Prosecution Luncheon Trademark

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trademark Group Luncheon March, TM Announcements New version of TBMP due online by end of March Eliminating step of furnishing printed copy of published.
Advertisements

Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates November, 2011.
Prosecution Group Luncheon June, 2011 Trademarks.
Prosecution Group Luncheon June USPTO Report: Intellectual Property-Intensive Industries Contribute $5 Trillion, 40 Million Jobs to U.S. Economy.
UK Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Filing an online notice of defence and counterstatement in opposition proceedings.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association COST COMPARISON OF INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS IN THE USPTO AND INFRINGEMENT ACTION IN.
Welcome to the IEEE IPR Office Trademark Tutorial.
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield “Serving Hoosier Healthwise” State Sponsored Business Managed Care Forms October 2008 Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
Trademark Update January 16, Applicant Must Pay PTO Fees District court review of an ex parte appeal decision by the TTAB Section 1071 (b)(3) –In.
Paradise Point Resort & Spa San Diego, CA October 19-21, 2011 Patenting Protein Therapeutics: In the Shadow of Uncertainty 4th Protein Discovery and Therapeutics.
Welcome U.S. Trademark Registration: The Attorney's Role from Clearance to Renewals Presented by Attorney Courtney Dunn Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor.
ESOS COMPLIANCE PROCESS 26 FEBRUARY REGULATORY APPROACH.
Miami–Dade Aviation Department Ground Transportation Fees Monica Beltran.
Trademarks: Identifying & Protecting Your Rights John Rodriguez Attorney-Advisor Office of International Relations U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Conference.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks April, 2011.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 25, 2009 Trademark – Priority.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 2, 2008 Trademark – Priority.
Trademark Priority Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trademark Priority Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 2, 2007 Trademark – Priority.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 30, 2008 Use in Commerce, Priority.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 28, 2004 Use, Priority.
OVERVIEW OF TRADEMARK PROTECTION IN THE UNITED STATES AND ABROAD Scott Baldwin, Attorney Global Intellectual Property Academy July 18, :30 a.m.
BUSINESS VISITORS TO VANDERBILT (Immigration & Taxation Concerns) Dahlia M. French, Esq. Director Alicia Dinoso-Sharpnack, Sr. Int’l Tax Advisor Elizabeth.
© 2013 Kilpatrick Townsend Presented to Selected Topics in Trademark Law William Bryner Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Protect the ACN Opportunity. Getting It Right It is every Independent Representative’s responsibility to enforce all of ACN’s Policies and Procedures.
Copyright, Trademark, and Patent Laws By: Chelsey Crawford and Jakia Clark.
Protecting trademark names. Seek non-descriptive words The purpose of the mark is to distinguish between products, not to describe the products “Celestial.
Trademark and Copyright Updates July USPTO TMEP Update July 2015 TBMP Update July 2015 Final rule relating to Changes in Requirements for Collective.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Application Information Retrieval.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon October USPTO – New Guide for Service Specimens “in direct association with” the services –Used in advertisements.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to.
Prosecution Group Luncheon January Nice Agreement 10 th ed. Version 2013 developed to classify, most entries are not sufficiently definite to use.
Prosecution Lunch September Trademark Public Advisory Mtg. Concerns about unauthorized practice of law by document mgmt services and others eFiling-
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon August 21, USPTO – Enhanced Assignment Filing New Conveyance Types –Entity conversion –Merger and change of name.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon March Are You A Canadian John Doe? February 2014, Federal Court of Canada ordered an ISP to release the names and.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
MANUAL FOR MAINTENANCE. 1.Click Menu maintenance 2.Create new complaint.
Prosecution Luncheon November 2014 (No December luncheon)
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition Registration & Clearance June 18, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
Prosecution Group Luncheon May, General Announcements Version 3 of TBMP now available online; copies in the print rooms USPTO submits “Trademark.
Trademark May Pay the USPTO’s ATTORNEY FEES??? Ex parte appeal to D. Ct. for De Novo Review –must name the Director of the PTO as a defendant; and.
Prosecution Luncheon February 13, USPTO – TM Withdrawal Form may use form to request withdrawal. Removes info from the attorney and correspondence.
Prosecution Lunch Trademark January NEXT MEETING – ONE WEEK Friday, February 4, 2011 Imogen Wiseman Cleveland IP - London Discussing recent developments.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks August, 2011.
Bruce Kisliuk Group Director, Technology Center 1600.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
1 Trademarks 101 Steve Baron March 4, What is a trademark or service mark?  Kodak  Exxon  Coca  Coca Cola  Mc  Mc Donald’s  Starbucks 
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates October, 2011.
Trademark Update June 13, No Likelihood of Confusion? TAMAYA is not confusingly similar to MAYA TTAB found dissimilarity based on: –3 syllables.
Reviewing Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. and other select 2012 trademark cases of interest Garrett Parks Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Presented to the Alaska.
Mini Law Lesson How Brands Can Use #Hashtags Without Getting Sued Brian Heidelberger
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks
Payments to University of Illinois Students
TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD OVERVIEW
International Trademark Association U.S. Roundtable Program
Prosecution Luncheon July 2016.
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
Welcome to IST e-Lab Entrepreneurship Lab, 3rd Session, 06 November 2017.
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
IRS Tax Exempt Status AWSC Fall Workshop Oct 2018.
US Sections 8 (and 9 and 15) and 71 - practice, audit program, fake specimens Daniel Smart, COLMAN+SMART CITMA Paralegal Seminar.
Chapter 3: Trademarks in E-Commerce.
For Professional Services
TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS and COPYRIGHTS LEGAL PROTECTIONS AND USE AS ASSETS FOR CONSULTANTS AND EARLY STAGE BUSINESS By Robert A. Adelson, Esq. Partner,
Trademark, Patent, or Copyright?
For Automotive Services and Repair
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Prosecution Luncheon Trademark January 2016

10th ed. Of NICE Classification effective Jan. 1, 2016 USPTO 10th ed. Of NICE Classification effective Jan. 1, 2016 TMEP Oct. 2015 update USPTO shutdown – Dec. 22-27 All days considered a “Federal holiday” Waiver of rule to file electronically to maintain TEAS-PLUS status, won’t incur $50 fee

Preclusive effect – B&B Hardware D. Ct. Maryland dismissed infringement complaint. TTAB had granted summary judgment in an opposition brought by Ashe against PNC's application, ruling that PNC and not Ashe had priority of use. The determination of priority in an opposition is the same as for purposes of an infringement claim. Ashe v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Case No.: PWG-15-144 (D. Md. November 17, 2015).

Applicant failed to produce any pertinent documentation. Prove Your Bona Fides Applicant failed to produce any pertinent documentation. Submitted, website showing the history of the company and its products and services, but marks did not appear on the webpages Needed: current business plans, ongoing discussions, or promotional activities to corroborate its claim of a bona fide intent. SJ GRANTED Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Selig Sealing Products, Inc., Oppositions Nos. 91214508 and 91215874 (November 25, 2015) [not precedential].

Manuals Aren’t Goods Aff’d: refusal to register IPOD for [user manuals] as not "goods in trade." Incidental if item: (1) is simply a conduit or necessary tool useful only in connection with the primary goods or services; (2) is so inextricably tied to and associated with the primary goods or services as to have no viable existence apart therefrom; and (3) is neither sold separately from nor has any independent value apart from the primary goods or services. In re Apple, Inc., Serial No. 78521891 (November 13, 2015) [not precedential].

Small Town ≠ Interstate Commerce? Opp: FLATIZZA for "pizza," - Applicant operated a single restaurant in Bothell, WA (pop. 35k) No evidence of: out-of-state customers. not listed in any travel or restaurant guide. No advertising evidence No evidence that any viewers accessed website, the business plan and menu mock-ups were for internal use only. speculation to assume that out-of-state travelers would travel 3 miles off the Interstate to restaurant, Doctor’s Associates Inc. v. Janco, LLC, Opposition No. 91217243 (January 7, 2016) [not precedential].

Prosecution Luncheon Trademark January 2016