constraint in Classical and Quantum General Relativity Suresh.
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields  = charge density, J = current density.
Complex TransformationsG. ’t Hooft and the Gerard ’t Hooft Spinoza Institute Utrecht Utrecht University.
Transformations.
Chapter 3 Formalism. Hilbert Space Two kinds of mathematical constructs - wavefunctions (representing the system) - operators (representing observables)
Instanton representation of Plebanski gravity Eyo Eyo Ita III Physics Department, US Naval Academy Spanish Relativity Meeting September 10, 2010.
Curvature operator and gravity coupled to a scalar field: the physical Hamiltonian operator (On going work) E. Alesci, M. Assanioussi, Jerzy Lewandowski.
Cascading gravity and de gravitation Claudia de Rham Perimeter Institute/McMaster Miami 2008 Dec, 18 th 2008.
Chap 3. Formalism Hilbert Space Observables
The nonabelian gauge fields and their dynamics in the finite space of color factors Radu Constantinescu, Carmen Ionescu University of Craiova, 13 A. I.
Quantum One: Lecture Representation Independent Properties of Linear Operators 3.
On noncommutative corrections in a de Sitter gauge theory of gravity SIMONA BABEŢI (PRETORIAN) “Politehnica” University, Timişoara , Romania, .
A quick review on Loop Qunatum Cosmology Yi Ling Center for Gravity and Relativistic Astrophysics Nanchang University, China Nov. 5, 2007 KITPC & CCAST.
Uniform discretizations: the continuum limit of consistent discretizations Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State.
Totally constrained systems with discrete evolution parameter Rodolfo Gambini In collaboration with Jorge Pullin.
Super Virasoro Algebras from Chiral Supergravity Ibaraki Univ. Yoshifumi Hyakutake Based on arXiv:1211xxxx + work in progress.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Many Particle Systems Revisited 3.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Evolution of Many Particle Systems 3.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 4. Introduction to quantum treatments The variational method.
PHYS 773: Quantum Mechanics February 6th, 2012
Gerard ’t Hooft, quant-ph/ Erice, September 6, 2006 Utrecht University 1.
Instanton representation of Plebanski gravity Hilbert space structure and proposed resolution of the Kodama state Eyo Eyo Ita III GR19 Conference, Mexico.
5. Quantum Theory 5.0. Wave Mechanics
Noncommutative Quantum Cosmology Catarina Bastos 21 Dezembro 2007 C. Bastos, O. Bertolami, N. Dias and J. Prata, “Phase Space Noncommutative Quantum Cosmology”
Finite States in Four-dimensional Quantized Gravity. Eyo Eyo Ita III
Random volumes from matrices Based on the work with Masafumi Fukuma and Sotaro Sugishita (Kyoto Univ.) Naoya Umeda (Kyoto Univ.) [arXiv: ][JHEP.
量子力學導論 Chap 1 - The Wave Function Chap 2 - The Time-independent Schrödinger Equation Chap 3 - Formalism in Hilbert Space Chap 4 - 表象理論.
From 3-Geometry Transition Amplitudes to Graviton States Federico Mattei joint work with: Carlo Rovelli, Simone Speziale, Massimo Testa LOOPS ’
Anisotropic Mechanics J.M. Romero, V. Cuesta, J.A. Garcia, and J. D. Vergara Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM, Mexico.
Simplify. Complex Numbers Complex Numbers Intro Definition of Pure Imaginary Numbers: For any positive real number, “b” Where i is the imaginary unit.
Quantum Field Theory (PH-537) M.Sc Physics 4th Semester
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the
Cosmology vs quantum gravity: a chiral signature?
Lagrange Formalism & Gauge Theories
Formalism Chapter 3.
STRING THEORY AND M-THEORY: A Modern Introduction
Ariel Edery Bishop’s University
3D (Higher Spin) Gravity Black Holes and Statistical Entropy
T. P. Shestakova Department of Theoretical and Computational Physics,
Could loop quantum gravity corrections
Throat quantization of the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini(-AdS) black hole
Quantum One.
Chapter III Dirac Field Lecture 1 Books Recommended:
Quantum One.
in collaboration with M. Bojowald, G. Hossain, S. Shankaranarayanan
Inhomogeneities in Loop Cosmology Mikhail Kagan Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry, Pennsylvania State University in collaboration with.
Quantum Two.
Quantum One.
Tachyon vacuum in Schnabl gauge in level truncation
Quantized K
Based on the work submitted to EPJC
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
TOWARD A QUANTUM THEORY OF TIME
Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012
The Stale of a System Is Completely Specified by lts Wave Function
Asymptotic Analysis of Spin Foam Amplitude with Timelike Triangles: Towards emerging gravity from spin foam models Hongguang Liu Centre de Physique Theorique,
It means anything not quadratic in fields and derivatives.
canonical quantization of gravity
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
QM2 Concept Test 11.1 In a 3D Hilbert space,
Finite Heisenberg group and its application in quantum computing
Quantum One.
Don Salisbury Austin College
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Generalizing the Kodama State Andrew Randono Center for Relativity University of Texas at Austin

Introduction Kodama State is one of the only known solutions to all constraints with well defined semi-classical interpretation Represents quantum (anti)de-Sitter space Cosmological data suggest we are in increasingly lambda dominated universe World appears to be asymptotically de-Sitter Introduction: --K State is only (??) known solution to All constraints with well defined semi-classical Interpretation --State represents quantum de-Sitter space --Has well defined expansion in spin network basis (q-deformed K-bracket) --K State is riddled with difficulties Including CPT problems, non-normalizability Not invariant under large gauge t-forms, Negative energies (??) Exact form in connection and spin network basis:

But… Not normalizable under kinematical inner product Not known to be under physical inner product Linearized solutions not normalizable under linearized inner product Not invariant under CPT Violates Lorentz invariance? CPT inverted states have negative energy? Not invariant under large gauge transformation (This could be a good thing) Problems: -Not invariant under large gauge t-forms (could be a problem, but maybe not) -Not normalizable under kinematical inner product (not known to be normalizable under true inner product -Not ostensibly invariant under CPT (show what CPT does) -Inverted state represents negative energy solutions (??) -Loop transform, although believed to be Kauffman bracket has not been shown At the level of rigour of real variables -Reality constraints (??ask Lee about this) Loop transform in complex variables not as rigorous as with real variables Reality constraint must be implemented

Resolution Problems can be tracked down to complexification Immirzi is pure imaginary: Need to extend state to real values of Immirzi parameter This can be done Resolution to problem: Complexification corresponds to choosing Immirzi Parameter to be imaginary. Need To extend state to real values of Immirzi parameter We show that this can be done Answer is surprising: infinite # of states, one of which is de-Sitter (Chern Simons) Answer is surprising: Opens up a large Hilbert space of states de-Sitter/Chern-Simons is one element of this class

The Generalized States States are WKB states corresponding to first order perturbations about de-Sitter spacetime Write action as functional of Ashtekar-Barbero connection, States are pure phase WKB states when Immirzi is real States appear to depend on position and momentum This requires careful interpretation

Interpretation Generalized Kodama state is like NR momentum state Infinite set of states parameterized by curvature Expect different states to be orthogonal Similarities with momentum eigenstate: -Point out variables: time is Cherns-Simons, position is connection, momentum is Levi-Civita curvature -Can label states by curvature -Kinematical inner product shows states are orthogonal: (Show this, but discuss issue of gauge invariance) -Need to formailze this

Levi-Civita Curvature Operator Momentum operator in momentum basis: Similarly can construct gauge covariant curvature operator Curvature operator: -We can now define curvature operator from these states -Our operator (will not come from canonical construction) -Analagous to momentum operator: p=\int p|p><p| dp -Slight modifications to account for gauge covariance (Show here) -States are eigenstates of curvature operator Using this definition of curvature operator:

Properties      ?? Delta-function normalizable Invariance under large gauge t-forms Solve Hamiltonian constraint Semi-classical interpretation (WKB) CPT invariance Negative Energies      Discussion ??

References gr-qc/0504010, “A Generalization of the Kodama State for Arbitrary Values of the Immirzi Parameter” Upcoming papers: Generalizing the Kodama State I: Construction Generalizing the Kodama State II: Properties and physical interpretation